Feral Jundi

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Industry Talk: Being Criticized For Arming Yourself In A War Zone, By The Juicebox Mafia

   More ramblings from the Juicebox Mafia (thanks to Blackfive for that one-lol).  These contractors were working in a war zone, where people want to kill them. Why are we then criticizing them for wanting to be armed, or actually receiving weapons from a military unit that just handed them over?  I see no problems at all with that process, and this is some serious whining from the critics that haven’t a clue. It’s a war zone, you dorks.

    I also think that if these weapons were in US military possession, then they can issue them out to whomever they please.  Hell, to not give these guys a weapon should be a crime.  These contractors are the guys tasked with training Afghans, and there have been several reported incidents of ‘werewolves’ or basically good guys that go bad and shoot trainers or soldiers. To not have a weapon to deal with that, or any attacks on persons out in the war zone, is just stupid.

    If there is to be any criticism at all, it should be geared towards the US military folks tasked with watching those weapons. I don’t have a beef with what they did though, and it sounds to me like these military guys were just trying to help out the Paravant guys, so they could defend themselves in a war zone. Whoaa, that’s crazy talk… arming yourself in a war zone?  Crazy.

   Also, this is not a new practice.  In both Iraq and Afghanistan, weapons captured on the battlefield that were slated for destruction or just sitting in a Conex box, were often just given away to contractors who needed them for protective work.  This is a very common practice, and especially in the beginning of the wars. It was not uncommon to see many different types of weapon systems in the hands of contractors, all because they were able to get a hook up from a military unit that wanted to get rid of the stuff.

    To be honest, I would much rather see those weapons in the hands of contractors, as opposed to the enemy or in a demolition pit. Of course it would be nice for everything to be registered and controlled, but in this case, all I see is the military trying to help out some contractors that wanted a means to defend themselves in a war zone. Or maybe Senator Levin wishes to deny contractors their right to self defense in a war zone? The enemy would love that one. Pfffft. –Matt

——————————————————————–

Key senator plans to lambast Blackwater actions in Afghanistan

February 24, 2010

Washington (CNN) — The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee plans to unleash a withering attack Wednesday on private contractors working for the company formerly known as Blackwater in Afghanistan, accusing them of flouting regulations and endangering the U.S. mission.

Key to beating the Taliban in Afghanistan will be the ability of U.S. forces to win support from the Afghan people, many of whom do not distinguish between U.S. contractors and the U.S. military, Sen. Carl Levin will say, according to an advance text of his remarks.

“If we are going to win that struggle, we need to know that our contractor personnel are adequately screened, supervised and held accountable — because in the end, the Afghan people will hold us responsible for their actions,” the Michigan Democrat will say.

(more…)

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Law Enforcement: Officers Lose 243 Homeland Security Guns

   Interesting report, and I thought private industry was bad.  These guys are government and the report only covers two years! I wonder how many weapons were lost in all the other years not covered in the report? –Matt

——————————————————————

Report: Officers lose 243 Homeland Security guns

February 18, 2010

Washington (CNN) — Nearly 180 Department of Homeland Security weapons were lost — some falling into the hands of criminals — after officers left them in restrooms, vehicles and other public places, according to an inspector general report.

The officers, with Customs and Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, “did not always sufficiently safeguard their firearms and, as a result, lost a significant number of firearms” between fiscal year 2006 and fiscal year 2008, the report said.

In all, 243 firearms were lost in both agencies during that period, according to the January report from Inspector General Richard Skinner. Of those, 36 were lost because of circumstances beyond officers’ control — for instance, ICE lost a firearm during an assault on an officer. Another 28 were lost even though officers had stored them in lockboxes or safes.

But 74 percent, or 179 guns, were lost “because officers did not properly secure them,” the report said.

Following a review of the draft report in December, Homeland Security took steps to implement its recommendations and overhaul its property management policy, according to a response in the report. A department spokeswoman did not immediately return a call from CNN Thursday seeking comment.

(more…)

Sunday, February 14, 2010

Weapons: Some Thoughts On Battlefield Lasers

Filed under: Medical,Weapons — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 11:57 AM

     Since November 2008, the 3rd ESC has had 64 laser incidents reported in Iraq, resulting in 45 documented injuries to soldiers. Two of those injuries were permanent — one soldier is now legally blind in one eye, Hayes said.

     Both Multi-National Corps—Iraq and 3rd ESC Commander Brig. Gen. Michael Lally are stepping up laser safety and training efforts, including confiscating some unapproved lasers and establishing green laser training requirements and detailed safety accident reporting and training, officials said.

*****

   These two articles below brought up a couple of interesting points that guys in war zones are going to have to think about in the future and even now.  Having a pair of sunglasses or goggles with laser protective lenses is going to be more important to have, as lasers develop and find their way onto the battlefield in new and interesting ways.  The military is already experiencing laser injuries with  basic laser aiming devices, and I only see that increasing on the military side of things.  But are there statistics on contractor injuries, and is the industry ready for this coming evolutions of battlefield lasers?

   In the first article below, they discuss weaponized lasers and how the DoD wants to purchase Revision eyewear for the troops. We will probably see many offerings of laser protected lenses coming on to the the tactical eyewear scene, as it should.  As for companies issuing this type of protection, who knows.  More than likely it will take numerous injuries before they react and do the right thing.  Or it will take a mandate by the DoD, much like with body armor and helmets, in order to operate on the battlefield. Until then, it will more than likely fall back on the individual contractor to decide if they want to wear the stuff.

   Which leads me to my next point.  Perhaps the laser coating or whatever protective element to the glasses, should become standard for tactical eyewear?  Like under new Milspec standards, ballistics protection would include protection against lasers.  I know this is nothing new and is being talked about in military circles. The military even has a manual on laser range safety.  But that is for laser range finder/pointer stuff, and this new generation of battlefield lasers are just a tad bit more lethal.

   And as the second article on laser injuries indicates, those dazzling green lasers that you see the troops use all the time, are actually causing blindness and eye injuries.  Yikes.  With that said, I wonder how many contractors have been hit with green lasers intentionally or accidently while on the battlefield?  How many guys coming up on check points manned by overzealous guards, were zapped by those things?  Laser protective eyewear should be something to think about.

   With the really big stuff coming on to the scene, the problems I could see, is the accidental reflection maybe?  A large beam hits a car mirror and reflects it onto a convoy or something? Or they bounce a laser off of a satellite reflector or a drone reflector, and now you have ‘death rays’ coming from the sky. lol

    If they get that Boeing 747 with a laser in the nose operational, then they could be throwing beams from that.  On the plus side, these lasers will be much more precise than dropping a bomb, but I wonder if an enemy could use a mirror and use that large beam to their advantage?  Or the enemy could get into making really high powered green or blue lasers, and try to blind soldiers or ignite gas tanks and fuel stations from a distance.  They could also start wildfires with the things, in order to entrap patrols with fire. There are plenty of DIY hacks on youtube in order to make such lasers, and their uses are only limited by their imagination.

   Now another thing I was thinking about, is using these high powered lasers to target individuals. It’s one thing to use them to destroy jets, mortars, rockets, and whatnot in the air.  But to take one dude out, in a group of people, with a well placed laser shot, would be impressive. It would trump using a Hellfire, and taking out entire villages to just get one guy.       I could see bouncing a laser off of a reflector, guided by satellite, and right into the cranium of some Taliban leader who is surrounded by women and children. That would pretty much destroy the enemy’s ability to protect themselves with human shields, or to use collateral damage for propaganda purposes. You could also use the thing to take out IED’s, snipers or machine gun emplacements.  Now that I think about it, I could totally picture a drone circling the battlefield, and using the onboard targeting system to feed into the satellite reflector, and zapping enemy combatants like flies. Who knows, but one thing is for sure, lasers on the battlefield are on the rise and they are just one more thing to think about out there. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Ray Guns Real: Army Betting Big on Laser Weapons

Gene J. Koprowski

January 21, 2010

The military envisions a future of laser warfare — ultra-precise weapons based on devastatingly powerful beams of light. It’s only a matter of time until the U.S. Army fights terrorists and other enemy combatants with laser beams, engaging in battles seen previously only in movies like ‘Starship Troopers’ and ‘Star Trek.’

The ray gun is real … or at least it will be soon.

The U.S. Army is betting big on laser warfare — designing, testing and perfecting ultra-precise weapons based on devastatingly powerful beams of light. And given recent developments, it’s only a matter of time until the military has in its arsenal a weapon that until now has been the staple of science fiction — the ray gun.

Set your phasers to kill.

Boeing, one of the Pentagon’s top contractors, already has a laser weapon that will improve the military’s ability to counter artillery, mortar, drone aircraft and even rockets, a spokesman tells FoxNews.

Boeing’s is the highest-profile program of all of the projects under development for the Department of Defense, and last week it took a step closer to reality. At its facility in Huntsville, Ala., Boeing accepted a military truck built by Oshkosh Defense that will carry its laser beam control system into battle.

(more…)

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Weapons Stuff: New Groups Mobilize As Indians Embrace The Right To Bear Arms

Filed under: India,Weapons Stuff — Tags: , , , , , , , — Matt @ 11:34 PM

“I feel safe wearing it in my ankle holster every day,” said Verma, 27, who runs a family business selling fire-protection systems. “I have a right to self-protection, because random street crime and terrorism have increased. The police cannot be there for everybody all the time. Now I am a believer in the right to keep and bear arms.”    

*****

   This is great news, and I certainly hope that Indian gun owners are able to keep up the fight and secure their rights.  The best part of the article though, was that little quote I put up top.  The outcome of the Mumbai attack is that the police or military ‘cannot be there for everybody all the time’. Governments instead should be empowering their citizens to not only protect themselves, but actively help pass down information that leads to the arrest and capture of criminals and terrorists.  To not just roll over on the ground and pee on themselves in the face of danger, and to stand up to these criminals and terrorists.

   Of course the police and military needs to continue to do all they can to defend the country, as they should, but the state definitely should not get hung up on this monopoly on the application of the use of force they think they are supposed to have.  Plus, having an armed citizenry will only enhance the defense of a country and keep their leaders in check. –Matt

—————————————————————-

New groups mobilize as Indians embrace the right to bear arms

By Rama LakshmiMonday, February 1, 2010

In the land of Mahatma Gandhi, Indian gun owners are coming out of the shadows for the first time to mobilize, U.S.-style, against proposed new curbs on bearing arms.

When gunmen attacked 10 sites in Mumbai in November 2008, including two five-star hotels and a train station, Mumbai resident Kumar Verma sat at home glued to the television, feeling outraged and unsafe.

Before the end of December, Verma and his friends had applied for gun licenses. He read up on India’s gun laws and joined the Web forum Indians for Guns. When he got his license seven months later, he bought a black, secondhand, snub-nose Smith & Wesson revolver with a walnut grip.

(more…)

Haiti: Food Convoy Attacked; U.N. Warns Of Volatility

   Folks are just going to get more angry and frustrated as this continues, and that is expected.  But to me, this looks more like an outcome of individuals taking advantage of a weakened state.  They could be part of the crew that escaped from the prison during the quake, and no doubt they will do what they can to take advantage.

   In other news, there is a new weapons policy for government guys heading to Haiti for work.  Check it out here. –Matt

——————————————————————

Haiti food convoy attacked; UN warns of volatility

By PAISLEY DODDS, Associated Press Writer Paisley Dodds,

February 2, 2010

PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti – Twenty armed men blocked a road and tried to hijack a convoy of food for earthquake victims, but were driven off by police gunfire, U.N. officials said Tuesday.

The attack on the convoy as it carried supplies from an airport in the southern town of Jeremie underscored what the United Nations calls a “potentially volatile” security situation as frustration has grown at the slow pace of aid since the Jan. 12 earthquake.

Most quake victims are still living outside in squalid tents of sheets and sticks and aid officials acknowedge they have not yet gotten food to the majority of those in need. Mobs have stolen food and looted goods from their neighbors in the camps, prompting many to band together or stay awake at night to prevent raids.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress