Feral Jundi

Monday, March 1, 2010

Paracargo: Army Testing New Airdrop System For Afghanistan

     Boy, I don’t know about this one.  Dropping paracargo without a chute, is the holy grail I guess, but in practice, there are a ton of issues.  If an aircraft has to drop low and slow, then now they are a prime target for an enterprising enemy.  How many aircraft will have to be shot down, before this ‘chute-less’ system becomes a failure is my question?

     The other point I want to make, is that if there is a need for more paracargo operations in Afghanistan, then a quick fix to get more folks over there, is for Dept. of Homeland Security to detail out the smokejumper units during the off season.  You have pilots, spotters (kickers), and tons of smokejumpers who all specialize in paracargo operations, who have nothing to do during the winters.  They could be called upon for disaster relief or the war effort, and they are all federal assets.  Or if companies wanted to tap into that resource, they could easily spread the word throughout the various lofts of smokejumper bases, and say they are looking for folks who specialize in small bundle paracargo operations.

     I think it is also pretty funny that the Army or whomever came up with this LCLA concept, and thinks that it is new or revolutionary. I have news for you folks, Low Cost Low Altitude paracargo operations is nothing new and the military, NGO’s, and smokejumpers have been performing such operations for a long time.

     At least with the smokejumpers, we actually make a point of retrieving, repairing, and reusing those cheap parachutes that the military is currently just throwing away.  But I guess if you guys are going to throw away paracargo chutes, then at least make the cheapest chutes possible.  In my experience, just a square piece of canopy with four lines made out of tubular webbing attached to it, worked pretty good.  Or you can take all of those old parachutes that the Army and Marines threw out, and convert them into usable paracargo chutes.  I know there are warehouses filled with that stuff, and it wouldn’t take much to get the machine of industry to modify all of that stuff for the war effort.  That is the kind of Low Cost paracargo operations that I am talking about. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Army Testing New Airdrop System for Afghanistan

By USArmy

February 25, 2010

WASHINGTON: The supply requirement in Afghanistan will dramatically increase this year according to the Army’s top logistician, and he said the Army is testing a new airdrop system to help meet the demand.

Speaking at an Association of the U.S. Army Land Warfare Institute breakfast series Feb. 19, Lt. Gen. Mitchell H. Stevenson, Army G-4, told the attendees that he hopes the new delivery system will be ready for deployment to Afghanistan by the end of summer.

The Army Freedrop Packaging Concept Project is currently developing and testing a new airdrop system called the Freedrop Delivery System forAfghanistan.

The new system will allow bundles of supplies such as ammunition, small generators and other Class IX repair parts, Meals Ready to Eat, and bottled water of up to 150 pounds to be freedropped (no parachutes) at about 70 knots airspeed from under 75 feet above ground level at the current 19Afghanistan outposts which can only receive supplies by air.

“The idea here was to develop a package that you just kick out the side of a helicopter or airplane when you’re flying very low… 50 feet above ground,” Stevenson said. “You eliminate the problem of packing, rigging the chute and of course doing any kind of recovery operation.”

The freedrop system is currently being developed and tested by the Army G-4’s Logistics Innovation Agency and involves a number of key stakeholders, to include operational partners in the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, N.C.

The Army already uses four airdrop systems in Afghanistan. Getting supplies to Soldiers there is tough because the country has no seaport and relies on two main land routes so “airdrop has become big business” said the Army’s chief logistician.

(more…)

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Film: Cameron Says Avatar Not A Slam On Corps? Oh Really?

Filed under: Film,Military News — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 3:51 AM

   Why is it that most of the characters in the movie, to include the main character, are former Marines?  You have laced the fabric of your movie with everything Marine, and then you put a PMC bow on top of it and say ‘oh, we aren’t slamming the Marines’. Oh really?

   Not to mention that he tries to make out the main character of the film, as the hero, because he turned on his fellow Marines or ‘mercenaries’ (whatever is convenient for Cameron) during the process.  We have a term for that in the real world, and that is called traitor.

   By the way, am I immoral because I am a former Marine, and I also protect people and things in war zones as a civilian security contractor? Do I get to be the hero in Cameron’s eyes, if I switch sides in this war and kill whomever I am guarding or working with? With this twisted movie plot logic, that would make Maj. Hasan of the Ft. Hood incident a hero. I love how Hollywood works.  When are we going to see some good movies that celebrate the military and their service in this war, as opposed to this crap?

   Finally, if Cameron was really interested in appeasing the Marines for his 3D traitor movie, he would donate a ton of money to some Marine wounded warriors.  Thats if they would even take the money. –Matt

——————————————————————

Cameron: ‘Avatar’ not slam on Corps

By James K. Sanborn

Saturday Jan 23, 2010

James Cameron’s “Avatar” has been met with enthusiasm by audiences across the globe. But despite commercial success, the film has been the target of some who see it as an affront to the Marine Corps.

Cameron tells Marine Corps Times that “Avatar” was meant in part to pay homage to the Corps.

“The highly sympathetic main character of the film … is a former Marine,” Cameron said in an e-mail. “His courage in the face of overwhelming odds makes him a hero of mythic proportions by the end of the story.”

(more…)

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Iraq: Iraq Confiscates Arms In Private Security Crackdown

   I am not sure what companies they did this too, and if readers have any further info, feel free to fill in the blanks.  I certainly hope that those that are no longer armed, are able to leave safely or get on a base to get some kind of protection. –Matt

——————————————————————

Iraq confiscates arms in private security crackdown

09 Jan 2010

By Khalid al-Ansary

BAGHDAD, Jan 9 (Reuters) – Security forces confiscated hundreds of rifles, thousands of rounds of ammunition and other military gear in a crackdown on private security contractors in Iraq, officials said on Saturday.

Police raided three locations in Baghdad on Friday, a week after Iraqi authorities were incensed by a U.S. judge’s decision to throw out charges against five Blackwater Worldwide security guards accused of killing over a dozen Iraqi civilians in 2007.

Officials said they are targeting private security companies that are no longer legally licensed to operate in Iraq.

“All those companies with their work permits expired are not allowed to move one metre inside Baghdad, or own one piece of weaponry,” Baghdad security spokesman Qassim al-Moussawi said.

He would not reveal how many unlicensed contractors were on the target list, or their names.

Authorities raided the headquarters of a foreign security contractor, whose name could not be immediately confirmed, on Friday night and confiscated 20,000 rounds of ammunition and more than 300 armoured shields.

In another location they found 400 rifles, helmets, radio devices and more than 35 vehicles believed to belong to the same company, officials said. No one was arrested.

(more…)

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

History: Using Lotteries To Fund Wars In Early America

   Now you don’t hear this little tidbit of history very much, now do we?  So not only did the Virginia Company have a lottery to fund the venture to the ‘new world’, that money was also used to contract the services of privateers to transport those colonists, or pay the salaries of contract soldiers to protect those colonists.  The lottery concept seemed to be an attractive method of financing this stuff back then, as we can see by the lotto ticket for the Revolutionary War below.

   So let’s take this a step further.  Could a modern day lottery be used by countries to fund their wars?  How about an Afghan War Lotto.  We could call it Super Pashtun Daily Doubles. lol And if you look at the lotteries going on in the various U.S. States and countries, you can see that the potential for raising some serious cash is there. Tack on the advent of the internet, and wow.

   Better yet, in countries that are just starting out or are just scrambling to gain stability and peace, imagine a world wide lottery system for them, with the expressed interest of raising an army or funding equipment and infrastructure for their country?

   The lottery, like privateering, should be looked at again with a modern day lens for warfare.  Especially if the world wide economies continue to have problems, or the dollar decreases in value, or whatever financial calamity that could severely limit war funding. Just because the economy sucks, doesn’t mean Al Qaeda or Somali Pirates take vacations.

   Which takes me to my next point.  The enemies we are fighting these days, are already using extremely innovative means to finance their wars and maintain their good deals.  From piracy, to drugs, to kidnapping, or whatever criminal venture.  The Somalis have figured out an excellent business model through modern day piracy, and even put together a stock exchange for it.  Drug cartels make millions of dollars in their industry, and so much so that they finance entire armies to protect their business. Groups like Al Qaeda and the Taliban use all these methods to get money, and they also throw in extortion or protection rackets, along with seeking donations from buddies all over the world.

   Meanwhile, large nation states, like the U.S., are not making any money off of their wars against these folks , and the use of such large conventional forces with all of their modern fancy equipment and tanks and boats etc. etc., costs a ton of money. What happens when there isn’t any more money to continue the fight against this financially resilient enemy?  In simpler terms, the enemies we are fighting really don’t have a money problem, but large countries with ultra expensive war machines certainly can have money problems, and do.  I guess that is why I keep bringing up these cheaper means of warfare, or in other words, innovative ways to introduce private industry to the war in order to make it more cost effective.  With that said, I will continue to look for the good stuff out there. –Matt

—————————————————————–

 

1776 Lottery ticket issued by the Continental Congress to finance the Revolutionary War. 

Early America Lotteries, 1612-1900 (Wikipedia)

An English lottery, authorized by King James I in 1612, granted the Virginia Company of London the right to raise money to help establish settlers in the first permanent English colony at Jamestown, Virginia.

Lotteries in colonial America played a significant part in the financing of both private and public ventures. It has been recorded that more than 200 lotteries were sanctioned between 1744 and 1776, and played a major role in financing roads, libraries, churches, colleges, canals, bridges, etc. In the 1740s, the foundation of Princeton and Columbia Universities was financed by lotteries, as was the University of Pennsylvania by the Academy Lottery in 1755.

During the French and Indian Wars, several colonies used lotteries to help finance fortifications and their local militia. In May 1758, the State of Massachusetts raised money with a lottery for the “Expedition against Canada.”

Benjamin Franklin organized a lottery to raise money to purchase cannon for the defense of Philadelphia. Several of these lotteries offered prizes in the form of “Pieces of Eight.” George Washington’s Mountain Road Lottery in 1768 was unsuccessful. However, these rare lottery tickets bearing George Washington’s signature have become collectors’ items which sold for about $15,000 in 2007. Later, in 1769, Washington was a manager for Col. Bernard Moore’s “Slave Lottery”, which advertised land and slaves as prizes in the Virginia Gazette.

(more…)

Monday, December 21, 2009

Media News: So Why Aren’t Contractors Represented At American Forces Network?

AFN

   The other day I was thinking, why aren’t contractors represented at American Forces Network?  There are thousands of us overseas, and we have been a part of the war effort for years now.  So where is the acknowledgement of our existence at AFN?

   I say this, because every contractor that has ever been to Iraq or Afghanistan, has been exposed to AFN.  We watch all the DoD commercials about safety or suicide prevention or wearing reflector belts on bases, yet there is nothing about contractors.  I think the only commercial I have ever seen dealing with contractors, is a hotline that troops can call if they see contractors ripping off the government.  I wonder if there are any commercials that give information on how to turn in troops who are ripping off the DoD?  Or are contractors the only ones that can do harm?

   Furthermore, you watch all these shows like the Pentagon Channel or the Marines or Army Show, and it is great to see news about what they are doing in the war, but what about the thousands of contractors performing important and essential missions as well?  How about the guys training Afghan Army or Border Patrol folks? Isn’t that a crucial element to the strategy in Afghanistan, yet the contractor side of this is completely ignored?

     How about the munitions clearance programs, or the interpreters, or the dining facility folks?  Where’s the Christmas messages from the various company management out there? Or the thanks from Generals or Congressmen for the work we have done?  I mean you guys contracted our services, are you not thankful for that service?

   I guess my point is, is that we continue to be treated as if we do not exist, or that we really don’t matter in this war.  The reality is that we do matter and we do have a great impact on this war.  And for the DoD to not at least use AFN to communicate with their contractor force, is just stupid.

   They could be developing public service messages that communicate directly to contractors.  The DoD can also target contractors with their resiliency messages, to prevent any future Fitzsimmons type incidents.  There is so much that needs to be said and communicated to my group, yet there is silence. If in fact the DoD wants to make contracting work in this war, they need to connect with us.  To not take advantage of this media tool to create a unity of effort in this war, is yet again, a strategic mistake.

   The irony of it all, is that AFN uses civilians and contractors in the production of their shows. But shhhhh, don’t tell anyone. lol –Matt

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress