Feral Jundi

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Industry Talk: UN Official Glad About New Somali Force But Wary

    The news here is that now Pierre Prosper has identified Saracen International as the company being used, and until Bill Pelser or someone else comes up with some facts to counter this statement, then this statement will become fact in the realm of the media. This is called strategic communications folks, and if you want to get your story out and correct the record, then this is the place to do it. I have top Google Search for blogs on this subject, and people will read your statements here.

    I also think this is an interesting statement from the UN. Maybe they might actually get behind this project, because this donor–whomever they are, is definitely putting their money where their mouth is.  Speaking of which, if any reader knows who the donor is, I sure would like to hear from you. –Matt

UN official glad about new Somali force but wary

By Pauline Jelinek

12/05/2010

A senior U.N. official cautiously welcomed news that an anti-piracy force is being created in Somalia but he and U.S. officials say they’re concerned about secrecy surrounding the undertaking.

(more…)

Friday, December 3, 2010

Industry Talk: US Concerned By Somali Private Military, CEO Of Saracen International Claims It’s Not Them

     AP named the private security company involved in training the troops as Saracen International, a Uganda-based firm headed by a South African former special forces soldier called Bill Pelser. In a November statement the Puntland government said Saracen had been hired to establish its “marine forces”, while documents from the Somali presidency this year suggested the company had been hired to train the presidential guard in Mogadishu.

     But in a phone interview, Pelser told the Guardian claims of his company’s involvement were “bullshit”, and said he would take legal action against the media. “I have already given a statement to the UN security council on this. None of my assets are involved in Somalia. It must be another company called Saracen,” he said. -story here.

     Pelser denied being involved in the training program in Puntland or the one for the presidential guard in Mogadishu, saying he merely made introductions for another company called Saracen Lebanon. Lebanese authorities have no record of a company called Saracen. Pelser did not respond to requests for contact information for Saracen Lebanon.

     This story just came across my radar, so I am still trying to piece together what’s what.  Although unlike the main stream media, I will give Mr. Pelser the benefit of the doubt and trust that his company is not involved. He says that there is another company called Saracen Lebanon that is training this militia for anti-piracy operations.

    It also seem this militia is being privately funded by a donor from the middle east. This donor is also providing ‘120 new pickup trucks and six small aircraft for patrolling the coast’. That’s impressive, and I would be very curious as to who this mystery donor is and what kind of aircraft they are willing to provide?  If anyone has details, please feel free to expand in the comments.

    The folks that Puntland hired for keeping everything straight are interesting as well. Pierre Prosper was one of them, and this guy is like a legal super star for everything Africa.  He was hired by the Bush Administration to deal with the various war crimes issues in Africa. I am sure he knows what company is being used too.  Check out the link to his profile at the law firm he works at, and you will get an idea of what he is all about. Like I said, if anyone has anything to add, feel free to correct the record or add to this post so we can get the story straight. –Matt

Edit: 12/4/2010- This is interesting.  The president of Puntland was recently questioned by reporters about this anti-piracy force, and he says they will do what they have to do to raise this army and get them trained. So he is not denying or backing down.

(a portion of this article posted below)

Somalia: Puntland pres meets Kuwait emir, defends anti-piracy force

3 Dec 3, 2010

……Anti-piracy force

Puntland’s leader said that the government of Puntland “will not seek approval” from anyone when it comes to security matters.

“For nearly two years, we have requested the international community to help us establish anti-piracy troops and to construct monitoring stations along Puntland’s coast to fight pirates…but we received no answer,” the president said.

He indicated that there are “questions” about Puntland’s agreement with Saracen International, a South Africa-based maritime security company that inked a deal to train anti-piracy troops in Puntland last month.

“What is important is that Puntland improves its security. Without sufficient security, there can be no investment because investment depends on security and stability,” Puntland’s leader said.

He noted that the anti-piracy troops, which are to number 1,050 soldiers when training completes, will still need equipment and telecommunications gear in order to commence the fight against Somali pirates who threaten the world’s shipping lanes.

President Farole said that only African Union peacekeepers (AMISOM) are allowed to bring weapons to Somalia under U.N. regulations, adding: “We will continue to seek equipment and other support for our anti-piracy troops when training completes.”

He indicated that the Puntland-Saracen agreement is “in the spirit of the Istanbul Declaration, which encourages public-private partnerships” for Somalia.

Link to story here.

US concerned by Somali private military

1,000-man militia being trained in north Somalia

Somalia: Puntland signed an agreement with Sarecen Company to train its Marine Forces

US concerned by Somali private military

By MATTHEW LEEThursday, December 2, 2010

The Obama administration raised concerns Thursday about a private military force aimed at combatting piracy in northern Somalia’s semiautonomous Puntland region.

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said the U.S. has been aware of the operation, but is not involved in any way. He said the U.S. has unanswered questions about the backing and purpose of the project, which has begun training an armed force of up to 1,050 men in Puntland.

“We are aware that Puntland authorities have contracted with a private security company to assist them with counter-piracy in the region,” Crowley told reporters. “We were not consulted about this program. We are not funding it. We are concerned about the lack of transparency regarding its funding, objectives and scope.”

Crowley said the U.S. is seeking more information about the force, which officials in the region say is being trained by a private security firm called Saracen International.

(more…)

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Industry Talk: Security Firms’ Future Looks Bright

     While it may seem strange for powerful countries to hand over to the private sector their monopoly on legitimate violence, Chaliand says it should be seen as a private-public partnership.

     Good little article here, and it helped to bring into perspective what this code means and what it could lead too. The only thing I would disagree with here is the cost of contractors versus military. No one ever mentions the whole pension thing or lifetime medical benefits that the military retiree receives, and contractors will not(unless a company provides that).  Nor is the cost of maintaining a large standing army during times of peace ever mentioned as being politically impossible, thus making the idea of an ‘instant support force’ of contractors during times of war a good idea. Or politicians can raise an army through the means of a draft and see how that works……Or not.

     Which takes us back to this code and the possible benefits of such a thing.  Militaries and countries around the world could really stand to benefit from an industry that is well regulated and ready to go.  Most importantly, an industry/temporary work force that is willing and able to serve in a war for that country. Hmmmm–‘willing’ versus ‘forced’, ‘temporary’ versus ‘long term’. –Matt

Security firms’ future looks bright

Nov 22, 2010

by Frédéric Burnand

Private security contractors, 60 of whom recently signed an international code of conduct in Geneva, could see their growth legitimised by this document.

But specialists are warning that without a planned control mechanism the code, which pledges respect of human rights and humanitarian law, could be nothing but an empty shell.

Private security firms have been very active in Afghanistan and Iraq in recent years. Before that it was Africa. But everywhere they operate, these companies have a reputation for carrying out uncontrolled mercenary activities.Today, they want to clean up their image through regulation, according to Alexandre Vautravers, head of international relations at Geneva’s Webster University.“Since the beginning of the decade, the Washington-based International Stability Operation Association has been working on the code of conduct,” he said.

Blackwater a signatory

The document signed in Geneva under the auspices of the Swiss authorities is therefore a response to demands from within the industry. Even Blackwater, best known for its activities in Iraq and since rebranded Xe Services, is one of the signatories.For French author Gérard Chaliand, who has written extensively about the mercenary business, companies like Blackwater have always found ways of surviving and expanding despite the criticism they face.“Regulating this industry seems indispensable to me with extended activities requiring new rules,” he told swissinfo.ch. “But it shouldn’t just be declarations of intention: there should also be sanctions.” (more…)

Monday, November 29, 2010

Technology: China Used Cyber Privateers In Attack Against Google

     The hack was part of a computer sabotage campaign carried out by government operatives, private security experts and Internet outlaws recruited by the Chinese government. This has been going on since at least 2002, the cable said.

     I read this and the first thing that popped out at me was that China was contracting with private industry to attack an enemy in cyber space (the commons).  In this case, that enemy was Google.

     Also, just look at the list of folks they contracted with, and you wonder how is this not cyber privateering?  Perhaps the Chinese understand the concept of ‘creating an industry out of destroying your enemies’, much better than the west. It is also the Chinese who are doing this, and not some poor third world country.

     So this is the next thought that came to mind.  If China is doing this, then why couldn’t the US use the same tool of cyber warfare against the Chinese, or even against a group like Wikileaks?  Hell, we can even be open about it and issue Letters of Marque and Reprisal to individuals and companies in order to make this happen. Just a thought, and hey, China is doing it. lol –Matt

Chinese Government Ordered Hack on Google Servers: Wikileaks

By Clint Boulton2010-11-29

Wikileaks gave the New York Times a diplomatic cable that shows the Chinese government was responsible for the hack on Google’s Gmail system.

China’s government was indeed behind the hack on Google’s Gmail system earlier this year according to a cable captured by the controversial Wikileaks organization.

Wikileaks, which butters its bread collecting secret documents and seeding them in media outlets, snagged 250,000 American diplomatic cables dating back three years and released some of them to the New York Times and other media outlets.

The Times cited one of the cables as proof that “China’s Politburo directed the intrusion into Google’s computer systems in that country, a Chinese contact told the American Embassy in Beijing in January.”

The hack was part of a computer sabotage campaign carried out by government operatives, private security experts and Internet outlaws recruited by the Chinese government. This has been going on since at least 2002, the cable said.

A Google spokesperson told eWEEK: “We aren’t going to be able to comment. As you know, since we revealed this incident in January, we haven’t been speculating as to the parties responsible.”

(more…)

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Jobs: Security Specialist, Afghanistan

     Ok, just to give a fair warning, this is one of those jobs requiring a little more than just a basic security background or service in the military.  These guys are looking for more of a manager/executive protection specialist type with some pretty extensive qualifications.  But it is the World Bank and they are probably paying a pretty good salary for a position like this.

     I am not the POC for this job, and follow the links below in order to apply.  Good luck and let me know how it goes. –Matt

Job #102307

Job Title Security Spec (Afghanistan)

Job Family General Services

Location Kabul, Afghanistan

Appointment International Hire

Job Posted 22-Nov-2010

Closing Date15-Dec-2010

Language RequirementsEnglish [Essential]

Background/General Description

The position of Security Specialist will be established in the World Bank Country Office in Kabul. The incumbent will serve in a full time capacity and on-call for emergencies. The incumbent will also provide security support to the International Finance Corporation (IFC). While reporting to the Senior Security Specialist, GSDSO, the Security Specialist  will discharge his assignment under the direct authority and guidance of the Country Manager.  Operational support, direction and technical supervision will be provided by the Senior Security Specialist (SSS) , the Global Security Operations Coordinator and the Head of Global Security, World Bank Corporate Security. From time to time there may be a requirement to provide security coverage in other countries in which the WBG operates. The duties of the Security Specialist are to provide security support to World Bank Group country office staff in the following areas:  a) security management; b) security awareness; c) contingency planning; d) protective services. Details of these duties are described below but other responsibilities may be added as needed.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress