Feral Jundi

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Company Spotlight: Triton International And The Somaliland Coastguard

There have been several measures of success. First, in 2010 alone, the Triton-trained Somaliland Coastguard captured, prosecuted, and jailed more than 120 pirates. Officials in Somaliland have said that pirates rarely cross into their waters from renowned pirate havens in the region due to the Coastguard’s reputation for intercepting them. Second, as a result of these measures, the World Food Program considers Berbera a safe port for the delivery and distribution of food aid destined for the region. Finally, the Coastguard has also intercepted vessels intending to conduct IUU fishing.

There are two great articles below and be sure to check them out. The first one is written by the CEO of Triton International describing their training program for the Somaliland Coastguard and the second article is more recent and describes the cost effectiveness of the program.

The thing to emphasize here is that this company is providing a much needed service, and anything that can professionalize the navies and coastguards in Somalia to do this work will only help in the overall strategy of reducing piracy.

On the other hand, the danger of professionalizing these forces is that they leave the coastguard and go on to be pirates themselves. Still, something must be done, and as long as the Somaliland paymasters keep paying the troops and keeping them happy, they will stick around.

As to the company Triton and how much business they are getting, I am not sure. Maybe some folks from the company would like to come up and talk a little about how they are doing? The below information was about as much as I could find and bravo to them for a job well done training the Somaliland Coastguard. Check it out. –Matt

Triton International logo.

 

Thanks to Nic for providing the photo.

Skulls and Crossroads
November 18, 2010
by Simon Jones
As the skiff approached the bulker, and moved down the flank of the vessel, the crew came to the railings and watched the men, their presence a familiar sight in the Gulf of Aden yet, unlike other skiffs the crew had seen on their regular transits through these waters, and to the crews relief and frequent reassurance, these skiffs were not an attack from pirates, rather the bulkers security escort into the port of Berbera by the Somaliland coastguard, the maritime police force from the breakaway republic in the north west corner of Somalia.
Different Recent History
Somaliland has always maintained its difference and distance from the rest of Somalia, from the colonial period of the British protectorate, brief independence in 1960 and when the attempt to unite with the rest of Somalia failed; during the bloody and destructive civil war, resulting in their withdrawal and the re-establishing of their independence in 1991.
Declaring themselves the independent Republic of Somaliland; a status that despite the total lack of international or UN recognition, has resulted in Somaliland’s 19 years of self governance, independent democratically elected leaders, their own constitution, currency and passport system. In a country that has received little or no International aid or relief support, the ability to protect your borders is essential; when you have 860 Kms of Gulf of Aden coastline, containing ruthless pirates from the neighbouring country – it’s critical.
The Coast Guard
The Somaliland coastguard was established in the first few years of the new millennium from the maritime wing of the Somaliland police service following a rise in smuggling, trafficking and piracy. Its command structure was built on Somaliland veterans of the Somali Navy. Based in the economically strategic port town of Berbera, with their coastline split into three sectors and a total of 14 Coast Guard stations located along the length of the coastline, which are manned by just under 400 Coast Guard personnel.

(more…)

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Maritime Security: JLT In The News–Private Navy To Start Within Five Months

The project, first discussed more than a year ago, experienced some delays in getting a state jurisdiction to register its vessels. Cyprus agreed to add the ships last month, following a U.S. State Department veto for registration in the Marshall Islands, Campbell said.

This is really the only quote I was interested in with this article. Of course JLT and these security contractors have been promising this private navy concept for awhile now, and it all revolves around getting backing from a country and from investors.

What I am interested in though, is Cyprus allowing these vessels to be state registered? That seems pretty close to issuing a Letter of Marque if you ask me? Especially if Cyprus registers these vessels, knowing full well that they will be purposely used for anti-piracy operations and escort duty. That they are endorsing a ‘private navy’.  Even if they have not issued a LoM, they might as well do so anyways, because in effect, Cyprus is blessing a privateer force. (mind you, historically speaking, LoM’s have been issued to early privateers to do exactly what these guys will be doing–escorting commerce through pirate infested waters)

The other thing to bring up here is that there just isn’t enough naval assets out there to cover all of the transits.  The reason for this is the poor economy and a reduction in naval forces and their missions. Especially missions protecting commerce in such a vast operational area. So enter private industry to fill in the void…..  But it is all still all talk, and when this private navy actually gets some investors, and we see video of them doing their thing, then I will truly be impressed. –Matt

 

Somalia Piracy Spurs Private Navy to Start Within Five Months
November 07, 2011
By Michelle Wiese Bockmann
The company behind the world’s first private navy to protect merchant ships against Somali pirates plans to start armed escorts through the Gulf of Aden within five months after attacks rose to a record this year.
Convoy Escort Programme Ltd., backed by the marine insurance industry, will initially deploy seven former naval patrol boats, each with armed security teams of eight people on board, Angus Campbell, chief executive officer, said by phone from Swarland, England today. The bullet-proofed boats will charge about $30,000 per ship traveling in a convoy of around four vessels over three to four days, he said.
“We are going to be a deterrent,” Campbell said. “We are not in the business of looking for trouble but if anybody tries to attack a vessel we are escorting, our security teams will deploy force if they have to act in self defence.”
Attacks reached a record this year and cost the global economy an estimated $7 billion to $12 billion annually, according to the United Nations’ International Maritime Organization. About 23,000 vessels carrying $1 trillion of trade pass through the Gulf of Aden every year, the U.K. government estimates.

(more…)

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Maritime Security: Italy To Use Military To Guard Merchant Ships Against Pirates

Filed under: Italy,Maritime Security — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 8:15 AM

Interesting news, and this is coming right after a report of another Italian vessel being taken. The reason why it was taken is because their guard force on the boat was not armed. Funny how some folks still think that a less than lethal, unarmed guard force is still a good idea?  On the bright side, it sounds like the MV Montecristo was retaken by British and US commandos and all of the hostages have been released.

As far as using military assets on merchant vessels, I guess that will work. Although I certainly hope that these shipping companies are paying the bill for such a thing, because that is a pretty sweet deal to get a military protection force on their boats for free.  Maybe Italian banks or jewelry stores should write their lawmakers and ask if they will provide military details to protect their businesses?

The Italian navy will have to re-adjust as well to service all of these private vessels. And what is interesting with that is aren’t these vessels losing their merchant status by posting military folks on them?  Aren’t they now technically military vessels?  For example, if these vessels were attacked by an enemy of Italy, that the vessel would be considered a military target and not a civilian target. And who would be in charge on these vessels, the ship’s captain or the military force? I don’t know, and these are some interesting legal questions that I do not have an answer for. –Matt

 

Italy to use military to guard merchant ships against pirates
October 11, 2011
By Barry Moody
Italy is to station military forces on its merchant vessels to guard against attacks by Somali pirates, shipping sources said on Tuesday, the day after another of its ships was attacked off the anarchic east African country.
Many ships already carry private security contractors to try to prevent hijacks, but deployment of military forces on merchant vessels would mark a clear escalation in measures to combat piracy, which costs the world economy billions of dollars each year.
The sources said Defence Minister Ignazio La Russa would sign an agreement later on Tuesday with the confederation of Italian ship owners to put military guards on board vessels in the huge area of the Indian Ocean at risk from Somali pirates, who have hijacked several Italian ships.
The Montecristo, an Italian cargo ship, was attacked by five men in a small boat off the coast of Somalia on Monday, its owner the D’Alesio Group said. A pirate told Reuters by phone that it was under their control. The ship had 23 crew from Italy, India and Ukraine.

(more…)

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Funny Stuff: Another Reason For Armed Security, ‘Pirate Tactic #52–Cooking Beans’

I call this pirate tactic (#52), ‘cooking beans’. lol Quite simply, if the crew and captain of the ship goes running into the citadel, the pirates just board the ship and set it on fire. The fire then cooks ‘the beans’ in the citadel, much like how you would cook a can of beans on an open fire (likewise, if the can is not open, those beans could blow up-lol) This tactic is great if a ship doesn’t have armed security and a pirate force is able to take control of the ship.

On a serious note, when a shipping company is so cheap as to not invest in armed security, and instead depends upon someone else to protect them or save them when their ship is set on fire by pirates, then I don’t have much sympathy for them. The lesson here is that running to the citadel or safe room of a ship, basically relinquishes control of that ship to an attacking force. And once on the ship, they can do whatever on your ship in order to get what they want. Pay the money and get armed security on your boat. –Matt

 

M/V Pacific Express on fire. Photo courtesy of NATO.

 

Pirates Set Fire to Cargo Ship After Failed Hijacking
September 22, 2011
The International Maritime Bureau (IMB) reported that pirates have set the Estelle Shipping-owned cargo ship, M/V Pacific Express, ablaze after they were unable to take control of the vessel.
The IMB reports indicate that the armed pirates were aboard two skiffs about 300 nautical miles east of Mombasa, Kenya, and attempted to seize the vessel.  The Cyprus Maritime-managed Pacific Express crewmembers were all able to retreat to the onboard citadel and dispatched for assistance.
In response to the refuge of the crew, the pirates then set fire to the ship in hopes it would thwart the crew from the citadel.  The piracy flagship of NATO, Andrea Doria, was sent to answer the request. According to the Italian Navy, the pirates fled the scene when they noticed the Andrea Doria approaching.
NATO security teams then evacuated the 26 crew members who were in the citadel, including a Ukrainian ship master, and 25 Filipinos.  The men boarded the Andrea Doria and will be transported to Mombasa.
The M/V Pacific Express had been en route to Mombasa to drop off shipments of steel bars and coils before the attack.  There are no reports on the fate of the Cyprus-flagged vessel as of yet.
Story here.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Maritime Security: Marine Insurers Backing Armed Guards As Piracy Threat Grows

Frédéric Gallois, the deputy general manager at Gallice Security, a specialised security firm, said that keeping a team of four armed agents on board a vessel can cost between $4,000 and $8,000 a day.
Paul Tourret, the director of Institute Supérieur d’Économie Maritime, ISEMAR, a research institute that specialises in sea-based economic activities, estimated that the extra costs to a ship due to the risk of piracy can reach up to $50,000 a day.- Link to quote here.

That is an interesting quote up top, and I am always on the look out for cost estimates on transits. ISEMAR specializes in sea-based economics, so I tend to perk up when think tanks like this put out figures. Although on their website, I was not able to find any documents about armed security costs.  Perhaps some of my french readers could help me out here?

But the real story here is the one below.  That insurers are now getting behind the idea that armed guards on boats is a heck of good idea, compared to their other options. Or compared to the future of West’s navies.

They mentioned below about the defense cuts of Western navies, and the reduction of force size over the coming years. This is a very important point to bring up when it comes to today’s anti-piracy efforts. Eventually today’s war planners and strategists will come to the realization that using large Destroyers to take out tiny little pirate boats is not exactly cost effective. Especially when those navies still continue to falter when it comes to protecting commerce.

Cook said private firms would play an increasing role as navies face spending reviews, citing prospects of a 30 percent decline in the size of Western navies in the next 20 years. “They’re taking the policemen off the block,” he said.

The other statistic that was interesting was this one from ISEMAR. I would have thought that number would have been bigger? Especially if Peter Cook of SAMI said he has 58 member companies? I would be curious if SAMI or any other maritime groups agree with this number?

French maritime economics institute ISEMAR said there were about 1,000 private guards being employed by ships to counter Somali pirates.

Finally, with all of the increased use of armed security, the reduction in naval forces, and increase in pirate attacks and complexity, I have to think that the legal authority for how armed security is used will change. I have argued in the past that defense industries do not profit from the end of their venture. That they profit if the client they protect, continues to be attacked and threatened. But with offense industry, a different market force is set up to where companies profit from the ‘destruction of an enemy’ that threatens a client. That an offense industry work’s itself out of a job.

When countries really think about it, and try to understand what the economics are with how the pirates operate, and how private force ‘could’ operate to counter it, perhaps there might be some pragmatic choices made on the legal front? The question is, how do you reduce the numbers of pirates and attacks, and how can private industry be used to accomplish such a thing?

Specifically, I suggest to bring back the Letter of Marque and Reprisal, and create an offense industry to ‘expulsis piratis, restituta commercia’. It is the legal ‘sledge hammer’ in the tool box of states, and it is just sitting there getting rusty.  As piracy becomes better funded, more violent, more organized, and more rampant, eventually states will have to re-evaluate what is ‘inherently practical’; and change their view on what is ‘inherently governmental’ in order to stop this. –Matt

Marine Insurers Backing Armed Guards as Piracy Threat Grows
By Gus Trompiz
September 20, 2011
More ship insurers are backing the use of private armed guards on merchant vessels at sea to combat Somali piracy as attacks and the resulting costs are set to rise in coming weeks, industry officials said on Tuesday.
Pirate attacks on oil tankers and other ships are costing the world economy billions of dollars a year and navies have struggled to combat the menace, especially in the vast Indian Ocean. Seaborne gangs are set to ramp up attacks in the area after the monsoon season ends.
A famine crisis in Somalia could also draw more people into piracy, marine insurers said.
“Piracy is clogging the arteries of globalization,” said Emma Russell with underwriter Watkins, a member of the Lloyd’s of London insurance market. “No vessel with armed guards has yet been taken,” she added.
Industry delegates at the annual conference of the International Union of Maritime Insurance (IUMI) said there were more than 20,000 transits a year in the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean.
Speakers at the conference said the hiring of private armed guards to accompany ships is increasingly seen as an effective deterrent against pirates and as a complement to overstretched navies, many of whom face budget cuts.
Ship owners and insurers have until recently been reluctant to accept the use of armed private contractors. They have hesitated partly due to legal liabilities and risks, including the problem of bringing weapons into some territorial waters and due to the fear of escalating violence.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress