Feral Jundi

Friday, February 12, 2010

Government Work: TSA To Give 10,000 Workers Clearances

   Well, there you have it guys and gals.  If you wanted to get a clearance, you can now get one through the mighty TSA. lol Interesting move, and I am wondering what this will buy them?  I mean did they not get briefed on threats before this latest move, or is this just a push to try and weed out some bad seeds? If it is, then TSA will soon find out that they will lose many employees.  Which is good, but what is also equally important is the leadership out in the field and giving your employees good training and guidance. I would also focus on customer service and satisfaction, and it seems government just does a terrible job in this department. Clearances will not make up for poor performance or worse yet, loose lips.  Because now this will be 10,000 individuals who have to be depended upon to watch what they say and do, all because they now have access to sensitive information. –Matt

——————————————————————

Sir, is this your foot?

TSA to Clear 10,000 Workers for Access to Classified Intelligence

February 12, 2010

The Transportation Security Administration plans to clear 10,000 workers for access to secret intelligence, Fox News has learned.

The move comes as a slew of security agencies try to improve intelligence-sharing in the wake of the attempted Christmas Day bombing. However, a TSA spokesman told Fox News that the plan to give thousands of workers security clearance was developed in July 2008, and that the background checks started one year ago.

(more…)

Friday, January 15, 2010

Montana: Private Security Considered After TSA Failures At Bozeman Airport, And Other City Airports

Filed under: Industry Talk,Montana — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 10:00 AM

    “Again, it’s because you can fire a bad contractor, but you can’t fire the government. I think TSA stands for Thousands Standing Around.” -John Stossel 

*****

   First off, bravo to Dick Roehm for at least taking a realistic approach to security at his airport.  If they cannot depend upon the TSA to provide good security, along with good customer service and satisfaction, then I say go private and demand those things via a well written contract.  Europe, along with Israel, has been doing this awhile, and to me, the TSA along with government is a terrible security apparatus to use.

   As for Jim McGarvey, stop drinking the kool aid that the contractor haters have been serving you, and listen to reason.  Better yet, just read the quote up top, and tell me how with the current system in place, that you can actually fire the TSA for doing a poor job? Besides, the argument that the town will lose jobs when they go private is stupid.  Who do you think private companies will hire for work locally?

   The other thing that bothers me about Jim’s assessment is the idea that making a profit is evil or something?  Profit is what drives a company and it’s employees to be competitive and do a good job in order to maintain the contract.  If they suck at what they are doing, or try to rip off the airport, the airport authority just ends the contract and goes with someone that can do a better job.  And hey, if the AA writes up a good contract and actually monitors the quality of the contract, then they can actually get a good value for the dollar.  The company providing the service also knows what it has to do in order to maintain the contract when you have that kind of a system.  Like Stossel said, you can fire a bad contractor, but you can’t fire the government. –Matt

——————————————————————–

Security breach raises questions about government airport screening

January 13, 2010

By DANIEL PERSON Chronicle Staff Writer

A passenger getting through security at Gallatin Field with a gun, coupled with ongoing complaints about how passengers are treated at checkpoints, is trying the patience of the head of the local airport authority.

Now, Dick Roehm is raising the prospect turning to a private company to handle security at the airport.

On the morning of Sunday, Dec. 13, Transportation Security Administration screeners at Gallatin Field inadvertently allowed a man with a firearm in his carry-on bag through security, according to a TSA statement released Wednesday.

While in the boarding area, the unidentified man realized he had the gun and turned himself into TSA officials. In response, TSA rescreened every passenger at the airport, including passengers on a Horizon Air flight that had left the gate but not yet taken off, delaying three flights for more than an hour, said Roehm, who was briefed on the incident.

The gun was turned over to local law enforcement and the passenger was allowed to continue on the flight, TSA spokesman Dwayne Baird said in a written statement.

(more…)

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Industry Talk: Privatizing Airport Security

“Again, it’s because you can fire a bad contractor, but you can’t fire the government. I think TSA stands for Thousands Standing Around.” -John Stossel

*****

   This is a no brainer coming from our side of the house, and I salute John Stossel for calling it the way he sees it. I brought up three interesting informational pieces on airport security, and the reasoning behind going the private route.  For one, it works, and number two, it is what the Israelis do.

   I know, I know, we have a much larger airport system in America than the Israelis do.  But we must look hard at what we are doing, versus what others are doing, and ‘build a snowmobile’ out of the thing.  Privatizing airport security is just one component of the strategy, and using what we can from the Israeli and European models is essential. By the way, I love the quote that Stossel put together up top. lol-Matt

—————————————————————–

O’Reilly Tonight: Privatize the TSA

By John Stossel

January 5, 2010

I’ll go on O’Reilly tonight to talk about the ridiculous new flight rules from the TSA .

Before my last flight, right after Christmas, security officials patted me down. I was wearing shorts. But they patted down my bare legs. There is a lot of “security” that seems pointless. Jet Blue told us that TSA had ordered them to keep all TV’s off for the whole flight. Everyone had to stay seated for an hour before takeoff — without blankets, pillows or personal belongings on their laps. And so on—you’ve heard about the new rules.

Those rules might help stop a terrorist if he did the exact same thing that Abdulmutallab attempted on Christmas. In reality, I suspect the rules will do nothing but inconvenience millions.

TSA should not exist. Before 9/11, screening was private — private companies, working for government, did the screening. They weren’t very sophisticated, but they did the job. The small knives the hijackers used were not violations of government rules. Neither were unlocked cockpit doors.

(more…)

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress