Feral Jundi

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Strategy: The Failure Of Today’s Counter Piracy Strategy

   I don’t care what any of the experts think on this one.  It doesn’t take a defense analyst or a counter piracy expert to look at these two stories, and the one I posted about the chemical tanker and fertilizer ship being taken, and deduct that the current strategy is not working.

   Look at this first story I posted below. The Dutch capture 13 pirates, and they had to release them because no one wanted to deal with them?  And then they had to give them food and fuel so they could ‘make it home alright’? How sweet of us. Pfffft. This is lunacy.  No wonder this whole piracy thing is increasing, because it is the ultimate criminal venture to be in.

   The next story really spells out the failure of the strategy.  We have a massive flotilla of navies from all over the world, that costs millions of dollars to operate every day, and this is what we get out of that investment? An increase in successful pirate operations?  Who the hell is in charge of this mess?

   The strategy I propose is pretty simple. Make it mandatory that all ships have armed security, and they all have the means to contact a Naval quick reaction force via protected communications. Put the cost of security and proper communications on the shipping industry, and only use a few key Naval vessels for back up.  If a ship gets into a fight with pirates, then they put out the distress call to the closest strategically placed Naval QRF, and do the best they can to hang on until they get there. Hell, we could just have armed drones flying around all day to act as back up. But just as long as there is competent and well armed security on these boats, then this will give the boats enough time to out maneuver the pirates or hang on until help gets on station.

   We could also hunt them down at sea, but good luck with that.  It would take thousands of boats, canvasing the sea, all with the right to search and seize vessels.  Even then, these pirates will just hide on a fishing vessel and pretend to be safe, until the hunting vessels are gone.  I say if we are going to hunt them, then you use really good bait, which is why it is so important to have armed ships with a Naval QRF to back them up. That QRF should also be in the form of aviation, and not some slow cruising boat that would take an hour to get where it needs to be. That is my idea of a a QRF on the ocean.

   The second part of my strategy is all about dealing with the land problem, and that requires eradicating any threats to the government, and giving the government the time and support necessary in order to establish a solid governance over the land. But it all requires a professional army to do a proper job of cleaning up that resistance, and establishing control over key corridors and areas. Anything is possible, just as long as you have the manpower and resources to contribute to the effort.  You could either use a competent PMC (something similar to Executive Outcomes) or try to get an organized and well trained Army that is not busy with the current wars we are in.  Good luck with that last one.

   The point being, is that we really cannot be effective at sea, if we do not have a land based component of our strategy. Until we do what we have to do, these pirates will only continue to get more wealthier, more bold, more greedier, and probably more dangerous because now they can afford the good stuff. –Matt

Edit: 12/31/2009 – Further proof of the failure.  Look at these numbers. (I posted the rest in the comments section)

Mr. PHAM: Unfortunately, and I hate to rain on the parades of the world’s navies, but they haven’t sent an unambiguous message. Since August of 2008 to mid December 2009, the combined navies of the world have stopped 706 pirates. Of these 706, 11 were killed in the altercations with the navies. Four hundred and eleven, however, were simply catch and release because the various countries of the world can’t agree on rules for prosecution.

And so the pirates look at this and say the chances of actually being caught and actually having to suffer some legal penalty, 46 convicted out of 706 stopped, your chances are pretty slim.

——————————————————————

Captured Somali pirates get away scot-free

December 18 2009

The Dutch navy frigate HNLMS Evertsen has released 13 Somali pirates who were captured earlier this month. The European Union failed to find a country willing to put them on trial on suspicion of piracy and ordered their release on Thursday.The pirates were kept in detention on the ship’s aft deck, which was “an unpleasant situation” according to the Dutch Defence Ministry. They were released near Djibouti and transferred to their own ship, which had been towed all the way by HNLMS Evertsen.

HNLMS Evertsen was part of an EU mission off the Somali coast. The men were arrested when they attempted to hijack a merchant ship.

(more…)

Monday, December 21, 2009

Media News: So Why Aren’t Contractors Represented At American Forces Network?

AFN

   The other day I was thinking, why aren’t contractors represented at American Forces Network?  There are thousands of us overseas, and we have been a part of the war effort for years now.  So where is the acknowledgement of our existence at AFN?

   I say this, because every contractor that has ever been to Iraq or Afghanistan, has been exposed to AFN.  We watch all the DoD commercials about safety or suicide prevention or wearing reflector belts on bases, yet there is nothing about contractors.  I think the only commercial I have ever seen dealing with contractors, is a hotline that troops can call if they see contractors ripping off the government.  I wonder if there are any commercials that give information on how to turn in troops who are ripping off the DoD?  Or are contractors the only ones that can do harm?

   Furthermore, you watch all these shows like the Pentagon Channel or the Marines or Army Show, and it is great to see news about what they are doing in the war, but what about the thousands of contractors performing important and essential missions as well?  How about the guys training Afghan Army or Border Patrol folks? Isn’t that a crucial element to the strategy in Afghanistan, yet the contractor side of this is completely ignored?

     How about the munitions clearance programs, or the interpreters, or the dining facility folks?  Where’s the Christmas messages from the various company management out there? Or the thanks from Generals or Congressmen for the work we have done?  I mean you guys contracted our services, are you not thankful for that service?

   I guess my point is, is that we continue to be treated as if we do not exist, or that we really don’t matter in this war.  The reality is that we do matter and we do have a great impact on this war.  And for the DoD to not at least use AFN to communicate with their contractor force, is just stupid.

   They could be developing public service messages that communicate directly to contractors.  The DoD can also target contractors with their resiliency messages, to prevent any future Fitzsimmons type incidents.  There is so much that needs to be said and communicated to my group, yet there is silence. If in fact the DoD wants to make contracting work in this war, they need to connect with us.  To not take advantage of this media tool to create a unity of effort in this war, is yet again, a strategic mistake.

   The irony of it all, is that AFN uses civilians and contractors in the production of their shows. But shhhhh, don’t tell anyone. lol –Matt

Film: Avatar is CGI Cool, But PMC’s Are Once Again The Bad Guys

Filed under: Film — Tags: , , , , , , , — Matt @ 9:19 AM

   Thanks to Christian Lowe for the review.  This movie sounds impressive, but yet again, Holly-weird has decided to portray private industry as the bad guy. Pffft. For that, I will more than likely watch this movie as a rental or at the cheap theater in town when it gets there.

   This gets old, and it is a slap in the face of the thousands of contractors currently in the war, who have served in the war at one point or another, and most importantly, have been killed or maimed in this war.  Thanks James Cameron for nothing. Next. –Matt

—————————————————–

Avatar

Avatar Thrills, but Troops Take Hit

Military.com – Christian Lowe

Dec 17, 2009

It’s pretty simple.

Spend a gazillion dollars on computer animators; concoct an entirely new language, throw the whole thing on another planet with ten-foot-tall aliens that ride dragons and plug into their extraterrestrial horses with biological data cables and add some jet-hovering, super-fortress gunships, belt-fed blasters, and latter day V-22s and you’ve got yourself a pretty good action movie formula, right?

Now make it all 3-D.

That’s exactly what writer/director James Cameron (Aliens, Titanic) tried to do with what is reportedly the most expensive film ever produced. His latest movie Avatar — which opens in U.S. theaters today — certainly lives up to its billing as a visceral assault on the senses. Think of the most gut-wrenching roller coaster ride of your life — and stretch it two and a half hours.

(more…)

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Industry Talk: Stability Operations for Dummies, by Doug Brooks

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Leadership: Disciplinary Policy, Handy Dandies and the Three Strikes Principle

    This article is about a better disciplinary policy for companies. The reason I am bringing this up, is because most of these multi-million dollar defense companies that put security contractors out in these war zones, have absolutely terrible disciplinary policies.  Their leaders out in the field have their hands tied, and often are unable to be effective in keeping control of their troops and maintaining order on the contract. It seems that most contracts have no middle ground when it comes to discipline.  You either do well, or you are fired and sent home, and then replaced by someone else. Or they don’t do anything at all about poor performing contractors. Pffft.  I believe my system is more economical, more effective for maintaining control, and provides a better way of doing business.

     So this is what I think the companies should set up.  It is purely my opinion and based on my experiences as a contractor, former Marine, and former Smokejumper.  It is also based on my management experience in all three occupations.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress