Feral Jundi

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Mexico: Drug War Update–Tijuana Gets A Tough Guy, Drug Cartels Lose Leyva

    Big news with the drug war down south.  The Mexican Navy kills Beltran Leyva, a major drug boss with a two million dollar bounty on his head.  No word if anyone actually collected on that bounty.

    The other story that grabbed my attention is the new security jefe in Tijuana.  This guy is definitely working on being ‘bad ass of the week’.  I just hope he stays alive long enough to do some damage upon the cartels.

   Finally, I would like to say that if Mexico thinks they are doing all they can to stop these guys, think again.  Mexico could certainly open up the cartel killing market using the Letter of Marque concept, and open up a new front in the drug war.

     Mexico has a bounty system for these cartels already, but in order for it to work properly, they need to bring in companies under that system. Individuals, who have no way of protecting themselves and fear retribution if they turn in a drug boss or his buddies, are not likely to partake in a bounty system. But entire companies will join in, because they have the means to protect itself and usually has the kind of guys who can take care of themselves.

     And if there are hundreds of companies going after cartels, along with the police and military, well then you have a diversified strategy with a total drug war concept. More importantly, they need to give the companies involved with taking on the cartels, legal protections–hence the reason behind the LoM.

    One last thing. Mexico is not a signatory of the Declaration of Paris. And what is really cool about the LoM, is it is warfare on the cheap.  Just the kind of solution a country would need in case they ran out of money do to a protracted war or were in a deep recession because of other factors throughout the world.

     Drug cartels are loaded with loot, they fight to bring over billions of dollars of hard cash into the US in order to launder it, and they buy all sorts of ridiculous things with that money.  Privateers would love to take that wealth away from the cartels as well as kill or capture individuals to collect on the state offered bounties.  Seems pretty logical to me.  Dios mio. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Death of a Mexican drug lord

Mexican forces won this battle, killing Arturo Beltran Leyva. But the war is far from over.

December 19, 2009

Understandably, Mexican President Felipe Calderon is trumpeting the navy’s success in taking down Arturo Beltran Leyva, wanted in the United States and Mexico for his part in the $15-billion to $20-billion-a-year drug trade. He was a criminal known to behead his rivals and believed to be responsible for last year’s killing of the federal police chief in his Mexico City home; he was the most powerful cartel boss to be removed by security forces since Calderon launched his drug war in 2006. The operation reportedly was the result of improved U.S.-Mexican intelligence cooperation, and although the naval troops failed to take Beltran Leyva and six cohorts alive, it should yield a trove of new information. Moreover, the battle between cartel grenades and the navy’s mounted machine guns was carried out without civilian casualties or, apparently, some of the other abuses that have marked army operations.For all the accomplishments, however, the operation reveals the extent of unfinished business in Calderon’s campaign. Beltran Leyva was discovered at a luxury apartment complex near the governor’s mansion in the city of Cuernavaca, just south of the national capital. Clearly he felt he had bought enough protection from security forces to stray far from his home base in Sinaloa and into the weekend getaway for Mexico City’s rich. But someone either infiltrated his inner circle or turned on him — possibly for the $2-million bounty on his head. (more…)

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Military News: Georgia And The War In Afghanistan, By Mikheil Saakashvili

   This is actually pretty interesting.  This is a thousand troops that the Marines can use to do all sorts of violent things with, and with no limitations.  But the most interesting aspect is Georgia wants in NATO, and this is kind of a double sided insurance policy.

   On one side, a move like this will help to up the level of combat effectiveness of the Georgian military.  Marines are already training Georgians in their country, and they were doing that even before Georgia’s quick war with Russia.  I think a move like this is smart, because now the Georgians will have combat veterans that could make life for an invading force a little more painful if not damn near impossible.

   The other side of this is Mikheil is also trying to earn his country’s admission into NATO, so that Russia would think twice before invading again.  The question I have, is if Russia would actually care if Georgia was a NATO member or not?  Because I think Russia will do whatever they want, despite what club Georgia is a member of.

   Now if I was Mikheil, I would develop an asymmetric warfare capability big time.  Keep working on this other diplomatic stuff, but if these guys want to make life miserable for an invading force again, they need to start thinking more like Hezbollah and less like some kind of a conventional army. Get some combat time, learn from the enemy in Afghanistan, and apply those lessons to defending Georgia.  The Marines will definitely help them to get there, and help them with the asymmetric stuff as well. –Matt

——————————————————————

Georgia and the War in Afghanistan

December 19, 2009

Why the young democracy is sending nearly 1,000 troops to the war effort.

By MIKHEIL SAAKASHVILI

Following President Obama’s speech on our common mission in Afghanistan, NATO members and other countries pledged about 7,000 additional troops. My country committed just under 1,000, which makes Georgia the highest per-capita troop contributor to the war effort.

Some might be surprised that a small country not yet in NATO—and partly occupied by more than 10,000 hostile Russian troops—would make this commitment to an Allied mission abroad. Let me explain why it makes perfect sense.

As President Obama pointed out, the threat of violent extremism endangers all nations that subscribe to the principles of liberal democracy. Those principles made America the target on 9/11. Spain was hit on March 11, 2004, and Britain on July 7, 2005. Any of our countries could be next.

(more…)

Jobs: U.K./European Close Protection Specialists, Afghanistan

   Get the word out on this one folks.  Unity is trying to fill these positions quick, and the deadline for applications is December 21st.  I am not the point of contact or recruiter for this job, and please follow the directions below on what they are looking for.  Good luck and have a Merry Tactical Christmas. lol. –Matt

Edit: 12/21/2009- By the way, Hart Security won the EUPOL contract for Kabul, and I do not know for sure if URG is recruiting for Hart or if they thought they were going to win it.  So just to be safe, I posted the ad for Hart in the comments as well.

—————————————————————–

UK/ European Close Protection Specialists Wanted for Afghanistan (Team Leaders and Operators)

Unity are looking for a large number of CP specialists for an upcoming contract in Kabul. Candidates will be:

1. Qualified in a recognised CP course (essential).

2. Have experience in close protection roles (essential) with Afghan experience (highly desirable).

3. Be mature, highly disciplined, well groomed and capable of working with courtesy inside complex client groups (essential).

4. Hold an EU Passport (highly desirable).

5. Ready to work from the middle of January 2010 (essential).

6. Holding a current SIA license (desirable).

Potential candidates should note that Unity has very strict Code of Conduct and is an employer with the highest ethical standards. Unity is always rigid in its enforcement of standards and professionalism. You can expect to work alongside true like minded industry professionals and inside an exceptional operating culture.

We value our staff and our employment terms and conditions are best in industry. Pay will be in Euros and highly attractive. Rotations are expected to be 12/4 for most positions.

All applications (CVs only please) should be directed to:

recruiting @ unityresourcesgroup.com

 No later than 21 December 2009. Any CVs not sent to this address can expect to be disregarded. Only successful candidates will be contacted and this should occur before 31 Dec 2009.

Website for Unity Resources Group here.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Cool Stuff: Bad Ass Of The Week

Filed under: Books,Cool Stuff — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 9:19 AM

   This is pure cool stuff. lol This website lists a different character of history every week, and they have a book as well. –Matt

——————————————————————

 

You’ve reached the Badass of the Week, your one-stop shop for all things badassery-related.  Scroll down for this week’s badass, or just go ahead and search through the complete list of all badasses that have been featured on the site.  I update the page every Friday, so if you give a crap feel free to check back in next week to satisfy your insatiable desire to read about grown people punching each other in the mouth or beating each other about the head and neck in a most furious manner.

You should probably also be aware that this site features an unnecessarily copious amount of profanity, so if you’re easily offended by that sort of thing then this would be a good time for you to turn off your computer and go join a convent.

Website here.

Buy the book here.

Publications: CNAS–Contractors in American Conflicts, by John Nagl and Richard Fontaine

   Ok folks, this is pretty important.  CNAS, like I have mentioned before, has the ears of the guys that advise the President on matters like this one.  As you can see, John Nagl is personally involved on this working paper, and you can read his stamp all over this thing. I have been waiting for this paper for awhile, and I am glad they are finally pulling the trigger.

   It is a quick read and the best I could come up with on this, is that CNAS is trying to make the administration feel better for using contractors in the war.  To say ‘it’s ok, we have been using them for awhile, and contractors are the way of the future’. Oh, and we are going to rebrand contractors by calling them ES&R contractors. (Blackwater, eat your heart out)

    You get the idea.  President Obama owns this ‘just war’ now and the increase in the use of contractors is under his watch.  Matter of fact, contractor use has gone up under his leadership, and in Afghanistan we outnumber the troops. Yee haw.  Finally there is a recognition of that fact over at CNAS, and this paper is proof of that.

   With that said, the administration needs ammo for the conversations they have with those who oppose the use of contractors within their party.  Especially with President Obama’s far left supporters and even his more moderate supporters. He needs us for this war, and his party needs some convincing as to the why.

   The reason why I mention the political aspects of this paper, is because the mention of Bosnia and the use of contractors there under the Clinton Administration was very much emphasized.  Nagl and company wanted the reader to know that contractors are not just a tool of the Bush administration and the Republicans.  That the Democrats have a pretty good history of using and enjoying the benefits of contractors during times of conflict as well. Or better yet, we are a tool of America and not some political party.

   So why do I like this paper?  Well it is finally a legitimization of this industry, and at the highest levels of defense think tankery.  CNAS has the ear of all the President’s men, and generals for that matter.  These guys are saying we are a necessity for the war and for future wars, and it is time to figure out how to properly use this tool of warfare called contracting.  It is about smart contracting and dealing with reality.

   Personally, I just think we need strong leadership to make the common sense/necessary decisions to square away contracting.  To demand quality service from contractors, trust but verify that service, and insure tax payer dollars are wisely spent. And then just apply Kaizen to the whole thing to make sure it remains kick ass. If you guys need more people in government to manage these contracts, then get off your ass and hire some folks to get the job done. We are in a recession right now, and I am sure you could get some more people to help out.

   Below I have also put up a few critiques of the paper. (bold is my statement, quoted chunks are CNAS)  One is about the new name CNAS came up for us–‘ES&R contractors’. It has a terrible ring to it. lol  The other is about a lack of proper historical reference–no mention of privateers or the Indian WarsBuffalo Bill Cody was a contractor that received a Medal of Honor, and no mention of that? Wow, talk about selective history recollection? The final one is just a little bit of slam on ‘smart contracting’.  We need good leaders who know their stuff, have the courage to do what is right, and takes care of their people.  Once we have those, then we can implement smart contracting or whatever strategy you want to pursue. Overall, good stuff and I can’t wait for the final product.-Matt

—————————————————————-

Contractors in American Conflicts: Adapting to a New Reality

Publication Type: Working Papers

Publication Date: 12/16/2009

Author(s): Richard Fontaine , John Nagl

When our nation goes to war, contractors go with it. Contractors have become an enduring feature of modern American conflicts, and the United States cannot now engage in hostilities or in reconstruction and stabilization operations without them. At their peak, there were more contractors on the ground in Iraq than American troops in uniform and there are more contractors today in Afghanistan than there are U.S. troops on the ground.However, while private security contractors (PSC) like Blackwater (now knows as Xe Services) have gotten the bulk of public and congressional attention,  they only compromise about 5 percent of all contractors in hostile environments – this working paper, which is part of the CNAS project Contracting in Conflicts , addresses the other 95 percent. That 95 percent represents the vast majority of all the tasks carried out by U.S. contractors in theater, and it has been plagued by its own set of problems – including insufficient oversight, inadequate integration into operational planning, and ambiguous legal status. In order for the United States to adapt to the key role that contractors will play in future hostilities, it must establish new policies and rules of the road.

PDF for paper here.

Edit: 12/22/2009 – CBS posted a story about this as well.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress