Feral Jundi

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Technology: New Widget–CNAS in the News

Filed under: Technology — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 10:48 AM

   There are couple of reasons why I have set up this new widget.  First, CNAS is filled with some very influential strategists and COIN experts (the CEO is Dr. Nagl).  Second, the ideas and concepts developed at this think tank, are what will impact the decision makers for the war, and thus impact the contracting industry. So it pays to follow the conversation. 

   This is also just a news deal.  So any mention of CNAS in the news, will pop up in this feed.  I think that would be the best indicator of any thought provoking ideas, because everyone is paying attention to them.

   For politics, like I said, I am apolitical on this blog.  Please do not take offense if you are not down with CNAS for whatever reason politically.  I am simply trying to monitor the top thought processes out there about the war. There are numerous think tanks I could put up, but this one seems to be the most influential to the administration. I could be wrong, and if the readers have suggestions or corrections, I am completely open.

     As for the ads, that is the latest deal with widgetbox, and if it becomes too annoying, I will just take it down and find another widget maker.  That is part of the reason why I put it down on the bottom.

   Finally, for the technical stuff, if you want to scroll through the stories on the widget, there is a bar just to the right of the various posts.  Left click and hold over that bar, drag it down or up to control.  Or just put your cursor over the topics and use your computer’s scroll feature. When you want to check out a story, just put your cursor over the title and click on it.  It is that simple and enjoy. –Matt

Military News: The Current State of USSOCOM, by Admiral Eric Olson

     In testimony the other day before the House Armed Services Committee, Adm. Eric Olson, the head of U.S. Special Operations Command had a lot of interesting things to say about the current state of USSOCOM.  I thought this particular section was the most eye catching.  Is anyone else thinking what I am thinking? lol –Matt

—————————————————————— 

ADMIRAL ERIC T. OLSON 

COMMANDER 

UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND 

Introduction and History 

 Mr. Chairman and distinguished Members of the Committee, thank you for this opportunity to report on the state of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM)…….  

Service Enabling Capabilities 

    Demand for special operations forces is on the increase; yet, by their very nature, Special Operations Forces are limited in size and scope. I am already on record as stating that SOF cannot grow more than three-to-five percent per year in those key units and capabilities that must be developed within our own organizational structures and training pipelines. This growth rate will not meet the already obvious appetite for the effects of SOF in forward operating areas. 

(more…)

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Industry Talk: Contractor Census- More Security Contractors, Less Overall Contractors in the USCENTCOM AOR

   There is a lot of juice in this report(s), and I recommend reading through it to get a feel for where things stand right now.  The stuff that jumped out at me, is the increase in security contractors in both Iraq(23%) and Afghanistan(29%) from the last quarter census.  You would think with all the negative press out there, that the US would be cutting down on the use of armed contractors.  It looks to me like someone at least appreciates what we do, enough so to contract even more of us.  

   To me this is significant.  With Iraq, troop withdrawals will be creating security vacuums in some areas, and security contractors will be filling those gaps. And with the RUF being that we are only limited to defensive operations, you will see us taking over many defensive operations in Iraq and more Coalition troops being freed up for offensive operations.  The numbers don’t lie.

   With Afghanistan, this makes sense as well.  With an increase of troops, there will be an increase in support in the form of contractors.  But someone has to protect those contractors while they build stuff, and those security contractors will be used to defend FOBs to free up the troops so they can go on the offense.

   I highly recommend checking out the report, because it showed the graphs that went along with the report, as well as the break down in contractor types.  It is broken down under US Citizens, Third Country Nationals, and Local Nationals.  In Iraq, Third Country Nationals outnumbered everyone- lots of Ugandan security contractors is one example.  In Afghanistan, it is the Local Nationals that outnumber everyone, and there is no surprise there.   

   The trend line is there and security contractors are stepping up to fill these defensive security needs in the war. My hope is that the reforms needed to manage and account for these contractors is able to catch up.  And this report below showed some promising new developments in that area as well.  It sounds like the SPOT database is starting to work it’s magic, and I am glad they were able to get a better handle on the accountability area.  The decrease in overall contractor numbers from last quarter was somewhat contributed to this new database tracking system.  There is a description of the SPOT in the link I provided below, and I recommend reading that report as well.    

   In other areas, we will see how the SOFA and UCMJ issues turn out, because that is an area that definitely needs leadership and enforcement.  I still think that we need to be moving faster on the issue of contractor management and accountability, and for it to take this long to get just this far is disheartening.  We have a war to fight and this is all stuff that should have been hashed out years ago. –Matt

—————————————————————— 

CONTRACTOR SUPPORT OF U.S. OPERATIONS

IN USCENTCOM AOR, IRAQ, AND AFGHANISTAN

BACKGROUND:  This update reports DoD contractor personnel numbers in theater and outlines DoD efforts to improve management of contractors accompanying U.S. forces.  It covers DoD contractor personnel deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) area of responsibility (AOR) as of March 31, 2009.

KEY POINTS:

Ending 2nd quarter FY 2009, USCENTCOM reported approximately 242,657 contractor personnel working for the DoD in the USCENTCOM AOR.     

(more…)

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Technology: The First InterComm™ Solution–A Communications System to Unite Contractors and Military?

   Ok guys and gals, this is a good one.  I have always been frustrated with the lack of communications capability between all the companies and the military, while operating out there in war zones.  If everyone in the theater of operations had a First InterComm System set up in one of their convoy vehicles or at their FOB, then everyone should be able to communicate with one another, yet still use their current radio systems.  

   Companies could be issued these boxes, or it could be mandated that all convoy operations and sites have them as part of the contract.  That way, the company can still use their current communications systems, but with this device they can communicate with everyone else that has their own communications system, yet has the same device.  That way, companies interacting with other companies or even the military, will be able to communicate.  That is cool.

   For convoys that pass each other on the road, these devices could allow them to communicate with each other.  Especially if one convoy just blasted through an ambush or visually spotted a potential IED, and then they could pass on this information via radio–and instantly, yet not have to mess around with reprogramming or changing radios.  That is much better than going through a third party TOC that is miles away that might or might not get the information, and more than likely will get it too late to make a difference for the here and now.

(more…)

Friday, May 22, 2009

Sri Lanka: How Sri Lanka’s Military Won

Filed under: Sri Lanka — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 9:10 PM

“So many factors have contributed to the success of the Sri Lankan forces. There was a clear aim and mandate from the political level to the official level and to the military level to destroy the LTTE at any cost. There was no ambiguity in that,” Gotabaya Rajapaksa told the BBC. “ The rebels thought the international community, especially neighbouring India, would intervene looking at the civilian suffering ” 

And from Boyd’s Patterns of Conflict:

Break guerillas’ moral-mental-physical hold over the population, destroy their cohesion, and bring about their collapse via political initiative that demonstrates moral legitimacy and vitality of government and by relentless military operations that emphasize stealth/fast-tempo/fluidity-of-action and cohesion of overall effort.*If you cannot realize such a political program, you might consider changing sides! Page 108 

     An interesting little article about a long and brutal little war and it’s conclusion.  The thing I picked up on was the split in leadership within the Tamils and how that helped to bring about their defeat in the Eastern Province. Actually there are all sorts of interesting little happenings that we can learn from in this conflict.  Bravo to the Sri Lankan military. –Matt

—————————————————————— 

How Sri Lanka’s military won

By Anbarasan Ethirajan

BBC News

2009/05/22 

Few believed him when Sri Lanka’s powerful defence secretary said he required three years to defeat the once invincible Tamil Tiger rebels.

When Gotabaya Rajapaksa made the assertion, the Tamil Tigers, or Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam [LTTE], controlled nearly one third of the country, had a well-organised, ruthless fighting unit, sufficient stocks of heavy weapons, a small navy and a rudimentary air force.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress