Feral Jundi

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Publications: Tell Me Why We’re There? Enduring Interests in Afghanistan (and Pakistan) by Fick, Kilcullen, Nagl, Singh

Filed under: Afghanistan,Pakistan,Publications — Tags: , , , , , , , — Matt @ 4:01 PM

   If you care about the direction we are taking in the war, then I highly recommend reading this report.  The authors should give you a clue as to how important this thing is. If President Obama was smart, he would read this report as well, and not have some staffer spoon feed it to him. –Matt

—————————————————————— 

Tell Me Why We’re There? Enduring Interests in Afghanistan (and Pakistan)Publication Type: Policy Brief

Publication Date: 01/22/2009

Author(s): Nathaniel C. Fick, David Kilcullen, John A. Nagl, Vikram J. Singh 

January 2009 – In 2009, the Obama administration will attempt to deliver on campaign promises to change the Afghan war’s trajectory. In April, the Strasbourg NATO summit will determine the alliance’s role in shaping the future of the country and the region. By the fall, Afghans will have voted for their president for only the second time since 2001, an event which may irrevocably set the country’s course. By the end of this summer’s fighting season, the war in Afghanistan will not yet be won, but it could well be lost.

After seven years and the deaths of more than a thousand American and coalition troops, there is still no consensus on whether the future of Afghanistan matters to the United States and Europe, or on what can realistically be achieved there. Afghanistan does matter. A stable Afghanistan is necessary to defeat Al Qaeda and to further stability in South and Central Asia. Understanding the war in Afghanistan, maintaining domestic and international support for it, and prosecuting it well requires three things: a clear articulation of U.S. interests in Afghanistan, a concise definition of what the coalition seeks to achieve there, and a detailed strategy to guide the effort.

U.S. interests in Afghanistan may be summarized as “two no’s”: there must be no sanctuary for terrorists with global reach in Afghanistan, and there must be no broader regional meltdown. Securing these objectives requires helping the Afghans to build a sustainable system of governance that can adequately ensure security for the Afghan people—the “yes” upon which a successful exit strategy depends.

Read the Rest of the Paper Here

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Mexico: CIA and Pentagon Wonder–Could Mexico Implode?

Filed under: Mexico — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 5:51 PM

   Thanks to Doug for sending this.  More bad news out of Mexico, and it is certainly alarming to hear this perspective from our military and intelligence leaders. I guess on the bright side, there will probably be opportunities for training gigs in the near future, and we have talked about that in the past on FJ. With Plan Mexico or the Merida Initiative, you can see what is included.  Training is mentioned twice, and not just for Mexico. –Matt 

The Merida Initiative will provide funding for:

    * Non-intrusive inspection equipment such as ion scanners, gamma ray scanners, X-ray vans and canine units for Mexico and Central America.

    * Technologies to improve and secure telecommunications systems that collect criminal information in Mexico.

    * Technical advice and training to strengthen the institutions of justice, case management software to track investigations through the system, new offices of citizen complaints and professional responsibility, and witness protection programs to Mexico.

    * Eight used Bell 412 EP helicopters and two Cessna 208 Caravan surveillance airplanes to Mexico.

    * Equipment, training and community action programs in Central American countries to implement anti-gang measures and expand the reach of these measures.

——————————————————————-

No money or weapons will be provided to Mexico or Central America.

CIA And Pentagon Wonder: Could Mexico Implode?

by Tom Bowman

February 27, 2009  

Drug-related violence in Mexico is escalating at an alarming rate and threatening the government of President Felipe Calderon.

CIA and U.S. military planners now fear a worst-case scenario — that the country could implode.

The American military is quietly stepping in with more training.

It seems that every night in Mexico there are reports of drug-related violence — murders, kidnappings, armed battles with police, narco-traffickers who outgun even the Mexican army with their rocket-propelled grenades.

“Thousands [have been] murdered this year,” says retired Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey, who served as U.S. drug czar under President Clinton. He visited Mexico recently and painted a desperate picture.

(more…)

Iraq: The End of War, the Joker Effect, and Dangerous Times Ahead.

Filed under: Iraq — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 2:05 PM

“I just did what I do best, I took your little plan and I turned it on itself. I mean look what I did to this city with a few drums of gas and a couple of bullets, hmm.” –The Joker

***** 

The End of War, the Joker Effect, and Dangerous Times Ahead.

     So now we are at that point, where we are seeing the end of the war in Iraq.  I think that is good news, if we are in fact honest about the progress and where we are at with that war.  There have been many excellent milestones achieved in Iraq, and we have come a long way from the bloody years of this conflict.  So much sacrifice, and so much effort, and I truly hope that Iraq is able to handle this next phase of the war.  Because if history tells us anything, the beginning and the end of a war, are usually the most dangerous for all involved.

     As we pull out, and especially if we pullout at a rapid pace, the potential for attacks increase.  I know if I were the insurgency in Iraq, this is the time where I would pick up operations and make things bloody.  The image that I would want the world to see, is one of western failure, and the way you make that happen is through the ‘Joker Effect’ (from the movie Dark Knight).  A couple of guys, with a good plan and some bombs and bullets, can certainly cause chaos in Iraq–even at this stage. Hell, the entire war can be defined by this concept, and this is nothing new.  But at this point of the war, it will be the Iraqis taking more of that responsibility of dealing with this, and the Coalition taking less responsibility, and all with each day of this ratio changing. Once the drawdown machine begins, it is game on.  The insurgency will certainly take advantage of this.

     I point to the tactics of Hamas, as Israel was pulling out of Gaza.  They continued to shoot rockets as the Israelis left, and that very act defeated one of the objectives of the Israelis–to stop the rocket attacks.  The image presented to the world, was that the Israelis failed to stop the rocket attacks, and they just killed a bunch of civilians in the process–so Israel lost on the front as well.  We all know the IDF certainly killed many of Hamas’ leadership and soldiers, and certainly outmatched them.  But the rockets kept flying, despite all the efforts, and that is the point to remember, when talking about the end of a conflict and the perception of order versus chaos.  It is very easy to present a situation of chaos, and the enemy knows this.

     We also have images of Vietnam, with helicopters picking up folks off of rooftops, and total chaos as the communists marched upon the cities. (and on a side note, it was Air America helicopters conducting those operations)  Will something similar happen in Iraq? I doubt it, but this is the perception the insurgency will want to present.  We must understand that the insurgency will do what it can, to make our withdrawal look like a Vietnam/Israeli style withdrawal and that we did not achieve our stated goals.   

     The other factor to remember for our industry, is that we will certainly be called upon, to assist in this drawdown.  This could be an extreme test for everyone involved with security contracting in Iraq.  The logistics trains will need protection, and these things will be attacked.  The roads will be thick with targets of opportunity, and the potential for bottleneck and choke points is great.  Remember, we have supplies coming in, and war equipment leaving–the roads are going to be packed.

     I also think that the looting of bases will be a huge problem as we leave.  Perhaps we should set up an auction for these materials of the base, and the money of the auction will go to the military and police forces of the Iraqis?  That way, the Iraqis will show an interest in controlling the security of those bases, as they are stripped down and cleaned out.  Because if they don’t, you will see what happened when the British left their bases down in the south–looting and chaos.  I have even seen this kind of thing at a small scale, when you leave an outpost, and how the local populations fight over and loot those facilities. The state must have control over that process, because anything else will show a complete lack of respect for the state. Order is essential, chaos is the enemy.

     President Obama has also stated that a reserve force will remain.  That is good, and I certainly hope that if that reserve force needs more troops in the future, just in case the situation on the ground in Iraq starts to get active again, then we will do what is necessary to help. Because if the Iraqis are not keeping up with the fire of insurgency, we could see things crumble again, and that small force stationed in Iraq will be in danger.  It is in the best interest of the forces stationed there, that the Iraqi military and police, along with government is able to maintain it’s power.  Will President Obama be committed to Iraq, or will he forsake Iraq if they are tested and shaken.  I tend to go with the idea that Iraq must learn to take care of itself. But like with a child learning to walk, you must be there to catch them if they fall, until they can walk without any assistance at all. I just don’t want our sacrifice and good work we have done in Iraq, to be all for not, just because we did not give the end of the war the proper attention it needs. 

     The other thing I wanted to mention is the vacuum created, once forces have left and Iraqi police and military are left to themselves.  The insurgency will certainly test these two tools of the state, and they will do all they can to make the public distrust or lack confidence in the police and military.  I go back to the Joker Effect, because it only takes a few guys, to really infuse chaos into a country.  For the end of this show, the insurgency will definitely do what they can to make all of the successes in Iraq, disappear under the pale of chaos.  If our standard for success in Iraq was peace and stability, then the standard of success for the insurgency in Iraq will be war and chaos.  Our departure and the end of the war will be the greatest test of the Iraqis, and of all the efforts we have put into this endeavor.  Only time will tell….-Matt

————————————–  

Obama’s Speech at Camp Lejeune, N.C.

February 27, 2009

Following are the prepared remarks of President Obama about withdrawing from Iraq at Camp Lejeune, N.C., on Feb. 27, 2009, as provided by the White House.

Good morning Marines. Good morning Camp Lejeune. Good morning Jacksonville. Thank you for that outstanding welcome. I want to thank Lieutenant General Hejlik for hosting me here today.

I also want to acknowledge all of our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. That includes the Camp Lejeune Marines now serving with – or soon joining – the Second Marine Expeditionary Force in Iraq; those with Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force in Afghanistan; and those among the 8,000 Marines who are preparing to deploy to Afghanistan. We have you in our prayers. We pay tribute to your service. We thank you and your families for all that you do for America. And I want all of you to know that there is no higher honor or greater responsibility than serving as your Commander-in-Chief.

(more…)

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Technology: War Robots, Ethics, and the Book ‘Wired for War’ by Peter Singer

Filed under: Books,Technology — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 11:24 AM

   What can I say?  We are now having this discussion, and it blows me away.  And as I speak, drones are killing folks in IraqAfghanistan, and Pakistan, and have been doing so for awhile.  The only safety measure is that they are so far not really autonomous.  But what happens when we cut the cord and let some robot or drone operate on it’s own?  What happens if that robot has a glitch and accidently kills the good guys?  Do you charge a robot with manslaughter, are they covered by the Geneva Convention, do we give them full burial honors at Arlington Cemetery when they pass?

  On a side note, I did get a chance to pick up Peter Singer’s book, and I read through it a little.  I will not give a full review, but there were some parts that were interesting.  Especially the section that discussed ground robots, and the first ever drawing of blood in this war by a ground robot.  Basically some soldiers put a Claymore mine on a MARCbot, and drove it into a pack of insurgents and blew them up. The total cost for that kill, about $8,000, plus whatever it costs the military for a claymore.  I think I could make or buy a cheaper Claymore carriage at a hobby store, but still, that field expedient weapon is a whole lot cheaper than launching a Javelin at the enemy. (and if it hurt the enemy and/or saved lives, bravo!)

   The insurgents came up with a similar type deal using a skateboard according to the book.  I guess they made an explosive laden skateboard with motors on the wheels.  The insurgents powered it up, and set it rolling slowly towards a patrol, thinking the patrol would not pay attention to a slow rolling toy.  Luckily the patrol locked on to the thing, because it was moving against the wind.  The total cost of this weapon was way cheaper than the MARCbot, but could have easily succeeded if used properly.

   So with these humble beginnings of ground combat robots, will we one day see a robot that thinks on it’s own?  I do know that the desire for these things is driving the market big time.  With a highly competitive robotics market and a war that is not going away anytime soon, we will begin to see these kinds of autonomous war robots that science fiction, and now academics are talking about.  Good or bad, the future is now. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Military robots must be taught a warrior code

16 Feb 2009

Autonomous military robots must be taught a strict warrior code or they could turn on their human masters, a US report warns.

I, Robot: Military robots must be taught a warrior code

The warnings of a potential revolt, as envisaged by the science writer Isaac Asimov in his chilling I, Robot series of stories, appear in the first major report on robot ethics Photo: 20TH CENTURY FOX

The warnings of a potential revolt, as envisaged by the science writer Isaac Asimov in his chilling I, Robot series of stories, appear in the first major report on robot ethics.

The report, by researchers from the Ethics and Emerging Technologies Group at California Polytechnic State University, was funded by the US navy office of naval research.

Mindful of the US deployment in two major theatres of war, the military is keen to pursue alternatives to manpower, including Terminator-style armed robots.

(more…)

Friday, February 13, 2009

War Art: Security Contractor Industry Comics, by LMS Defense and Company

Filed under: War Art — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 12:37 PM

   Hey gang, this is a treat. These guys have put together an excellent industry comic.  Also, stand by for future art from the good folks at LMS.  Here is a link to the photo at their blog. This one is called ‘The business, it’s a-changing…’. For credit, “Duke” is the artist, and LMS Defense has the copyright. –Matt 

——————————————————————-    LMS Defense 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress