Feral Jundi

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

PMC 2.0: Bullets and Blogs–New Media and the Warfighter

Filed under: PMC 2.0,Publications,Technology — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:37 PM

    Hear me now. All of you CEO’s and upper level management throughout all of the companies need to pay attention.  If you do not have a new media strategy, then you are in the wrong.  Just think of it this way.  Companies invest in vehicles, armor, training, and weapons to protect their contractors, so they in turn can protect their client.  So why are companies not investing in new media protocols in order to protect their clients from information warfare attacks?

   If the enemy attacks your motorcade in a population center, then films the exchange of fire and then purposely shoots a few civilians and then films that, and then claims that they were shot by contractors. Then they post it on the internet immediately afterwards and spreads that poison throughout the new media battle space.  Then all those journalists and contractor haters, along with the John Q public, all take it in and label your company as evil, and without question.  Is your company set up to defend against that? Can you defend against a Nisour Square style propaganda attack?

   How about journalists using new media to promote personal agendas, as opposed to being fair or balanced in their reportage?  Guess what?  That’s a threat to your client as well.  Is your company set up to defend against that? It should be, because if you were fully involved with new media strategy and counter-attacks, then you would have the foresight to do what is necessary.  It is called being prepared–one of the many tenets of Jundism.

   The report below can be summed up in one main theme:

Recognize that the winning strategy is “information engagement,” not “information control;” 

Embrace new media as a significant enabler of “that element of combat power called  information;” 

   So is your company set up for ‘information engagement’?  From the looks of it, most of the companies out there are doing a terrible job of information engagement.  And believe me, I am a security contractor who also happens to be a new media practitioner, and I have yet to see any of the companies take the necessary measures to operate in the new media battle space.  At least the military is talking about it, and bravo to them. –Matt

——————————————————————

Executive summary

Winning in the new media battlespace: Workshop top takeaways

For the U.S. military, new media and the Global Information Environment (GIE) present sustained challenges and opportunities. In recent years, new adversaries — armed with new media capabilities and an information-led warfighting strategy — have proven themselves capable of stopping the most powerful militaries in the world.

The current and future geo-strategic environment requires preparation for a battlespace in which symbolic informational wins may precipitate strategic effects equivalent to, or greater than, lethal operations. It demands a paradigm shift away from an emphasis on information control and towards information engagement. It will require cultural and organizational change within the Department of Defense (DOD) as it adapts to the world of digital natives – its own savvy Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines and their communicative expectations, proclivities, potential and risk; as well as its current and over-the-horizon opponents. Most of all, it will force the sustained adaptation and transformation of the way the U.S. military thinks and fights.

(more…)

Video: Held By the Taliban, Interview with David Rohdes

Filed under: Afghanistan,Pakistan,Video — Tags: , , — Matt @ 2:16 PM

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Company Spotlight: India’s Topsgrup

Filed under: India,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 1:18 PM

     -In May 2008 Topsgrup acquired a 51 percent controlling interest in UK-based Shield Guarding, a $121 million security services provider. The company is now raising money to buy out the remaining 49 percent in Shield Guarding and possibly acquire newer companies. “We have signed a memorandum of understanding with a $300 million US security company for acquiring them. After that we want to get into the Middle East, Africa and some parts of Asia as well,” says Nanda.

     -Neems to agree, relating a recent incident when the CEO of the American company he planned to acquire told him, “Rahul if the deal happens, please don’t say an Indian company has acquired us.”

“I understood where he came from,” he adds. “Eighty-five percent of Americans don’t have passports and think America is the world. For them India, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan are all in the same breath.”

     –Holding on to local brands is something even the big players have often done, like G4S with Wackenhut and Securitas with Pinkerton’s in the US. But being a hands-off investor might be a risky strategy, all the more so because the companies Topsgrup acquires outside India might in many cases be significantly bigger than itself. 

*****

   What I have done up top, is to cut out the key portions of this article that really stood out for me.  I haven’t a clue who Topsgrup plans on buying out, but whomever it is, stand by and I wish you well. I have worked for companies that were bought out while I was employed there, and it is always a little unnerving.  Topsgrup is at least trying to maintain some stability with it’s purchases by keeping the key figure heads in place.

   Like I mentioned before with Terraforce, I am kind of out of the loop with the Indian security market, and I really don’t know much about them.  But management and leadership issues are a universal theme, and I could care less what country you are from, you are either universally accepted as a performer or you are not.

   If Topsgrup is a student of the industry, they will learn from the Kabul Fiasco and know that they must care about what is going on with the contracts of their newly acquired companies.  Get some shared reality, and make sure your ‘new’ employees and contractors are actually getting taken care of.  Or that your leaders are only doing good things for the company, and not destroying a company with the poor management of people and contracts.

    Basic stuff really, but given what had happened with AGNA and their relationship (or lack there of) with Wackenhut, I am pretty skeptical of any company that calls itself organized or compassionate about employees/contractors.  Actions speak louder than words Jack.

     If any readers have some inside scoop, please feel free to speak up.  I would be very curious to know who this US company is? Or if you are with Shield, let us know how that is going.  The other angle on this, is it could all be hot air.  Please note that Topsgrup was talking about purchasing this ‘mystery US company’ May of last year.  What gives? –Matt

Topsgrup Website here.

——————————————————————-

Topsgrup

Elvis Has Left Town

Diwan Rahul Nanda has spent the last 15 years building Topsgrup into India’s second largest private security provider. Now he is staking it all to become a global player

by Rohin Dharmakumar | Oct 27, 2009

The Man: Diwan Rahul Nanda, 37, Chairman

The Company: Topsgrup. With close to 85,000 employees and Rs. 867 crore in revenue, it is the second largest security services provider in India.

His Goal: Create a multinational security behemoth from India by acquiring other security companies around the globe.

The Risks: Acceptance of an Indian company in Western markets will be a challenge, especially as private security companies there run jails, man borders and guard cities. Nanda will have to battle perceptions about Indian companies being synonymous with cost cutting and lowered standards for training.

Around 1.15 p.m. on October 7, an auto-rickshaw pulls up outside Gate 2 of Hewlett-Packard’s campus in Bangalore’s Electronic City suburb. The lone passenger in the auto-rickshaw, a young man of average build, pays off the driver and hurriedly walks through the campus gates along with a group of other employees. He is carrying a shoulder bag.

Diwan Rahul Nanda, Chairman, Topsgroup

When one of the security guards asks him for his identity card, he tells him that it is inside his pocket. He is lying, for HP had sacked him over three years ago. Since then he had found it impossible to find another stable job in India’s IT capital. Worse, his wife had left him a year back, taking their daughter with her.

(more…)

Monday, October 26, 2009

Funny Stuff: The MAV (Manned Aerial Vehicle), Armed With Hellfire Missiles!!!

Cessna Grand Caravan 208Bs, armed with a pair of AGM-114 Hellfire missiles each, were photographed flying out of Meacham Airport earlier this month. These are shipping out to the Iraqi Air Force according to this blog. (thanks to Doug for sending this)

Military News: 14 Americans Killed in 2 Helicopter Crashes

Filed under: Afghanistan,Military News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 2:02 PM

   Rest in peace to the fallen.  In the fire fighting industry, air crashes are the number one cause of deaths.  It is an unfortunate reality of using aircraft for logistics and support, but something we can’t get away from.  All we can do is to continue to apply Kaizen to all air operations, and find the weaknesses that could contribute to future accidents and correct them.  We will never be free of accidents or shoot downs in war, and I am surprised we don’t see more of these incidents.

   Also, there were more than just Americans killed in these incidents, and the Afghani deaths matter too. I wish the main stream media would get that point as well.

   It is also important to note that there were DEA deaths in these crashes.  I am assuming these are the FAST Team guys, and my heart goes out to the friends and family of the fallen as well. The DEA has been pretty active in Afghanistan, and it was only a matter of time before they would start suffering losses like this. –Matt

—————————————————————–

14 Americans killed in 2 helicopter crashes

By Heidi Vogt

Monday Oct 26, 2009

KABUL — Helicopter crashes killed 14 Americans on Monday — 11 troops and three drug agents — in the deadliest day for the U.S. mission in Afghanistan in more than four years. The deaths came as President Barack Obama prepared to meet his national security team for a sixth full-scale conference on the future of the troubled war.

In the deadliest crash, a helicopter went down in the west of the country after leaving the scene of a firefight, killing 10 Americans — seven troops and three Drug Enforcement Administration agents. Eleven American troops, one U.S. civilian and 14 Afghans were also injured.

In a separate incident, two Marine helicopters — one UH-1 and an AH-1 Cobra — collided in flight before sunrise over the southern province of Helmand, killing four American troops and wounding two more, Marine spokesman Maj. Bill Pelletier said.

It was the heaviest single-day loss of life since June 28, 2005, when 16 U.S. troops on a special forces helicopter died when their MH-47 Chinook helicopter was shot down by insurgents. The casualties also mark the first DEA deaths in Afghanistan since it began operations there in 2005.

U.S. authorities have ruled out hostile fire in the collision but have not given a cause for the other fatal crash in the west. Taliban spokesman Qari Yusuf Ahmedi claimed Taliban fighters shot down a helicopter in northwest Badghis province’s Darabam district. It was impossible to verify the claim and unclear if he was referring to the same incident.

Military spokeswoman Elizabeth Mathias said hostile fire was unlikely because the troops were not receiving fire when the helicopter took off.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress