Feral Jundi

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Industry Talk: Afghanistan-Pay Peanuts, You Get Monkeys

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 2:08 PM

   A couple of things to note with this article.  You pay peanuts, you get monkeys.  If companies want to do business in Afghanistan, then they are going to have to invest in security.  Obviously this ‘guard’ was not thoroughly vetted or that the security company tasked with watching their employees did not keep up with a ‘constant’ vetting process.  

    But vetting costs money, and if business does not want to pay for that expenditure in a contract, then they will get substandard guard service.

    The other thing I wanted to mention, is that the salaries need to go up in Afghanistan.  If we are to follow the Iraq model, then we can deduct that the Taliban are going to continue their attacks in the cities.  That they will continue to attack businesses, create chaos, and try to scare any foreign interests away.  This tactic will hurt the government and hurt the war effort, and hurt the local populations. And if the people lose faith in the Government’s ability to protect them, then that only helps the Taliban cause.  

    Yet again, the market dictates.  If big business is scared off because of this stuff, then they are scared off.  But if the upcoming US administration and the current Afghani administration wants to keep business there, then they are going to have to get busy in either protecting them or giving some kind of incentive to keep them there.  

    And if you are a company representative that is doing research about security in Afghanistan, all I will have to say is pay up if you want to play.  Just like the shipping industry is starting to see the light about security in the Gulf of Aden, you too will have to make security adjustments to be able to operate in Afghanistan.  That’s if you think that buck is worth the effort there.  

    But if you do want to stay, one adjustment that you can do is guard your high level company leaders with substantial security.  That is a no brainer to me.  Pay the money, and get yourself a protective detail that knows their stuff.  Or continue to think that no one wants to kill you? 

     Now I will not suggest low profile or high profile security, because that is up to the guy on the ground that is assigned to protect you.  All I will suggest is to pay the money to get a professional group that has your best interest and life in mind when they make decisions, and they have the experience to back up those decisions.    

    The other adjustment is that if you are going to hire local nationals to do your security, then you should have a security expert review that contract.  Pay the money for a guy that comes highly recommended and is trustworthy, to act as quality control for the security services provided and to help write up a good contract in the first place.  Pay a good salary, and keep him around for awhile.  You cannot just hire a local company, and expect quality service–you need a third party to watch them.  You actually have to pay attention and watch that service like a hawk, and ensure that you are getting a quality product.  But yet again, that costs money.

    Hopefully we will see the adjustments needed, to give those that are over there doing business, the best chance of survival.  You see this played out time and time again.  Security is something you should not be going cheap on, if you care about your employees and want to do business in a war zone. –Head Jundi  

——————————————————————-

Killings increase Westerners’ fears in Afghan capital

October 26, 2008

 

KABUL (AFP) — The gunning down of three Westerners in the Afghan capital in less than a week is a sharp reminder that Kabul is no longer a safe haven in a country gripped by violence, expatriates say.

Saturday’s shooting of a Briton and a South African, along with an Afghan, outside the offices of the international shipping company DHL appears to have been the result of a dispute unrelated to a growing Taliban insurgency.

Nevertheless, it feeds a sense of insecurity with international residents already concerned by Monday’s killing of a British-South African aid worker and a series of attacks against expatriates this year.

“It is the unpredictability of security incidents which is making it difficult,” said Anu John, who has been in Kabul for 15 months employed by an international non-government organisation.

“The security seems to have deteriorated significantly in the last three to four months… the changes are pretty visible,” she said.

(more…)

Sunday, October 19, 2008

News: Private Security a Necessity in Kandahar Province

     Little is talked about the sacrifices that local national private security forces have made.  These would be classified as local security folk who often help out local businesses operate in these war environments.  I witnessed the same thing in Iraq.  They are paid less, and their equipment and resources are minimal.  But by local standards, it’s not a bad gig.  300 Dollars a month is probable more than what most locals make per month, and guys line up for these jobs because there is nothing else out there.  But you also get what you pay for.  

   The Taliban know that these convoys are easy pickings as well, hence the reason why the continue to attack them.  The one thing I picked up on in this article was the idea that ISAF forces, were not coming to the aid of these companies.  It’s nice to know that the Canadians have been helping these guys out when they can.  But really, ISAF needs to make it more of a priority to help out these guys.  It goes back to winning hearts and minds.  These guys are contract security, but they are also the local population.  If we make it a point to help them out when they need some assistance, then maybe–just maybe, they might be a little bit more inclined to continue working for the good guys, as opposed to flipping sides.  Or worse yet, selling their issued guns and ammo to the other side.(I saw this practice in action in Iraq, and you can blame low pay, mixed loyalties, and poor leadership on that one)

     Either way, these men are brothers in arms, and the deserve our respect.  An army cannot fight without the supplies provided by these convoys, and these men are very crucial to that process.  Even if these guys are not directly protecting Coalition assets, they are still a group that should be recognized as important.  We should also be reaching out to these guys and coordinating a little more so accidents do not happen in the future.  Or better yet, winning over some of these guys with guns, so they don’t run over to the Taliban.  –Head Jundi

    

Private security guards oversee the departure of a 250-truck NATO supply convoy from Kandahar to Kabul this week. Only some of the security guards wear uniforms and flak vests and none have helmets.

Photograph by : Tom Blackwell/National Post

 

Private security a necessity in Kandahar province 

Tom Blackwell

Canwest News Service

Saturday, October 18, 2008

 

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan – As he girded himself for another shift protecting a massive NATO supply convoy this week, Rozi Mohammed made a frank admission: the work terrifies him.

(more…)

Monday, September 15, 2008

Technology: Taliban Using Skype Phones to Dodge Intelligence Agencies

Filed under: Afghanistan,Technology — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:12 AM

    I want to thank one of my readers for sending me this story, and this kind of thing is just one more reality about the various technologies out there and how they are being used in the war.  That the enemy is a learning organization, and they have figured out that Skype is a secure enough communications apparatus to use.  

   But my thoughts on this is that quite possibly the intel agencies out there already know how to crack the encryption of VOIP calls, or their Data Mining capabilities are already monitoring the Skype stuff, and that this story was just designed to give the impression that Skype is impenetrable.  

     One thing is for sure, stories like this make it very clear to the enemy that their method of communications is receiving intense focus. –Head Jundi  

—————————————————————— 

Skype 

Taliban using Skype phones to dodge MI6

 

By Glen Owen

Last updated at 11:10 PM  

13th September 2008

Taliban fighters targeting British troops in Afghanistan are using the latest ‘internet phones’ to evade detection by MI6, security sources said last night. 

Skype, a popular piece of consumer software that allows free calls to be made over the web, has been adopted by insurgents to communicate with cells strung out across the country. 

(more…)

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress