Feral Jundi

Monday, October 5, 2009

Strategy: Ten Steps to Victory in Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Strategy — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 8:45 PM

 Break guerillas’ moral-mental-physical hold over the population, destroy their cohesion, and bring about their collapse via political initiative that demonstrates moral legitimacy and vitality of government and by relentless military operations that emphasize stealth/fast-tempo/fluidity-of-action and cohesion of overall effort.

*If you cannot realize such a political program, you might consider changing sides! -Page 108, Patterns of Conflict, Col. John Boyd

*****

     I liked this op-ed because it was short and sweet.  Each expert gave a quick rundown on what needs to happen, and it was cool to hear them reduce their thoughts on the matter to what is most important.  It is twitter-like in a way.

     With Twitter, you have 140 characters to produce something that is meaningful.  It forces you to really think about what you want to say, because you are limited.  And really, if you know the solution or solutions to the problem, and you have some conviction and passion about it, then it shouldn’t take you that long to communicate it. Less is more, less is more…..

     Either way, check out these strategies, and the rock star strategists attached to these suckers, and let me know what you think. –Matt

——————————————————————-

10 Steps to Victory in Afghanistan

October 4, 2009

Op-Ed Contributors

Reform or Go Home

COUNTERINSURGENCY is only as good as the government it supports. NATO could do everything right — it isn’t — but will still fail unless Afghans trust their government. Without essential reform, merely making the government more efficient or extending its reach will just make things worse.

Only a legitimately elected Afghan president can enact reforms, so at the very least we need to see a genuine run-off election or an emergency national council, called a loya jirga, before winter. Once a legitimate president emerges, we need to see immediate action from him on a publicly announced reform program, developed in consultation with Afghan society and enforced by international monitors. Reforms should include firing human rights abusers and drug traffickers, establishing an independent authority to investigate citizen complaints and requiring officials to live in the districts they are responsible for (fewer than half do).

(more…)

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Jobs: Executive Protection Professional, Washington State

Filed under: Executive Protection,Jobs,Washington — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 9:22 PM

     This sounds like an excellent opportunity for you Washingtonians out there.  I haven’t a clue who the company is that they are hiring for, nor am I the point of contact for this job.  Just passing on the info.

     Also, if you are in the market for security manager type stuff, this headhunter company is pretty good at getting the gigs. Check them out from time to time if you are in the market for stuff like this. –Matt

——————————————————————

Executive Protection Professional

Confidential

Posted 9/30/2009

Location WA – Washington

Salary $78,000 – $95,000

Department Security

Qualifications

SUMMARY:

 This non-exempt position’s main focus will be to safeguard principal from safety and security hazards. The job requires a high level of personal integrity and honesty, confidentiality, good judgment, strong problem-solving skills, especially under pressure, and the capacity to follow instructions.

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:

The first responsibilities of the Executive Protection Professional will include assisting and shadowing a senior specialist in a variety of duties and the completion of trainings in protective services, driver, medical, firearms, and defensive tactics.

(more…)

Military News: U.S, Afghan Troops Beat Back Bold Enemy Assault in Nuristan

   This is the question to ask. Did we kill hundreds of Taliban, or did eight of our own die?  Do you call this a success or a failure?  I mean in wars, people die, and battles often require an investment in blood.  So did we get a return on investment in this battle?  That is what I want to hear about.

   What a fight I tell you, and my heart goes out to the friends and families of the fallen.  I am sure this attack will be studied just like the Wanat attack, and we will be making adjustments if needed.  Or not.  War is a dirty and deadly business, and sometimes stuff like this happens and soldiers die.  I am not going to comment on what they did right or wrong, just emphasize that we must learn from the incident. There are always lessons to be learned.

    But back to the reporting on this. One thing I would like to hear from the MSM one of these days, is how many Taliban we killed in skirmishes like this. I want the Taliban to be sick to their stomaches from all the death of their fellow jihadists, when they read reports like this.  I want them to know, that they just lost a lot of folks because of this attack.  The Taliban are only motivated and empowered, when the MSM reports on this as some kind of tragic loss on our side.        Reportage seems to always emphasize how many we lost, and it never focuses on what was gained in these types of incidents.  We could have killed hundreds in this skirmish, yet I am told to focus on something else.

     Don’t get me wrong though, because every death on the Afghan and Coalition side is tragic. It’s just in a war we should also try to promote what we are doing right, and say ‘hey, that was one hell of a fight boys, good job’.  That is the least we could do, to honor the deaths who fell in that battle.

   The other angle on this one is the defense of a base.  This attack emphasizes the importance of having your defenses well thought out and properly resourced.  Don’t be a marshmallow eater, and take the easy way out on preparing the defense.  If you apply Kaizen to your defense, and continue to spitball ideas on how to repel the various types of attacks out there, then you are in the right. Your defense should be hardened, flexible, random, surprising, and show constant vigilance and strength. Your defense should only enhance your OODA, not hinder it. You must always look at your defense through the eyes of the enemy, and think how you would attack your position. You should also be studying other attacks in that region, and learn all you can from these in order to adjust your own defenses. Lot’s to think about, and this latest attack must be studied over and over in order to gain any lessons learned.-Matt

P.S. – I think Bill over at Long War Journal had a far better treatment of what happened, and has a far better title for the incident: US, Afghan Troops Beat Back Bold Enemy Assault in Eastern Afghanistan

——————————————————————

8 US troops killed in fierce Afghan fighting

By ROBERT H. REID and RAHIM FAIEZ (AP)

October 4, 2009

KABUL — Hundreds of insurgents armed with automatic rifles and rocket-propelled grenades stormed a pair of remote outposts near the Pakistan border, killing eight U.S. soldiers and capturing more than 20 Afghan security troops in the deadliest assault against U.S. forces in more than a year, military officials said Sunday.

The fierce gunbattle, which erupted at dawn Saturday in the Kamdesh district of mountainous Nuristan province and raged throughout the day, is likely to fuel the debate in Washington over the direction of the troubled eight-year war.

It was the heaviest U.S. loss of life in a single battle since July 2008, when nine American soldiers were killed in a raid on an outpost in Wanat in the same province.

(more…)

Funny Stuff: The Bacon Grenade

Filed under: Funny Stuff,Photo — Tags: , , — Matt @ 11:03 AM

Bacon Grenade

Legal News: Senate Bill Would Protect Contractor Whistleblowers

Filed under: Industry Talk,Legal News — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 10:42 AM

“Studies have shown that whistleblowers are the single most important source of information when people are ripping off the government,” Kohn said. “Without this kind of law, people will not come forward to disclose fraud.”

*****

   Very interesting, and if any of our legal eagles would like to chime in about this one, feel free to comment. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Senate bill would protect contractor whistleblowers

By Robert Brodsky

October 2, 2009

The head of the Senate contracting oversight subcommittee introduced legislation on Thursday that would provide whistleblower rights to employees of companies receiving government contracts.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., sponsored the legislation (S. 1745) that would also apply to employees of state and local governments, nonprofits, and other companies receiving grants or other federal reimbursements such as Medicare.

“Whistleblowers are our first line of defense against waste, fraud and abuse,” McCaskill said. “We’ve got to do everything possible to protect them.”

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress