Feral Jundi

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

PMC 2.0: Biometric Security For Mobile Devices

     I am digging this, because if government or private industry wants to fully integrate mobile devices into their operations, security is paramount. Any means of either shutting down a device remotely or automatically if it is breached, stolen or lost, is a good idea.  I could also see a bio-button having application for other tools of this industry.

     For one, a bio-button could be used to control the fire control mechanism of a sidearm? Meaning if someone takes your weapon or god forbid you lost it, then it would not be capable of firing because it is outside of the range of the bio-button.  Just don’t lose the bio-button! lol You could also apply the bio-button concept to vehicles, safes, entry points, you name it. Although I would put a manual over ride on the button, just incase there is a problem or an attacker uses some kind of electronics frying weapon. Cyber warfare comes to mind with these kinds of devices as well, hence why it is so important to have a strategy within the organization to deal with these threats.

     One cool thing with losing the bio-button according to these guys, is that you can shut down everything remotely using a computer. The other handy feature is the button can be set up to vibrate if for chance, whatever you are tracking has gotten out of your range.  You could also use such a device for close protection, and have a specialist carrying the button and the principal having the mobile device.  Lot’s of uses for something like this. I could also see bio-buttons being integrated into every day items that we keep on us anyways.  A watch, a necklace, a ring, sunglasses, etc.  I look at a device like this as adding redundancy to your sensitive/valuable equipment management system. I don’t look at it as way to shirk personal responsibility towards managing your stuff, but it could definitely help.

    It can also help companies to ensure their stuff is being taken care of by their employees or contractors.  If the device can be shut down remotely, well then it can be monitored remotely as well.  A company can tell if an employee or contractor has that equipment within their reach or not, and this is just one more way of insuring accountability of that equipment.  Stuff to think about and this is definitely PMC 2.0 material. –Matt

—————————————————————–

 

Microlatch ID me Solution

The new Bluetooth ‘bio-button’ mobile security system

Microlatch and a Sydney based development group has created a system that will conveniently and effectively shut down internet fraud, at the same time create a convenient all in one, secure mobile phone (or mobile device) solution to access control, mobile banking, online shopping, home automation, alarm systems, computer and network logins and any number of customised access or login scenarios.

This innovative, patented, three factor securi ty approach using biometrics to provide positive ID in conjunction with mobile phones using a bluetooth interface will allow users to harness the processing power of the modern mobile device in a convenient yet secure form.

User controlled and ‘user friendly’, this method of ensuring positive ID via a biometric ‘Bio-button’ wirelessly ‘paired and tethered’ to a mobile device resolves the security risks inherent with keeping the ‘registered users’ biometric data and digital keys stored on such devices.

For example, a convenient ‘one time’ biometric authentication via the separate ‘Bio-button’ to a ‘smart phone’ allows the user to make full use of the enormous computing and processing power now available in this type of mobile platform.

By utilising the processing power and wireless connectivity available to users via such devices, the ‘id-me’application will allow users to configure various levels of security thereby providing the user customised, secure physical access but also allowing expansion into ‘positive ID’ security for financial institutions, online payment systems, online shopping, contact-less payment systems etc.

(more…)

Monday, June 7, 2010

Industry Talk: Two DynCorp Contractors Killed In Afghanistan

     This just came up on my virtual desk, and this is all that is known about it so far. I do not know the names and there isn’t any chatter on the forums yet. This attack was at the police training center in Kandahar.  I will post any edits if anything pops up. Ms Sparky has it up on her blog as well.

     Rest in peace to the fallen, and all condolences go out to the friends and families of these brave men. –Matt

Edit: 06/08/2010- Two Killed in Attack on Afghanistan Police Training Facility– An American police mentor and a Nepalese security guard working under DynCorp International’s Afghan police training contract were tragically killed yesterday, when insurgents attacked a police training facility in Kandahar, Afghanistan.

Gary W. Willard, 44, of Resaca, Georgia, deployed to Afghanistan as a police mentor on June 22, 2009. Prior to his work in Afghanistan, he was a sergeant with the Calhoun Police Department in Georgia. Earlier, he spent almost ten years with the Whitfield County Sheriff’s Office in Dalton, Georgia. Before his law enforcement career he was a member of the United States Marine Corps.

Hit Bahadur Gurung, 39, of Nepal worked as a security guard at the Kandahar police training facility.

“These men supported the mission in Afghanistan with courage, honor and excellence, and gave their lives in pursuit of a more secure Afghanistan,” says CEO Bill Ballhaus. “We extend our deepest sympathies to their families, loved ones and colleagues.”

Link to release here.

——————————————————————

US Contractor, NATO Troops Killed In Afghanistan

6/7/2010

Two foreign nationals, including a U.S. contractor, were killed on Monday in a suicide-bomb attack by Taliban on a police training camp in southern Afghanistan, reports said.Also on Monday, three soldiers of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) were killed in the country.The U.S. Embassy said an American working for Dyncorp, a U.S. security company, was killed when a suicide-bomber rammed his explosive-laden vehicle into a police training center in the southern city of Kandahar. It did not disclose the nationality of the other person killed.Moments later, an attempt by two other bombers to enter the compound was foiled by security forces who shot them to death, reports quoting a spokesman for the provincial Governor said.

(more…)

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Podcasts: Private Security Contractors And The U.N.-Global Policy Forum

     I thought this was interesting, because the whole intent of the discussion was to highlight the fact that the UN is using private security contractors and at the same time, the UN is tasked with defining how countries are to use and regulate private security contractors. Hell, they even put together a group called the UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries(UNWG).  The title of the group should give you some indication of the irony here.

     So my question is this.  Does the UNWG classify the security contractors that the UN uses as mercenaries?  Does the UNWG classify the UN’s private security contractors as lawful combatants? Check out what the IPOA feels about the whole thing here, and this should give you some context before listening to these guys.

   Finally, there are other speakers at this forum, and follow the link below if you would like to listen to them as well. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Private Security Contractors and the UN – May 19, 2010

From the Global Policy Forum Website

On 19th May 2010, GPF hosted a lunchtime discussion on Private Security Contractors and their involvement with the United Nations….

 …..In January 2010, the UN announced it would hire a British private security firm to protect its staff in Afghanistan. This contradicted past statements made by UN officials that condemned PSCs and argued against their use.  As the UN’s relationship with PSCs changes, some crucial questions need answering: how many private security contractors does the UN hire? What does the UN hire PSCs for? What means are being used to monitor them?  And more generally, can the UN be used as a vehicle to make PSCs accountable for their actions?

The Draft International Convention on the Regulation, Oversight and Monitoring Of Private Military and Security Companies has been circulating since 2009, with a UN working group prepared to announce the results of its consultations in September 2010. But even if the UN is able to ratify a convention, does it have the capacity to enforce it?

*****

Click here to listen to James Cockayne, Part One

Jame Cockayne was the first speaker at GPF’s event on Private Security Contractors and the United Nations.  Cockayne addresses three things in his speech: does the United Nations use private security contractors; what policy does the UN have towards private security contractors; and how can the UN, in the future, use strong policy to better regulate private security contractors.

Click here to listen to James Cockayne, Part Two

*****

Click here to listen to Scott Horton – Part One

Scott Horton was the second speaker at this event.  Horton’s experiences as a journalist and New York attornee, gave valuable insight to the role Private Security Contractors play in global conflict.  Horton focussed particuarly on the PSCs and the use of unmanned drones.

Click here to listen to Scott_Horton – Part Two

Link to Global Policy Forum here.

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Industry Talk: What Memorial Day Means To A Security Contractor

A memorial on campus at Xe honors fallen comrades. 

*****

What Memorial Day Means To A Security Contractor

5/30/2010

     What does Memorial Day mean to a security contractor?  Well for one, it is an American holiday, so I imagine that American security contractors would be more in the position of remembrance than any other contractors from other countries.  But under contract with companies who work for US DoD, DoS, etc., many contractors from other countries have died.  That includes local nationals like Iraqis or Afghanis, or third country nationals who include everyone else. I guess my point is that do we only recognize the sacrifice of American fallen during this day, when so many have died in support of America and this global war?  Or do these contractors only get recognized by their country for their sacrifice in this war, and we only focus on American contractors during our Memorial Day? Because on this day and in this war, a security contractor has many deaths to remember and pay respects to.

   For one, a security contractor in this war usually is a military veteran and from the combat arms.  So more than likely, they knew men or women that died in the war when they were in the military.  When that veteran got out of the military and went back into service as a security contractor, they might have been in a position to lose fellow contractors as well.  Those fallen contractors could be American, or they could be South African, or they could be some Iraqi team member. It could be all three in an attack, and an IED does not discriminate.  The common bond between all parties is the service given during the war and the companies they worked for.

   So the question comes up again.  What does Memorial Day mean to a security contractor?  Well to me it is a remembrance for all of those who died in the first Gulf War (I was a Marine in this war). I also have a profound respect for all the fallen soldiers of all other wars the US has been in.  It is not a day of picnics on the lake, or sales at shopping centers.  Memorial Day is a somber day, in which you are reminded that you are the lucky one who lived, and those that are in the ground are the ones who did not.

   Then there is the other side of me who is a security contractor.  As a contractor, I remember three groups who have all made sacrifices.  I remember the Iraqi jundis that I worked with who were killed in the war.  I remember the South African I worked with who was killed.  And I remember the Americans I worked with who were killed.  All of these deaths are sacrifices that have meaning to me and to my fellow contractors who worked in those companies and on those contracts.

   On this day I give equal attention to both the military deaths and contractor deaths, and that is what Memorial Day means to a security contractor.  The difference between the sacrifice of both sides, is that the military deaths are paid the ultimate respect by society, and the contractor deaths are ignored by society.  There are no holidays dedicated to fallen security contractors, no monuments at the Mall in Washington DC for security contractors, and no special headstones for fallen security contractors in cemeteries.  If anything, a fallen security contractor is buried with a headstone that has dedications to their military service.

   But that is changing, and private industry has found ways to remember the fallen.  For an example, the company Xe (Blackwater) has a memorial for it’s fallen contractors.  I imagine that the families and friends of fallen Xe contractors will be going to this memorial as well as to the cemetery where that individual was buried on Memorial Day.  So that is two places for the friends and family to go and bravo to Xe for building such a thing.

   Still, there is nothing in the US that is dedicated to contractors who have perished in the war. There isn’t even an accurate accounting of all the contractors that have been killed in this war.  At this time, I can’t even give a statistic like who was the first security contractor or regular contractor killed in the war. Were they an expat, local national, or third country national?  I could speculate or maybe just go off of wikipedia or icasualties.org, but both of these sites have proven to be insufficient in providing a complete database.  Even the Department of Labor’s count of deaths based on death benefits and insurance claims is incomplete. But we certainly know who was the first soldiers or federal employees to die in the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan.

   Then there is the historical perspective on contractor deaths in war. Is there a monument or memorial for the privateers that were killed during the early wars of the US?  Or do their sacrifices not count when it comes to the founding of this country?  How about the thousands of men and women who perished in all of the wars that the US has fought, who worked as contractors (or whatever name given to private industry warriors over the years).  I have made a point of bringing that history back into the discussion about contractors, because these are all sacrifices given during the process of defending and supporting the US over the years, and that should mean something.

   Perhaps one day congress will recognize the sacrifice of private industry during times of war. A monument that serves to recognize all types of contractors, and from all countries, who have all participated in and died in our wars.  I could not foresee the names of all of those contractors on a monument like this, because unfortunately there is no list for such a thing. Either way, a monument would be a great way to show that contractors are not forgotten and that their sacrifice does matter.

    So to answer the question I brought up in the beginning. Memorial Day for me is a remembrance for both the military and civilian deaths in this war, and wars past. I also remember those who died who were not only Americans, but were from other countries. And when I walk through a cemetery and see the head stones with crosses and military honors on them, I also think about the civilian contractors out there who were killed in the war that have nothing on their head stones to identify their service. If there is a monument locally where a veterans group is putting on a ceremony, I often like attending those.  Guys like myself pay their respects in ways that best suit them.  I like to write, and this blog gives me the opportunity to pay tribute.

    Others might be overseas working during this day, and paying tribute could mean attending a ceremony on some FOB or outpost.  In this digital age, many go on to the forums and pay their respect online. Contractors remember their fallen brothers when they were in the military, and they remember their fallen brothers in the various companies they have worked for. Most of all, military veterans and contractors remember their dead every day, and it doesn’t take a holiday to remind them to do so. But it is a day designed to put attention on war time sacrifice, and reminds those who have not served or have not lost someone that such a sacrifice exists.  That is Memorial Day for a security contractor, and my personal thoughts on the matter. Rest in peace to the fallen. –Matt

Friday, May 28, 2010

Publications: Contractor Support Of U.S. Operations In USCENTCOM AOR, Iraq, And Afghanistan-As Of May 2010

   Boy, if these guys wanted to do something really smart, they would publish this stuff on Scribd.  Then guys like me could put the report up on the blog and folks can quickly scan through it here.  Or make your graphics into JPEGs or something. Help me, to help you get the word out is all.

   So with this report, there was really no surprises.  Increases of contractors in Afghanistan, and a slight decrease in contractors in Iraq. That and we are still at a quarter million strong overseas, and that is pretty impressive given all the talk about trying to get rid of us.(not to mention the contractors with other agencies/departments) It looks to me like we are still pretty important to the war effort, regardless of whatever party in control at the White House.

    One thing to point out is this number does not include contractors working for other agencies. That number is probably pretty big as well.  Now if they can only keep track of how many of us have died or have been wounded in the war. Because as it stands, that effort has been pathetic and entirely disrespectful to the those that gave all.

     Also, check out the rest of the publication by following the links below if you want.  They mention the typical stuff they have promised to do year after year, when it comes to regulating contractors. Talk is cheap, and I sometimes wonder if government purposely wants to do a poor job or purposely chooses not to do the very things they keep saying they need to do? You have plenty of reports, plenty of studies, plenty of expert testimony and recommendations as to what needs to happen.  Now do it and quit talking about it. Pffffft. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Contractor Support of U.S. Operations in USCENTCOM AOR, Iraq, and Afghanistan-as of May 2010

This update reports DoD contractor personnel numbers in theater and outlines DoD efforts to improve management of contractors accompanying U.S. forces.  It covers DoD contractor personnel deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) area of responsibility (AOR).

Ending 2nd quarter FY 2010, USCENTCOM reported approximately 250,335 contractor personnel working for the DoD in the USCENTCOM AOR.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress