Feral Jundi

Monday, December 21, 2009

Media News: So Why Aren’t Contractors Represented At American Forces Network?

AFN

   The other day I was thinking, why aren’t contractors represented at American Forces Network?  There are thousands of us overseas, and we have been a part of the war effort for years now.  So where is the acknowledgement of our existence at AFN?

   I say this, because every contractor that has ever been to Iraq or Afghanistan, has been exposed to AFN.  We watch all the DoD commercials about safety or suicide prevention or wearing reflector belts on bases, yet there is nothing about contractors.  I think the only commercial I have ever seen dealing with contractors, is a hotline that troops can call if they see contractors ripping off the government.  I wonder if there are any commercials that give information on how to turn in troops who are ripping off the DoD?  Or are contractors the only ones that can do harm?

   Furthermore, you watch all these shows like the Pentagon Channel or the Marines or Army Show, and it is great to see news about what they are doing in the war, but what about the thousands of contractors performing important and essential missions as well?  How about the guys training Afghan Army or Border Patrol folks? Isn’t that a crucial element to the strategy in Afghanistan, yet the contractor side of this is completely ignored?

     How about the munitions clearance programs, or the interpreters, or the dining facility folks?  Where’s the Christmas messages from the various company management out there? Or the thanks from Generals or Congressmen for the work we have done?  I mean you guys contracted our services, are you not thankful for that service?

   I guess my point is, is that we continue to be treated as if we do not exist, or that we really don’t matter in this war.  The reality is that we do matter and we do have a great impact on this war.  And for the DoD to not at least use AFN to communicate with their contractor force, is just stupid.

   They could be developing public service messages that communicate directly to contractors.  The DoD can also target contractors with their resiliency messages, to prevent any future Fitzsimmons type incidents.  There is so much that needs to be said and communicated to my group, yet there is silence. If in fact the DoD wants to make contracting work in this war, they need to connect with us.  To not take advantage of this media tool to create a unity of effort in this war, is yet again, a strategic mistake.

   The irony of it all, is that AFN uses civilians and contractors in the production of their shows. But shhhhh, don’t tell anyone. lol –Matt

Film: Avatar is CGI Cool, But PMC’s Are Once Again The Bad Guys

Filed under: Film — Tags: , , , , , , , — Matt @ 9:19 AM

   Thanks to Christian Lowe for the review.  This movie sounds impressive, but yet again, Holly-weird has decided to portray private industry as the bad guy. Pffft. For that, I will more than likely watch this movie as a rental or at the cheap theater in town when it gets there.

   This gets old, and it is a slap in the face of the thousands of contractors currently in the war, who have served in the war at one point or another, and most importantly, have been killed or maimed in this war.  Thanks James Cameron for nothing. Next. –Matt

—————————————————–

Avatar

Avatar Thrills, but Troops Take Hit

Military.com – Christian Lowe

Dec 17, 2009

It’s pretty simple.

Spend a gazillion dollars on computer animators; concoct an entirely new language, throw the whole thing on another planet with ten-foot-tall aliens that ride dragons and plug into their extraterrestrial horses with biological data cables and add some jet-hovering, super-fortress gunships, belt-fed blasters, and latter day V-22s and you’ve got yourself a pretty good action movie formula, right?

Now make it all 3-D.

That’s exactly what writer/director James Cameron (Aliens, Titanic) tried to do with what is reportedly the most expensive film ever produced. His latest movie Avatar — which opens in U.S. theaters today — certainly lives up to its billing as a visceral assault on the senses. Think of the most gut-wrenching roller coaster ride of your life — and stretch it two and a half hours.

(more…)

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Afghanistan: Up To 56,000 More Contractors Likely For Afghanistan, CRS Says

   This is a continuation from yesterday’s post about the CRS report.  You don’t hear this figure in all the crazy surge talk, but you sure do hear a lot about the troop surge or civilian surge.  I guess we are not surge-worthy? lol

   What I thought was interesting in the report, is that they don’t know how many security contractors there are in Afghanistan, but the report promises that this data will be in the next report.  Hmmmm.  Suspicious.

   There used to be data for this. They have the numbers for Iraq at about 12,684 security contractors at this time. –Matt

——————————————————————–

Up to 56,000 more contractors likely for Afghanistan, congressional agency says

By Walter PincusWednesday, December 16, 2009

The surge of 30,000 U.S. troops into Afghanistan could be accompanied by a surge of up to 56,000 contractors, vastly expanding the presence of personnel from the U.S. private sector in a war zone, according to a study by the Congressional Research Service.

CRS, which provides background information to members of Congress on a bipartisan basis, said it expects an additional 26,000 to 56,000 contractors to be sent to Afghanistan. That would bring the number of contractors in the country to anywhere from 130,000 to 160,000.

The tally “could increase further if the new [administration] strategy includes a more robust construction and nation building effort,” according to the report, which was released Monday and first disclosed on the Web site Talking Points Memo.

(more…)

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Publications: CRS Contractors Study, as of December 2009

Law Enforcement: Unease As Security Groups Take Police Roles in the UK

   You guys will get used to it.  This is more indication of governments and law enforcement hemming and hawing about the monopoly on the application of the use of force.  I think there is plenty of room on the stage for private industry and the state to share.

    If anything, I think folks are just worried about competition, and that is what really drives these other conversations about ‘pushing the boundaries’ or whatever. It would be like the US Postal Service freaking out about Fedex or UPS, two private shipping companies who directly compete with the US government services.  There is plenty of work for everyone, and both sides are still in existence. Both sides have their place, and likewise for the private security industry and law enforcement. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Unease as security groups take police roles

By James Boxell

December 14 2009

Private security companies have started “pushing the boundaries” of frontline law enforcement and are becoming involved in highly charged areas such as the policing of protests, the Financial Times has learnt.

G4S, the FTSE 100 security group, has provided mobile custody cells and detention officers at two recent environmental demonstrations. It has also begun to supply full teams of investigators on complex criminal cases, another area that will prove contentious with some chief constables.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress