Feral Jundi

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Maritime Security: Company Spotlight, Espada Logistics and Security Group

Filed under: Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 12:06 PM

Edit: 06/09/2011- At this time, Feral Jundi does not endorse this company.  I have received multiple negative reports from contractors that have worked in this company, and I am not at all impressed with the way they are operating. Buyer beware….Feel free to email me if you have any questions.

 

Espada Logistics and Security Group Expands Its Maritime Security Operations to Combat Pirates in the Gulf of Aden

Wednesday December 10

Espada Logistics and Security Group (www.espadaservices.com), a privately held company, announced today that it has expanded its base of operation from South America to the Gulf of Aden by providing onsite security and consulting services to the maritime industry.

“Despite the increase in military patrols from NATO, Russia and the Indian Navy, Somali pirates have increased their attacks against the ships that transit this region,” Jim Jorrie, the president of Espada Logistics and Security Group, said.

“This was a natural fit for us as we already had a large roster of ex-Special Forces personnel with anti-piracy and anti-insurgent operations experience,” Jorrie added. “Our desire is avoid a conflict in the first place, but if necessary our highly trained and experienced team members can quickly and successfully defend a customer’s assets from a pirate attack.”

(more…)

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Maritime Security: Somali Privateers?

Filed under: Maritime Security — Tags: , , — Matt @ 1:45 PM

    Boy, that would be great if these guys were Privateers.  Then we would know who to deal with, that contracted these guys.  The world shipping industry could also plan their shipping, based on the objectives and laws being enforced by these privateers.  But what business, group, country is endorsing these guys?  And what exactly are their objectives and what legal authority do they have? And based on the world wide reaction to this, you guys have no support.

    I have some questions for Nasr.  If these Somali pirates are in fact privateers, then who gave them the letter of marque to do what they are doing?  And if their job is to protect the fishing waters off the coast of Somalia, then how is taking down an Oil Transporting Super Tanker, 400 plus miles off the coast of Somalia, accomplishing that job?  Did a business give them a letter of marque, did the government give this authority, or what?  Privateers would indicate some kind of attempt at maintaining a law or the sovereignty of a country, or defeating the enemy of a country.  To me, the activities of these thugs indicate no such thing. 

    Also, it sounds to me like these ‘privateers’ are stealing from local Somali fishermen, and not specifically targeting illegal foreign fishermen.  That is criminal, to steal from the people of Somalia, yet that is what they are doing.  Also, foreign fishing vessels would not risk going into the lawless and dangerous waters of Somalia.  If they did, they were idiots, because they would have no hope of protection under some rule of law.   

   The other problem I have with this, is who are these guys privateering for?  Because if they were actually privateers of a government, then it looks like to me that the Somali government is purposely attacking foreign vessels, not because of fishing violations, but because they want to steal from them or extort them with hostage taking. And what authority do they have, to do this in International waters? And who is the enemy or target of the government in this case?  

    Now if these privateers are being sponsored by local business, then what is the business and who are the owners?  Because in the west, we call businesses that hire pirates to loot boats out to 400 miles plus off the coast in international waters, organized crime.  Of course if that business was endorsed by the government, then we are back to question of the Somali government blessing this activity and what the government’s intent was.  Is the whole world the enemy, and is this why all ships are fair game for this activity?   

   Whatever the case, this is piracy in my view and in the majority of the world’s view.  Until these businesses or the government comes forward to claim responsibility for contracting with these privateers, they are still called pirates.  These pirates have no morale authority what so ever when they attack vessels and rob from them or take hostages for ransom, and do all of this well beyond Somalia’s coastal waters, out in International waters.  

    Also, this kind of ties into my article I posted below about privateers.  During the US Revolutionary war, our privateers had a clear objective, a specific enemy, and had total endorsement by my young country.  If in fact Somalia is claiming these privateers as theirs, then come forward and proclaim what the objective is and who is your enemy?

     Or maybe a non-state actor is contracting these privateers.  Perhaps Islamic extremists are the ones who are using these supposed privateers, and this is what is really going on.  Although then we go back to why would they take down a Saudi owned Super Tanker in International waters?  

   Bottom line, these are not privateers, these are pirates who if anything are working for organized crime in Somalia.  The country of Somalia is a failed state, and crime flourishes in failed states.  Extremists groups like Al Qaeda, love to set up shop in failed states, because there is no rule of law to hinder their presence or stop their training and operations.  It would not surprise me if extremist groups were contracting with privateers, but I mostly point my finger at organized crime and a country’s inability to stop that crime. So Nasr, your argument is crap. –Head Jundi 

—————————————————————— 

The Unlicensed and Undocumented Privateers of Somalia

9 Dec 9, 2008 

By Nasr Ibn Othmann 

I must admit that I was rather amused when I first encountered the phrase Unlicensed and Undocumented Privateers of Somalia. When I reflected upon these words for a moment, I realised that this is the perfect description of the noble men who currently guard the marine resource of the Somali nation. It is true that they have attained global fame, and that their exploits are being reported in all corners of the world. However, we must never tolerate the blatant racism that underpins the usage of words like Somali Pirates, or Islamic Pirates. We, the Somali people, must never tolerate the speculative statements, of so-called journalist experts, who earn their pay by dreaming up potential linkages between international terrorism and the honourable business of protecting Somali territorial waters.

(more…)

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Maritime Security: Anti Piracy Maritime Security Services (Non-Lethal)

Filed under: Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , — Matt @ 1:50 AM

   This is the press release by the company in regards to that incident where the guards abandoned ship off the coast of Somalia after being attacked by pirates.  I am kind of curious, how do you use “sustained non-lethal resistance” against RPG’s and AK 47’s? I also love how the company really promotes the “non-lethal” concept all over the website.  I wonder how many Somali pirates cruise the internet, and read this stuff?  I imagine with all that money they keep getting off of take downs, they have bought not only sat phones and GPS units, but also computers. Hell, Ali is probably reading this stuff on his brand new Mac, while chewing on some Khat right now.

     I will say it. This is crap.  To sell this concept of non-lethal security services, in a very lethal area, is just crap.  It is wrong to sell the shipping companies on the concept, it is pathetic that the shipping companies are buying off on this, it is almost criminal to put your guard’s lives at risk like this, and a contractor that signed on for this kind of job should know better. Not to mention that the client is getting some terrible protective service for the money.

  My feelings about this is simple, defend the ship and the client with the appropriate force(lethal in this situation), and get out of this business of using less than lethal in really dangerous places.  Obviously the LRAD and water cannon did not work in this situation, and the pirates are wising up.  God help us if they decide to wear ear plugs and a scuba mask on future attacks? –Matt

——————————————————————-

MV BISCAGLIA : PIRATE ATTACK 28 Nov 08

APMSS PRESS RELEASE 2

15:00 UTC 28th Nov 2008

Nick Davis, Director of APMSS, has issued the following statement:

Attributable quote

“APMSS security team embarked upon MV BISCAGLIA came under sustained and heavy attack from pirates earlier this morning. Reports remain confused however we believe that the embarked 3 man APMSS security team (comprising former British military servicemen) were able to mount sustained, non-lethal, resistance, denying the attacker’s access to the ship long enough for the ship’s operating crew to seek safety below decks and to summon assistance from coalition warships.

Reports suggest that the security team were only finally overwhelmed when attackers gained access to the ship and continued to fire upon the embarked security team.

I have spoken with my team leader on the phone and he informs me that the level of violence was unprecedented and forced them reluctantly to leave the vessel after every effort was made to ensure the safety of the ships crew, further whilst in the water the security team were again fired upon. The hijacked vessel with pirates in control then attempted to run them down”

(more…)

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Maritime Security: To the Shores of Tripoli..

Filed under: Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , — Matt @ 1:11 PM

     A great little article about how we used to do things, when it came to pirates. Send the Marines and some Mercenaries, and attack the land bases of these pirates.  That and stop paying these ransoms, because it only encourages these guys.

     Now do I see an Obama administration sending troops to the shores of Somalia, just like we did in 1804? Or will the memory of our efforts in Somalia in the early nineties kick in, and prevent us from  doing what we need to do?  

     I don’t see us doing anything on land because of the bitter memory of our last venture there, but you never know.  If piracy becomes a money making tactic of the mufsid dorks, then we might see more of an effort to combat it as part of the overall war strategy.  More than likely, it will continue to be treated as a criminal thing, and ships will be on their own and the various navies involved will only have a partial impact on protecting them all.        

     Although, if we are to learn anything from history, we must deal with the land component of piracy as part of an overall strategy, if we are truly serious about combating it.  –Head Jundi

—————————————————————— 

Shores of Tripoli 

To the Shores of Tripoli . . .

The place to stop pirates is on the beaches.

by Seth Cropsey

12/08/2008, Volume 014, Issue 12

The November 15 hijacking 450 miles east of Mombasa, Kenya, of a thousand-plus foot oil tanker carrying more than two million barrels of crude oil forced international recognition that the seas have been dramatically added to the world’s list of outlaw space. According to the International Maritime Bureau, recorded attacks by pirates in the Gulf of Aden area have more than tripled–to 92–in the past year. The million square mile swath of the Indian Ocean off, and south of, the Somali coast through which approximately 20,000 ships a year pass between Asia, Europe, and the Western Hemisphere is within hailing distance of smaller, but no less significant, portions of the Middle East and South/Central Asia whose lawlessness has produced important consequences around the world. The prospect of a large-scale meeting of lawless land and lawless sea would be especially troubling even if the possible failed state in the middle–Pakistan–didn’t possess nuclear weaponry.

But for now, the problem is that Somali pirates who use global positioning devices to help identify potential targets, who deploy “mother” ships that can venture out to sea to launch and recover small fast boats, and who have mastered simple but effective tactics for capturing ships have transformed one of the world’s strategic choke points into a watery version of the Cyclops’ island home, a place without law. The consequences transcend what is already happening: spiking maritime insurance rates, significantly increased costs to international consumers as shipping lines reroute around the Cape of Good Hope, and a growing problem of captured ships’ crews held hostage in Somali pirate havens–330 crew members from 25 nations at last count.

(more…)

Friday, November 28, 2008

Maritime Security: Somali Pirates Hijack Ship, British Guards Escape

Filed under: Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , — Matt @ 1:51 PM

    Boy, on the surface, the story does not sound good.  Why are the guards jumping ship, and leaving their client to the mercy of pirates?  And how did these guards miss this one?  Most of all, were they even armed to defend the ship?  Lots of questions about this incident, and I will not judge before I hear everything.  

   Like I have said before, sooner or later these pirates will catch on to the fact that most of these security companies that are posting guards on these ships are lightly armed, or worse yet, just outfitting them with less than lethal stuff like the LRAD.  These guys are smart, and they will do all they can to sneak up on these ships.  They will pose as coast guards, or a distressed ship in need of help, and as soon as they can get up on the craft, they will board. It is a tactic as old as the sea, and in my opinion, we need to start learning some of these ancient lessons on how to deal with pirates. –Head Jundi 

——————————————————————- 

Somali pirates hijack ship, British guards escape

By KATHARINE HOURELD 

November 28, 2008

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — Somali pirates hijacked a chemical tanker with dozens of Indian crew members on board Friday, and three British security guards were rescued by helicopter after jumping into the sea, officials said.

A warship on patrol nearby had sent helicopters to intervene in the attack, but they arrived after pirates had taken control of the Liberian-flagged ship, diplomatic officials said on condition of anonymity, as they were not authorized to speak with media.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress