Feral Jundi

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

China: The Cyberwar Between Google and China

Filed under: China,Technology — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 5:59 AM

   Interesting deal between Google and China.  Although the real winner here will be China’s search engine called Baidu.  You can bet that any telecom stuff that Google was planning on doing in China, will probably suffer as well.

   The real story though, is the whole concept of a mega corporation like Google, taking on a super power like China?  Thomas Ricks was pretty intrigued by the concept as well.  Time to break out the pre-Westphalia rule book, and start implementing cyber privateer hacking to go after these state sponsored hackers. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Security specialist ‘has evidence of Chinese attack on Google’

A US computer expert says he has found the ‘digital fingerprints’ of Chinese authors on the tools used to launch recent attacks against Google

By Claudine Beaumont, Technology Editor20 Jan 2010

Joe Stewart, a security specialist with SecureWorks in the US, told the New York Times that he had analysed the software used to attack Google, and found that the main program used by the hackers contained a module based on an algorithm that appeared in a Chinese technical document that has been published exclusively on Chinese-language websites.

Google last week announced that the accounts of human rights activists and political dissidents had been hacked, and that it believed the attacks had originated from China. However, details about the precise nature of the attacks were not revealed, although security experts broadly agreed that Google was probably correct in its suspicions.

It is thought that a Trojan virus, known as Hydraq, was responsible for opening a “back door” in to compromised computers, which could then be used by hackers to access and take control of a machine without the owner’s permission or knowledge.

Stewart uses a method known as a “reverse engineering” to unravel malicious software, viruses and Trojans to identify how and where they originated. He looks for patterns in the code, and for unusual algorithms used by hackers to error-check transmitted data.

However, Stewart said that he could not rule out the possibility that the programmers behind the Google hack had laid a false trail that pointed to Chinese involvement in order to disguise the fact they originated from another country or government.

“But Occam’s Razor suggests that the simplest explanation is probably the best one,” he told the New York Times.

Story here.

——————————————————————

Hackers create opportunity for military firms

Attacks on Google boost the market for cyber-security just as government weapons spending is expected to slow. Military firms are retooling for rising demand by corporations as well as government.

By W.J. Hennigan

January 19, 2010

For U.S. military firms, the latest revelations of highly sophisticated hacker attacks on Google Inc. are highlighting a new reality, and a potentially lucrative business: The battlefield is shifting to cyberspace.

(more…)

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Industry Talk: Good Year For Private Security, By Jody Ray Bennett

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 6:26 AM

   Excellent little review about the state of affairs for the private security industry last year.  What I found interesting, was the details about all the acquisitions. I think of the quote about buying stocks–‘blood in the streets’, when I hear about Securitas gobbling up companies that are for sale during this recession.  It’s smart, and they will probably do very well as soon as the global recession starts to turn. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Good Year for Private Security

19 Jan 2010

By Jody Ray Bennett for ISN Security Watch

While last year closed with new security threats, 2010 looks better than ever for giant, private security companies, Jody Ray Bennett writes for ISN Security Watch.

The world’s largest defense contractor, Lockheed Martin, received an early Christmas present last year when it was awarded an $841.9 million contract to supply 24 F-16 fighter jets to the Kingdom of Morocco. According to reports, Morocco is paying $35 million per aircraft, “which includes advanced countermeasures, electronic warfare and support equipment.”

The defense industry feared losses after the Obama administration cut costly, technologically risky and often developmentally delayed defense programs that were manufactured by Lockheed and its subcontractors. However, market analysts predict that this new contract will “boost […] the company, which had shrunk to $76.4 billion [in] fiscal 2009 from $80.9 billion at year-end fiscal 2008.”

But while Morocco has been searching to strengthen its military forces, the North African country is having difficulty attracting foreign investment, primarily from neighboring Gulf states, due to “poor infrastructure, lack of proper legal framework and excessive red tape.” As intra-national security is a deep concern for potential investors, the monarchy has been looking to strengthen security in its largest cities in order to attract foreign capital.

(more…)

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Haiti: Doctors Leave Hospital Do To Security Concerns, Reports Of Looting And Violence

   This is heartbreaking to hear.  I know there is an entire industry ready to answer the call for security needs, and we will. It’s just the flood gates need to be opened, much like they were opened during Katrina, to get the ball going. Eventually, NGOs and the like will figure it out that they actually need folks like us in order to accomplish their mission. And as the Belgian doctors are figuring out, you can’t depend on others for security, you have to insure your operation has it, and that takes planning and initiative. It also takes putting away your ego and your misconceptions about folks like us, and rationally figuring out how to use us for your operation. And from the sounds of it, at least the media had private security with them. (bravo to the team that is protecting Dr. Sanja Gupta and his crew)

   And now that the U.S. Military has committed to this disaster with a heavy duty response, I wonder about our current strategic needs to protect the homeland or staff our other ‘projects’?  Two wars, and now this major disaster that will require a long term military presence, will certainly put the military in a less flexible stance.  How could it not?

   So with that said, one would have to expect that security contractors, as well as other contractor types, will more than likely make up the difference. We will keep our eye on this, and this industry will certainly answer the call, like we always do.

   I just hope that those that are reading this, and just entering this game called security contracting, understand that Jundism will be vital for you and your contract, in order to make our contribution to the war and these disasters, honorable and essential. –Matt

——————————————————————

Security concerns cause doctors to leave hospital, quake victims

January 16, 2010

Port-au-Prince, Haiti (CNN) — Earthquake victims, writhing in pain and grasping at life, watched doctors and nurses walk away from a field hospital Friday night after a Belgian medical team evacuated the area, saying it was concerned about security.

The decision left CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Sanjay Gupta as the only doctor at the hospital to get the patients through the night.

CNN initially reported, based on conversations with some of the doctors, that the United Nations ordered the Belgian First Aid and Support Team to evacuate. However, Belgian Chief Coordinator Geert Gijs, a doctor who was at the hospital with 60 Belgian medical personnel, said it was his decision to pull the team out for the night. Gijs said he requested U.N. security personnel to staff the hospital overnight, but was told that peacekeepers would only be able to evacuate the team.

(more…)

Saturday, January 16, 2010

History: Private Security Contractors And Disaster Relief–2005 And Now

    I wanted to bring up some recent history about our group.  David Isenberg just posted a great story about contractors and disaster relief, with a mention of Feral Jundi, and I figured I would give that audience coming over a little something extra to chew on.

   Although I would like to briefly expand on David’s post with some history. Companies have done pro-bono work for disasters, and Blackwater was a prime example of that.  They saved 121 people by plucking them off of their roofs with their helicopter during the mad early days of Hurricane Katrina, as well as hauling 11 tons of life saving supplies.  That was done out of pocket, and serves as just one example of a company trying to do the right thing and providing ‘pro-bono’ services.

   Then there are the hundreds of individual contractors that have medical skills, search and rescue skills or dog handling backgrounds, who are joining teams to go on over to the island in order to help.  Or there are the contractors that are going over with church groups or other NGO’s, who are doing what they can to help out and serve.  Then there are the contractors who are on contract right now, in places like Iraq and Afghanistan, that are sending money online.  We have a heart, and we do care, despite what some might say about us.  We also have a ton of pertinent skills for these kinds of disasters.

   As for the security related responses, that is a little different.  During the Katrina disaster, and certainly during this disaster, all the news agencies contract with individuals and small companies for security.  That is the hypocrisy of the MSM. They will write scathing articles about the larger contractor companies, and then turn around and contract with smaller companies and individuals for their security when they go galloping around the world. They do the same thing in war zones, and it has always kind of rubbed me the wrong way.  Ironically, these same security folks they hire, usually do work in the big companies like Blackwater or Triple Canopy as contractors. Why, because they have to feed their families too, and work is work.  Oooooh, the horror……pfffft.

   But back to Private Security Contractors and Disaster Relief.  The response in Katrina was amazing.  Companies responded quickly and they got boots on the ground, armed and ready to go.  Some companies went in heavily armed in the beginning, and then graduated to a lesser security posture as the threat level decreased.  I remember this shock that people had, that war zone contractors were in New Orleans, and that they are walking around with guns.  Those in the media that were contractor haters, really drummed up this image that BW was running around out of control in New Orleans.  Of course that was crap, and all they were trying to do was bringing order to chaos.

   What happened in New Orleans, was a total break down of law in that town, and a total failure of the local leadership to provide order. (sounds like Haiti? huh)  Private security contractors were brought in, along with the military and numerous other law enforcement agencies, to stop the looting and to protect the aid workers and people from any threats.  And the security response to that incident was excellent.  I am positive that if we did not have that kind of response, there would have been more crime and more lives lost. Aid workers and rescue folks would be more fearful for their lives, as opposed to rescuing people, and that is why security was so vital in places where there has been a complete breakdown in society.

   Now with Haiti, that place was a failed state already.  Now with the earthquake and all the death and destruction, those people are going to be even more desperate and irrational. Disasters like this, bring out the best and worst in humans, and security professionals are essential to provide order to the chaos.

   That is why security is going to be vital in Haiti, and why all types of security are going to be necessary there.  Send in the Marines, the Army, the UN, and PSC/PMC’s, all with the idea of keeping the peace and protecting the innocent.  As we speak, there are hundreds of security contractors already contracted individually by the media or aid groups, all managing the security of those groups. Hell, there were already contractors there, providing services before this disaster, complete with offices and licenses.

   I also want to mention the contractors that will be assisting in the rebuilding effort.  The same warzone contractors that build and support there, will no doubt be answering the call for Haiti.  PAE has an office in Haiti, and from what I have heard on the forums, they are still accounting for people.  There were also the folks supporting the UN effort there, so contractors are already there.  My heart goes out to those victims, as well as the UN victims, and all of the Haitian victims of this disaster.  Everyone has lost people in this deal.

   Hopefully, larger companies will assemble teams to provide security and logistics for larger operations there. The irony with that, is a journalist being protected by some retired SF trooper, will probably write a scathing article about warzone contractors in Haiti, terrorizing the locals and causing all sorts of problems.  Bottom line, security contractors are sheepdogs, and they will do what they do best in this disaster. They will find a way to help, to protect, to give and to serve, just like everyone else who cares about helping the Haitians. –Matt

Edit: 01/16/2010 – It sounds like all the PAE folks are accounted for, and everyone is ok.  I also heard on the forums that they are looking for folks for long term work in Haiti for the rebuild.

——————————————————————-

From the Virginian Pilot

Bill Sizemore

September 15, 2005

“Anne Duke, a Blackwater spokeswoman, said Wednesday that the company has about 200 personnel in the hurricane-ravaged area. The vast majority – 164 employees – are working under a contract with the Federal Protective Service, a division of the Department of Homeland Security, to protect government facilities. The 30-day contract can be extended indefinitely, she said.

Under a separate contract, the company supplied an airplane to the Coast Guard, Duke said, and also provided a helicopter at no charge to support Coast Guard rescue missions. As of Monday, Blackwater air crews had moved more than 11 tons of supplies and rescued 121 people, she said.”

Read the rest of story here.

——————————————————————-

Private Security Contractors Head to Gulf

By Griff WitteWashington Post Staff WriterThursday, September 8, 2005

Companies in the Gulf Coast area hit by Hurricane Katrina are turning to an unusual source to protect people and property rendered vulnerable by the storm’s damage — private security contractors that specialize in supporting military operations in war-torn countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan.

(more…)

Friday, January 15, 2010

Montana: Private Security Considered After TSA Failures At Bozeman Airport, And Other City Airports

Filed under: Industry Talk,Montana — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 10:00 AM

    “Again, it’s because you can fire a bad contractor, but you can’t fire the government. I think TSA stands for Thousands Standing Around.” -John Stossel 

*****

   First off, bravo to Dick Roehm for at least taking a realistic approach to security at his airport.  If they cannot depend upon the TSA to provide good security, along with good customer service and satisfaction, then I say go private and demand those things via a well written contract.  Europe, along with Israel, has been doing this awhile, and to me, the TSA along with government is a terrible security apparatus to use.

   As for Jim McGarvey, stop drinking the kool aid that the contractor haters have been serving you, and listen to reason.  Better yet, just read the quote up top, and tell me how with the current system in place, that you can actually fire the TSA for doing a poor job? Besides, the argument that the town will lose jobs when they go private is stupid.  Who do you think private companies will hire for work locally?

   The other thing that bothers me about Jim’s assessment is the idea that making a profit is evil or something?  Profit is what drives a company and it’s employees to be competitive and do a good job in order to maintain the contract.  If they suck at what they are doing, or try to rip off the airport, the airport authority just ends the contract and goes with someone that can do a better job.  And hey, if the AA writes up a good contract and actually monitors the quality of the contract, then they can actually get a good value for the dollar.  The company providing the service also knows what it has to do in order to maintain the contract when you have that kind of a system.  Like Stossel said, you can fire a bad contractor, but you can’t fire the government. –Matt

——————————————————————–

Security breach raises questions about government airport screening

January 13, 2010

By DANIEL PERSON Chronicle Staff Writer

A passenger getting through security at Gallatin Field with a gun, coupled with ongoing complaints about how passengers are treated at checkpoints, is trying the patience of the head of the local airport authority.

Now, Dick Roehm is raising the prospect turning to a private company to handle security at the airport.

On the morning of Sunday, Dec. 13, Transportation Security Administration screeners at Gallatin Field inadvertently allowed a man with a firearm in his carry-on bag through security, according to a TSA statement released Wednesday.

While in the boarding area, the unidentified man realized he had the gun and turned himself into TSA officials. In response, TSA rescreened every passenger at the airport, including passengers on a Horizon Air flight that had left the gate but not yet taken off, delaying three flights for more than an hour, said Roehm, who was briefed on the incident.

The gun was turned over to local law enforcement and the passenger was allowed to continue on the flight, TSA spokesman Dwayne Baird said in a written statement.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress