Feral Jundi

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Maritime Security: Somali Militants Training Pirates

Filed under: Al Qaeda,Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 7:56 AM

   So here we go.  This is the trend to watch, and jihadist privateering is now a reality.  My guess is that not only will piracy be lucrative for Al-Shabab, but they will soon be front and center with the drug trade and smuggling. And hey, they might even make some time to play holy war in Yemen. Stay tuned. –Matt

——————————————————————

Somali militants training pirates

‘Relationship of convenience’: Canadian report

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Stewart Bell,  National Post

The Somali militant group Al-Shabab has been arming and training pirates in exchange for a share of their spoils, says a newly released Canadian intelligence document.

Al-Shabab has formed a “relationship of convenience” with one of the two main pirate networks operating off the Horn of Africa, the “Top Secret” intelligence assessment says.

The report describes an “Islamist extremism-piracy nexus” that involves Al-Shabab providing “weapons, combat training and local protection” to the Mudug pirates of southern Somalia.

(more…)

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Maritime Security: Xe Pulls Plug On It’s Counter-piracy Venture, Ship Up For Sale

   That’s too bad, and I was actually hoping that they could make this fly.  This could be a matter of just timing, because I do think an escort ship is the way to go for the really sensitive shipping like weapons or natural gas. Xe should also try to sell it through Aprodex or something like that. –Matt

——————————————————————

MacArthur

Xe pulls plug on its counterpiracy venture; ship up for sale

January 5, 2010

Apparently unsuccessful in marketing it for anti-piracy operations, Xe has put its 183-foot ship McArthur up for sale.

In an online advertisement on the Web site Yachtworld.com, the McArthur is listed at a reduced price of $3.7 million. The vessel is docked in Alicante, Spain.

Xe, the Moyock, N.C.-based private military company formerly known as Blackwater, acquired and refurbished the 40-year-old ship three years ago and declared itself ready to begin patrolling the Gulf of Aden to protect merchant vessels against pirates.

In an interview with The Virginian-Pilot in 2008, Bill Mathews, then Blackwater’s executive vice president, placed the value of the overhauled vessel at $15 million.

Based in Norfolk, the McArthur was built in 1966 by Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Co., now BAE Systems Norfolk Ship Repair. For most of its life, it was used as a research vessel by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. It contains a helicopter pad and two-bed hospital.

The impending sale was first reported Monday on the blog of the U. S. Naval Institute, a nonprofit forum on global security issues. Xe had no immediate comment on the report.

(more…)

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Maritime Security: Pirates Hijack Another Chemical Tanker, And Al Shabab Is Going To Yemen

Filed under: Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 11:42 AM

   Ok, just a heads up to any of the fleets floating around out there.  If Al Shabab is wanting to get to Yemen, more than likely they are going to hitch a ride with some pirates.  It is the cheapest and easiest way for them to get over.  Plus, Yemen is just across the way, so it would totally make sense to try and take out a few of these bums as they cross.

   Further more, if there is any doubt that arming ships is not sensible, then behold this latest round of hijackings.  These guys actually grabbed another chemical tanker!  Believe it.  So how is the strategy working out for all of these multi-million dollar ultra-highspeed Navies floating around in the GOA?  It seems to me that it is severely sucking.  It will really suck when one of these days, a pirate either sells a chemical tanker to Al Qaeda or Al Shabab, or they are contracted by these guys to take a ship.  Then what?  Does it take thousands of people killed in some terrorist attack involving a large ship filled with explosives and chemicals?  Arm the ships I say! Or continue with this current strategy, and see what happens when terrorism and piracy do a waltz in the Gulf of Aden.-Matt

——————————————————————

Somali Rebels Pledge to Send Fighters to Aid Yemen Jihad

January 2, 2010

By MOHAMMED IBRAHIM

MOGADISHU, Somalia — Senior leaders of the Shabab rebels promised Friday to send their fighters beyond Somalia to Yemen and wherever jihad beckoned.

In a military ceremony here, where the rebels publicly showed off hundreds of new recruits, Sheik Muktar Robow, a senior rebel official, said the group would “send fighters to Yemen to assist our brothers.”

He said that the fighters had been trained to fight the African Union peacekeeping force and the transitional federal government in Somalia but that Yemen was just across the Gulf of Aden and that “our brothers must be ready for our welcome.”

(more…)

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Somalia: Pirate Town

Filed under: Maritime Security,Somalia,Video — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 11:58 PM

Strategy: The Failure Of Today’s Counter Piracy Strategy

   I don’t care what any of the experts think on this one.  It doesn’t take a defense analyst or a counter piracy expert to look at these two stories, and the one I posted about the chemical tanker and fertilizer ship being taken, and deduct that the current strategy is not working.

   Look at this first story I posted below. The Dutch capture 13 pirates, and they had to release them because no one wanted to deal with them?  And then they had to give them food and fuel so they could ‘make it home alright’? How sweet of us. Pfffft. This is lunacy.  No wonder this whole piracy thing is increasing, because it is the ultimate criminal venture to be in.

   The next story really spells out the failure of the strategy.  We have a massive flotilla of navies from all over the world, that costs millions of dollars to operate every day, and this is what we get out of that investment? An increase in successful pirate operations?  Who the hell is in charge of this mess?

   The strategy I propose is pretty simple. Make it mandatory that all ships have armed security, and they all have the means to contact a Naval quick reaction force via protected communications. Put the cost of security and proper communications on the shipping industry, and only use a few key Naval vessels for back up.  If a ship gets into a fight with pirates, then they put out the distress call to the closest strategically placed Naval QRF, and do the best they can to hang on until they get there. Hell, we could just have armed drones flying around all day to act as back up. But just as long as there is competent and well armed security on these boats, then this will give the boats enough time to out maneuver the pirates or hang on until help gets on station.

   We could also hunt them down at sea, but good luck with that.  It would take thousands of boats, canvasing the sea, all with the right to search and seize vessels.  Even then, these pirates will just hide on a fishing vessel and pretend to be safe, until the hunting vessels are gone.  I say if we are going to hunt them, then you use really good bait, which is why it is so important to have armed ships with a Naval QRF to back them up. That QRF should also be in the form of aviation, and not some slow cruising boat that would take an hour to get where it needs to be. That is my idea of a a QRF on the ocean.

   The second part of my strategy is all about dealing with the land problem, and that requires eradicating any threats to the government, and giving the government the time and support necessary in order to establish a solid governance over the land. But it all requires a professional army to do a proper job of cleaning up that resistance, and establishing control over key corridors and areas. Anything is possible, just as long as you have the manpower and resources to contribute to the effort.  You could either use a competent PMC (something similar to Executive Outcomes) or try to get an organized and well trained Army that is not busy with the current wars we are in.  Good luck with that last one.

   The point being, is that we really cannot be effective at sea, if we do not have a land based component of our strategy. Until we do what we have to do, these pirates will only continue to get more wealthier, more bold, more greedier, and probably more dangerous because now they can afford the good stuff. –Matt

Edit: 12/31/2009 – Further proof of the failure.  Look at these numbers. (I posted the rest in the comments section)

Mr. PHAM: Unfortunately, and I hate to rain on the parades of the world’s navies, but they haven’t sent an unambiguous message. Since August of 2008 to mid December 2009, the combined navies of the world have stopped 706 pirates. Of these 706, 11 were killed in the altercations with the navies. Four hundred and eleven, however, were simply catch and release because the various countries of the world can’t agree on rules for prosecution.

And so the pirates look at this and say the chances of actually being caught and actually having to suffer some legal penalty, 46 convicted out of 706 stopped, your chances are pretty slim.

——————————————————————

Captured Somali pirates get away scot-free

December 18 2009

The Dutch navy frigate HNLMS Evertsen has released 13 Somali pirates who were captured earlier this month. The European Union failed to find a country willing to put them on trial on suspicion of piracy and ordered their release on Thursday.The pirates were kept in detention on the ship’s aft deck, which was “an unpleasant situation” according to the Dutch Defence Ministry. They were released near Djibouti and transferred to their own ship, which had been towed all the way by HNLMS Evertsen.

HNLMS Evertsen was part of an EU mission off the Somali coast. The men were arrested when they attempted to hijack a merchant ship.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress