Feral Jundi

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Weapons Stuff: Major Revamp Possible for M4 Carbine

Filed under: Afghanistan,Weapons,Weapons Stuff — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Matt @ 4:29 AM

   Cool, I guess.  My choice would be to just switch to a higher caliber rifle, as opposed to dressing up this varmint shooter we call the M4.

     If I was to add one more little addition to this list, that would be to make the Mk 262 round the standard round. Sure it would be expensive, and tough to make enough of them, but it could it be done. That 77 grn. bullet is awesome for this weapon, and truly juices every last drop of effectiveness out of the weapon called the M4. (just as long as you have the barrel to support that kind of ammunition)

     In my opinion, for the cross canyon fire fights in Afghanistan, you need something with reach and with knock-down power.  That little 5.56 round just doesn’t do it for me. Hell, I wouldn’t even use that round for hunting deer.  Any way…. –Matt

Edit: I want to point the readership to a voice of reason about these recent so-called ‘weapon failures’ in the war.  Paul Howe has a running newsletter, and he discussed this issue and his thoughts.  His focus was how to properly maintain your weapon and shooting accurately.  If a soldier goes through thirty magazines in a fight, then there should be a ton of dead enemy soldiers surrounding him. The M4 should not be used as a noise maker to scare the enemy to death. Anyway, check out what Paul had to say here.

—————————————————————-

Major revamp possible for M4 carbine

Army wants new barrel, faster fire and 4 other improvements

By Matthew Cox – Staff writer

Sunday Nov 22, 2009

The Army is considering a major redesign of the M4 aimed at making the weapon shoot cleaner and longer — at high rates of fire.

As the Army awaits Defense Department approval of a competition to find a new carbine, weapons officials have identified six fixes intended to address shortcomings in reliability, durability and handling of the Army’s inventory of more than 400,000 M4s.

Army weapons officials presented the proposed changes to Congress on Oct. 30. They are:

• Adding a heavier barrel for better performance during high rates of fire.

• Replacing the direct-impingement gas system with a piston gas system.

• Improving the trigger pull.

• Adding an improved rail system for increased strength.

• Adding ambidextrous controls.

• Adding a round counter to track the total number of bullets fired over the weapon’s lifetime.

(more…)

Monday, October 26, 2009

Funny Stuff: The MAV (Manned Aerial Vehicle), Armed With Hellfire Missiles!!!

Cessna Grand Caravan 208Bs, armed with a pair of AGM-114 Hellfire missiles each, were photographed flying out of Meacham Airport earlier this month. These are shipping out to the Iraqi Air Force according to this blog. (thanks to Doug for sending this)

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Cool Stuff: The Dillon Aero M 134 Gatling Gun, Mounted in a Suburban

Filed under: Cool Stuff,Video,Weapons — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 2:13 PM

Monday, October 12, 2009

Gear Review: Armor and Weapons in the War-The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

Filed under: Afghanistan,Gear Review — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:51 AM

   I think these three stories do a pretty good job of discussing what’s what in the war.  In the second story, there is a article mentioned in the UPI about weight versus mobility, that you can check out as well.  My take away from all of this is that armor is too heavy–duh, and our weapons suck.  The thing to ask, is are we able to catch the Taliban up in the mountains when we hunt him?  And better yet, do our troops have a weapon that will work as advertised when we catch up to these ‘miscreants’. (I love using that word, because that is what the Pakistanis call the Taliban–lol)

   Don’t get me wrong though, because many of these advances in weapons and armor is amazing and they have their place.  But we have to be realistic about what really wins battles up in those mountains, and against mountain people. –Matt

——————————————————————

Captains Journal

A soldier hiking in the hills of the Korengal Valley. 

Weapons failed US troops during Afghan firefight

October 12, 2009

By RICHARD LARDNER

Associated Press Writer

In the chaos of an early morning assault on a remote U.S. outpost in eastern Afghanistan, Staff Sgt. Erich Phillips’ M4 carbine quit firing as militant forces surrounded the base. The machine gun he grabbed after tossing the rifle aside didn’t work either.

When the battle in the small village of Wanat ended, nine U.S. soldiers lay dead and 27 more were wounded. A detailed study of the attack by a military historian found that weapons failed repeatedly at a “critical moment” during the firefight on July 13, 2008, putting the outnumbered American troops at risk of being overrun by nearly 200 insurgents.

Which raises the question: Eight years into the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan, do U.S. armed forces have the best guns money can buy?

Despite the military’s insistence that they do, a small but vocal number of troops in Afghanistan and Iraq has complained that the standard-issue M4 rifles need too much maintenance and jam at the worst possible times.

A week ago, eight U.S. troops were killed at a base near Kamdesh, a town near Wanat. There’s no immediate evidence of weapons failures at Kamdesh, but the circumstances were eerily similar to the Wanat battle: insurgents stormed an isolated stronghold manned by American forces stretched thin by the demands of war.

(more…)

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Weapons: Army Pushes Precision Mortar

Filed under: Military News,Weapons — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:12 AM

   I tell you, if we could pump out little miniature JDAM style mortars, how cool would that be?  Every grunt out there, would be worshiping these things.  That means less mortar rounds to hump around and more lethality with each shot.  If you could use some kind of pointer system, like a IR pointer or some laser as a means for guidance, then that would really be cool. Or just use a GPS coordinate.  Either way, a precision mortar round would be awesome.

   The system must also be easy to use and durable.  Once we make accurate munitions like this, tactics could be modified to take advantage of that accuracy.  That accuracy has to be consistent and dependable…Hopefully. This is the kind of thing that would bring more capability to the ‘super empowered infantry’ that these guys keep talking about. Oh, and make it small and light. (I know that is a fantasy, but it doesn’t hurt to dream. lol)

   Another thing they could do, is to make a smaller Javelin type of system.  Imagine something the size of a LAW?

   Or how about a precision RPG round?  Now that would be really cool, because then you could use those rounds, as well as captured enemy RPG rounds in a fight.  That saves weight, and that increases the lethality of a unit. Hell, Airtronics made an American version of the RPG 7, why not make a precision round for it and use it to kill Taliban and Jihadists? I guess I could hint at the idea of precision 40mm, but that would be crazy talk. lol –Matt

—————————————————————–

Army Pushes Precision Mortar

By Greg Grant

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

Afghanistan is an infantryman’s war. Afghan insurgents have mastered fighting small unit actions in mountains terrain where they use skillfully prepared fighting positions on ridgelines and high ground. Springing ambushes from prepared positions, Taliban insurgents offer fleeting targets to direct fire weapons; which explains in part why the Army has received an urgent request from soldiers in the field for a precision guided mortar and has accelerated its efforts to develop and deliver the new weapon.

The “accelerated precision mortar initiative” is all about providing added firepower to the rifle platoon, said Army Maj. Gen. John Bartley, program manager for the Brigade Combat Team, who said the Army’s requirement is to precisely deliver indirect fire from as small a tube as possible. “You can hump a mortar, you can’t hump a Non-Line of Sight Launch System,” he said, referring to the “rockets in a box” missile system that came out of the now dead FCS program.

The Army is looking at a range of potential sizes for the round, from 60mm on up to 120mm, which is currently the most commonly used mortar “Ideally, you would like to give one to everyone… what is the art of the possible is to be determined.” The Army has not decided whether the precision mortar will be laser guided or will use GPS.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress