Feral Jundi

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Mexico: Drug War Refugees And Comparisons To Colombia

   Could we have a situation where violence gets so bad in Mexico, that we will actually see war refugees gathering at the border?  Imagine thousands of people, all trying to get on the US side of the border, all because things have gotten so bad in Mexico that the people no longer trust that their government can protect them. Things are already bad enough economically there, that people are willing to risk illegal immigration to cross into the US.  If you add the fear of violence caused by the drug war to the mix, well then now you can see how this is something we need to look at.

   At this point, we are just seeing the political asylum cases increase.  The next stage if things got really bad, is just camping out at the border.  If cartels are taking over entire towns, and the Mexican military is having to retake those towns, then you could see why people wouldn’t want to live there.

  And to follow this train of thought, where would we put them all?  Well, if things got that bad, I am afraid that my tent city idea that I brought up for illegal immigrants, would more than likely turn into refugee camps. When you start thinking about the problems in Mexico in this way, it really puts into perspective as to what the potential is and why we should care. I also think that looking at other drug wars like in Colombia are particularly helpful, just to get an idea of where it is all going.

   Finally, check out the last story I posted.  It is about a coordinated attack on Mexican army bases, by cartel henchmen.  That is a new chapter in this drug war, and I am sure we will see more of this.-Matt

——————————————————————

 

Will we see this in the U.S., in order to deal with a humanitarian crisis caused by the drug war in Mexico?

Worse Than Colombia

by Brandi GrissomMarch 31, 2010

The violence raging in Mexico’s drug war is worse now than the terror that enveloped Colombia during the 1980s and 1990s ever was, Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steve McCraw told state lawmakers Tuesday.

“Colombia was never threatened like the government of Mexico is with the level of violence,” McCraw told the House Select Committee on Emergency Preparedness at a Capitol hearing.

The committee and its chairman, state Rep. Aaron Peña, D-Edinburg, focused many of their questions about the state’s emergency preparedness on the current violence just across the border in northern Mexico, particularly in Juárez. “Each and every day we hear about killings, shootings, assassinations, kidnappings,” said Peña, whose hometown is about 10 miles from the Mexican city of Reynosa. While McCraw said the violence will get worse before it gets better and has already outpaced the scariness of Pablo Escobar’s Medellín cartel in Colombia, at least one border expert disagreed, saying that the United States would never let the situation in its neighboring country devolve into the lawlessness that plagued Colombia. “I think maybe he’s exaggerating,” said University of Texas at El Paso professor Howard Campbell.

Peña asked McCraw to compare the violence in Mexico to that during the drug war in Colombia. McCraw said the situation in Mexico is worse. The United States eventually intervened to help the Colombian government quell the violence and take down Pablo Escobar in 1993. “That hasn’t happened in Mexico,” McCraw said. Though Mexican President Felipe Calderón is trying to control the violence, McCraw said those efforts so far have not worked. “There has never been a more significant threat as it relates to cartels and drug and human smuggling on the border today,” he said. Juarez alone has seen more than 4,800 drug war deaths since 2008, according to recent reports in the El Paso Times, including at least 600 killings this year.

(more…)

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Mexico: Gates And Mullen Heading To Mexico, Consular Posts Get 15% Danger Pay

   This is an interesting development, because now we are sending in the big guns to talk shop with Mexico about what else can be done.  And when I hear things like, ‘evolve the Merida Inititative’, I tend to take notice.  Does that mean we are going to add more teeth to it, or fast track the current orders, or what?  Will this look more and more like the Plan Colombia that everyone keeps talking about, as the violence increases on the border?  Well, when you send the chairman of  the Joint Chiefs of Staff and our Defense Secretary to Mexico, that might be an indication of things to come.

   I also noticed over at Diplopundit, that all the consulates in Mexico are getting a 15% Danger Pay increase.  So yet again, is this a sign of things to come?  Because this is definitely a recognition of the fact that things really are dangerous for our diplomats in Mexico.  Duh.

   Finally, I wanted to talk about this Merida Initiative. I have heard next to nothing about this in the idle industry chit chat out there. And believe me, I check the forums and do my searches–yet nothing.  If any of the readership has anything relevant, please feel free to add whatever in the comments. Like with China, I would like to make Feral Jundi the goto resource for anything related to contracting in Mexico.  As this thing ‘evolves’, I think we will see more interesting opportunities pop up–much like what happened with Plan Colombia. –Matt

————————————————————–

Gates, Mullen Head U.S. Crime-Fighting Delegation to Mexico

Camille Tuutti

Mar 22, 2010

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will travel to Mexico City this week as part of a U.S. delegation focused on helping the Mexican government fight drug-trafficking cartels and other security threats.

“It is in our interest that our friends have greater capabilities to protect their own security and to take care of transnational criminal activity such as the drug cartels,” Gates said. “It is in our interest, because we have [a] shared interest to enhance the capabilities of the Mexican armed forces.”

The Mexico visit will build on the last high-level consultative group session, when Hillary Rodham Clinton and Mexican Foreign Secretary Patricia Espinosa discussed ways to evolve the Mérida Initiative in December 2008.

(more…)

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Industry Talk: DHS Pulls SBInet Funding

     She added that funds allocated to the program would be used to for proven technologies like mobile surveillance equipment, thermal imaging devices, ultra-light plane detection systems, mobile radios, cameras and laptop computers for Border Patrol vehicles.  

*****

   I guess the economy dictates, and this project has been killed.  It is kind of interesting that they would list ultra-light plane detection systems as something to be funded.  I wonder if that includes the Flat Top Paramotor Border Patrol para-gliders I brought up awhile back? If it does, I didn’t know that was considered ‘proven technologies’. –Matt

——————————————————————-

DHS Pulls SBInet Funding

By Jack Mann

17 March, 2010

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano

The Department of Homeland Security has pulled the plug on $50 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds for the “Virtual Border Fence,” meant to secure the U.S.’s border with Mexico.  The SBInet project would mesh security cameras, motion sensors, radar and other technologies into a high-tech detection system to defeat illegal border crossings.

“Effective immediately, the Department of Homeland Security will redeploy $50 million of Recovery Act funding originally allocated for the SBInet … to other tested, commercially available security technology along the Southwest border,” said Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano. She added that funds allocated to the program would be used to for proven technologies like mobile surveillance equipment, thermal imaging devices, ultra-light plane detection systems, mobile radios, cameras and laptop computers for Border Patrol vehicles.  She said that DHS has also frozen all funding beyond SBInet’s initial deployment to two areas south of Tucson and Ajo, Arizona, an assessment ordered in January.

Story here.

Monday, March 15, 2010

Mexico: The War In Mexico–Drug Slayings Rock U.S. Consulate

   This is just sad and my heart goes out to the families of the deceased. The infant daughter will now grow up without her parents, all because of the brutal acts of cowards.

   Now on to some thoughts with this.  We must do a better job at containing the border, and we must do a better job at protecting folks in Mexico.  This attack is a clear message by the cartels that they are not pleased with the U.S. It is my view that once we said ‘hey, we will help Mexico out’, then we just declared war on the cartels.  So when the cartels actually strike back and kill one of our own, we should now know that this is an act of warfare, and not some random killing.

    Obviously we have been assisting Mexico in their war down south for awhile, and I have talked about that here. The question I have is will this attack result in us ratcheting up our assistance, or backing off? I also expect more demand on the private side of the house, when it comes to protecting companies operating down there. Hell, we might even see an increase of WPPS folks for Mexico. And of course, there is always the idea I floated here on the blog about how to deal with these thugs.  Who knows, and I would like to hear what the readership thinks? –Matt

——————————————————————

 Drug Cartel Weapons

A captured drug cartel cell and their tools of warfare.

Drug Slayings in Mexico Rock U.S. Consulate

March 15, 2010

By ELISABETH MALKIN and MARC LACEY

CIUDAD JUÁREZ, Mexico — The married couple gunned down Saturday as they drove back from a children’s birthday party with their infant daughter in the back seat were concerned about the violence plaguing this border town, but they never believed they could be its next targets, the husband’s brother said in an interview on Monday.

The couple, Leslie Enriquez, 35, a pregnant American consulate worker, and her husband, Arthur H. Redelfs, 34, an officer at the county jail in El Paso, were within sight of the bridge leading to the United States border crossing when gunmen said to have links to drug traffickers drove up to their car and opened fire, killing them both.

“He was a wonderful man,” said the brother, Reuben Redelfs. “We just regret this as a senseless act of violence.”

Gunmen also killed the husband of another consular employee and wounded his two young children in a near-simultaneous shooting elsewhere in the city, in what appeared to be coordinated assaults on American officials and their families. The killings provoked outrage from Washington and raised new questions about whether employees of the United States and their family members were increasingly at risk of being swept into the cross-fire of Mexico’s bloody drug wars.

The couple had been married for a couple years and lived in El Paso, where they were raising their 7-month-old daughter, who was unharmed in the shooting. Mr. Redelfs said he was now caring for the girl.

Despite concerns about the security in Ciudad Juárez, the couple traveled frequently between Texas and Mexico, where they had friends and Ms. Enriquez worked in the visa section of the American Consulate, Mr. Redelfs said.

“They weren’t worried as targets,” he said.

Asked if he believed the couple were targets because of Ms. Enriquez’s consular job, Mr. Redelfs chose his words cautiously, saying, “I find it more than a coincidence that two separate incidents involving consular employees who were shot and killed occurred on the same day.”

Silvio Gonzalez, a spokesman for the United States Consulate in Ciudad Juárez, said the agency would be closed Tuesday “as we mourn the loss in our community.” The consular office was closed Monday for a holiday.

The killings came during a particularly bloody weekend when nearly 50 people were killed nationwide in drug-gang violence, including attacks in Acapulco as American college students began arriving for spring break.

(more…)

Monday, February 15, 2010

Law Enforcement: The Heroin Road–A Lethal Business Model Targets Middle America

   Fascinating.  These guys have definitely tapped into a drug dealing business model that is far more superior than the major cartels. Small de-centralized  businesses, all getting their heroin from one region in Mexico, and distributing it ‘pizza delivery style’. lol And get this, they are focused on customer service and satisfaction.  Did the Xalisco Boys read the Toyota Way or something?

   So how do you defeat this is my question? You could create doubt about the product they sell, kind of like how the fuel peddle issue is really tweaking Toyota right now. But eventually the product issues will be hashed out, and rumors squashed and business would crank up again.

    Another way, is to decentralize the drug war.  If you want to eradicate small groups, you need small groups who have the incentive to go after them.  A team of bounty hunters, if given sufficient authority necessary to go after these folks, could do the job just fine.  And if you attach a sizable bounty that makes this profitable for the hunters, or implement an awards system based on seized assets, then you could create an industry out of capturing these small time thugs. To really amp up the effectiveness of bounty hunters, they need to be able cross state lines.  Issuing Letters of Marque could be one way to give them that authority, or having some federal agency deputize these hunters. Perhaps some federal and state laws could be modified in order to make bounty hunting more effective?  In either case, you need to give bounty hunters protections that will give them sufficient authority to really go after these dealers.

   Like with the military and issuing Letters of Marque to individuals, law enforcement can have problems relinquishing authority to bounty hunters. It’s one part Max Webber, and one part ego. I happen to think that both groups can exist just fine, much like the Post Office and Fedex exist in the same market, and I think it is an excellent idea to create industries out of killing or capturing terrorists and pirates, or create industry out of capturing drug dealers. What bothers me about what the Xaliscos are doing, is they have decentralized the drug trade and have a business model that is scary efficient. Decentralizing the drug war against these folks is something that should be looked at if we want to keep pace with this business model. –Matt

—————————————————————–

THE HEROIN ROAD

A lethal business model targets Middle America

Sugar cane farmers from a tiny Mexican county use savvy marketing and low prices to push black-tar heroin in the United States.

By Sam Quinones

First Of Three Parts

February 14, 2010

Immigrants from an obscure corner of Mexico are changing heroin use in many parts of America.Farm boys from a tiny county that once depended on sugar cane have perfected an ingenious business model for selling a semi-processed form of Mexican heroin known as black tar.Using convenient delivery by car and aggressive marketing, they have moved into cities and small towns across the United States, often creating demand for heroin where there was little or none. In many of those places, authorities report increases in overdoses and deaths.Immigrants from Xalisco in the Pacific Coast state of Nayarit, Mexico, they have brought an audacious entrepreneurial spirit to the heroin trade. Their success stems from both their product, which is cheaper and more potent than Colombian heroin, and their business model, which places a premium on customer convenience and satisfaction.Users need not venture into dangerous neighborhoods for their fix. Instead, they phone in their orders and drivers take the drug to them. Crew bosses sometimes call users after a delivery to check on the quality of service. They encourage users to bring in new customers, rewarding them with free heroin if they do. (more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress