Feral Jundi

Monday, October 12, 2009

Legal News: Norwegian Security Contractors Launch Plea Against Congo Death Sentences

Filed under: Africa,Legal News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 12:40 PM

   More news on the legal front for these poor guys.  I wish them well, but yet again, these guys are at the mercy of the legal system in the Congo.  What needs to happen is for the Norwegian government to put the full weight of diplomacy on this one, and demand a fair trial for these guys or have them sent to their home for trial.

    If there is doubt, as to who shot the driver and of the legal process in the Congo, then that is a huge red flag.  If they cannot do the job, then get them back to Norway and have the trial there.  Justice must be served, and if these guys are getting sucked into something political or anything other than justice and the rule of law, then they need to get out of there.  That is the right thing to do, and that is the least Norway can do in order to show respect for two men that had at once served them with service in the military. –Matt

——————————————————————

Guardian

Norwegians Tjostolv Moland (l) and Joshua French (r) attend a military tribunal in Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo. Photograph: Thomas Hubert/Reuters

Norwegian security contractors launch plea against Congo death sentences

 Monday 12 October 2009

Two Norwegian security contractors convicted of murder and espionage in the Democratic Republic of the Congo will tomorrow begin an appeal against their death sentences. Joshua French, 27, who spent part of his early childhood in Margate and holds dual British citizenship, was arrested with Tjostolv Moland, 28, in eastern Congo in May after their driver was found shot dead. The men denied shooting Abedi Kasongo in the head, and said he had been killed during an attack by unknown gunmen.

(more…)

Industry Talk: An Update on CTU–‘We Are Still Stuck Here!’

Filed under: Industry Talk,Iraq,Legal News — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 12:20 PM

   Check it out.  CTU is giving us an update on what is going on, and it looks like they are getting the run around.  Where is the media on this?

    Well, at least the FJ network knows what is up now, and hopefully guys can get the word out on what is happening with CTU. I know several journalist read this blog, as well as some top industry folks, so Buddy, your message will get heard. –Matt

—————————————

Buddy Feeney Said This in the Comments Section of this post:

“Seems we have been forgotten in the world press.

Yes, all five of us were cleared of any involvment in the murder of our friend Jim Kitterman.

Yes, All five of us were released “from Prison.”

However, four months later we are all still here in Iraq and not allowed to leave, for reasons NOT related to any murder.

To date: NOT one of us has been charged with any crime!

I am one of them!

WE ARE STILL STUCK HERE! 12 Oct, 2009″

Link to FJ Post here.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Legal News: A Scuffle Between Security Contractors and Iraqis in the Green Zone

Filed under: Iraq,Legal News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:47 AM

The New York Times editorial board has called the SOFA’s exclusions of protection for contractors “an acceptable price to pay to show this country’s commitment to the rule of law.” A diplomatic concession that blatantly and offensively treats one class of American citizen differently than others hardly demonstrates the U.S. commitment to the rule of law.

What it does demonstrate is that the U.S. government was eager to get a SOFA signed, so as to claim progress on the path to Iraqi sovereignty. To get it signed, the U.S. government made an enormous concession as to the due process rights of one currently unpopular class of its citizens: contractors. By so conceding, we achieved a document we can point to and claim that Iraq is sovereign. Iraqi sovereignty was our stated goal in Iraq. This SOFA is just one last way for us to wave a “Mission Accomplished” banner. –Tara Lee, From the Jurist

*****

   The other day, I was trying to get Tara Lee’s opinion about what is going on here legally.  What are the laws and basic human rights violated in this incident, that would fall under either the SOFA or UCMJ?  My guess is that there isn’t much these guys can do, and I really haven’t seen any new interpretations of the SOFA or UCMJ as it applies to contractors. Tara was one of the few that really had this stuff nailed during the time we signed the SOFA, and she was a lone supportive voice in the sea of negativity regarding what security contractors do.

(more…)

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Legal News: Senate Bill Would Protect Contractor Whistleblowers

Filed under: Industry Talk,Legal News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 10:42 AM

“Studies have shown that whistleblowers are the single most important source of information when people are ripping off the government,” Kohn said. “Without this kind of law, people will not come forward to disclose fraud.”

*****

   Very interesting, and if any of our legal eagles would like to chime in about this one, feel free to comment. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Senate bill would protect contractor whistleblowers

By Robert Brodsky

October 2, 2009

The head of the Senate contracting oversight subcommittee introduced legislation on Thursday that would provide whistleblower rights to employees of companies receiving government contracts.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., sponsored the legislation (S. 1745) that would also apply to employees of state and local governments, nonprofits, and other companies receiving grants or other federal reimbursements such as Medicare.

“Whistleblowers are our first line of defense against waste, fraud and abuse,” McCaskill said. “We’ve got to do everything possible to protect them.”

(more…)

Friday, October 2, 2009

Legal News: Law Restricting U.S. State Department Security Hiring

Filed under: Afghanistan,Legal News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 9:06 AM

   All I have to say on this one is you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. Add this to the long list about ‘what not to do, when deciding to use contract security’. –Matt

——————————————————————

Law restricting US State Department security hiring

10/02/2009

WASHINGTON — A congressionally mandated panel warned that existing US law prevents the State Department from hiring the best contractors to provide security at diplomatic installations worldwide.

According to a report by the independent Commission on Wartime Contracting, a law dating back to February 1990 requires the State Department to “award contracts to the technically acceptable firm offering the lowest evaluated price.”

But other government agencies can choose their contractors on the basis of “best value,” the commission said.

The report called for an end to the legislative requirement and for new rules freeing the State Department to use different evaluation methods.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress