Feral Jundi

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Military News: An Earwitness Account of The Battle at COP Keating

     This was a memo passed on to retired General Barry McCaffery in regards to the recent battle in Nuristan, and Thomas Ricks posted it on his blog over at Foreign Policy.  For me, I read these notes and tried to envision what these guys were up against.  I also read this and tried to understand what the camp defenses were, and how they faired.  From the sound of it, it looks like a lot was riding on Close Air Support (CAS) in the plan. It looked like the enemy knew about how long it took for CAS to show up, and the enemy also knew that if it fought close quarters with us, that CAS could not be used. Pretty basic stuff, when it comes to guerilla warfare type tactics and it sounds like this was the method in this battle.

     Our guys burned up their 7.62 fast, and their Ammo Supply Point was in the hands of the enemy early in the battle.  Not good.  That, and the ANA forces assigned to the COP ran off out of fear.  Not good either. Luckily CAS did show up, and our troops did fight bravely and was able to kill many of the enemy. But luck is nothing to depend upon.

     What gets me on this one, is what would have happened if this assault went down when the weather was crappy?  Which brings me back to my original thought about depending upon CAS in your defensive plan.  If anything, you must have multiple plans that stand the test of the ‘what ifs’.  There should be a plan in place that should account for CAS not being able to show up.

(more…)

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Afghanistan: Paying Off the Taliban?

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:06 AM

“Here we have internationals and Afghans turning a blind eye to the fact that we are paying off the very Taliban that we claim to be fighting,” says an adviser to the Afghan Ministry of Interior. “It becomes a self-sustaining war, a self-licking ice cream.” –How Crime Pays For the Taliban, Time

*****

    I am reading this stuff, and I am trying to keep a balanced view on all of it. Actually I am trying not to get mad as I write this, because this is insanity the more I think about it.  Now I realize that money can grease the skids out there, but when we create an entire industry off of pay-offs to the enemy, someone has to say ‘what the hell are we doing’ and ‘what is the return on investment’?

   Let’s take that a step further.  If we are paying off the enemy, or allowing the practice of paying off the enemy by these NGO’s/PSC’s, then what is the signal to the government in Afghanistan? We continuously point out the corruption in this government, but isn’t what we are allowing to go on with these payoffs, the pot calling the kettle black?

   It’s worse than that.  When we pay off the enemy, we reduce the legitimacy of the government and the police, and we reduce the perceived strength of NATO.  Matter of fact, paying off the enemy makes everyone look weak.  If anything, we should be using these checkpoints as an opportunity to kill more Taliban.  My point is if this kind of industry will bring the Taliban out in the open to man check points and interact with convoy leaders, then we should get a return on investment and track these Taliban to their lairs, and catch or kill some big fish.

   We do the same tactic all the time in law enforcement in order to find drug dealers and we could be doing the same thing with these guys. If the Taliban want to come out and man checkpoints, then we should be taking advantage of this. Matter of fact, this could be a golden opportunity to do some damage. These convoy operations should be used not only for supplies, but as bait in order to kill Taliban.  In my book, that is smart.

   And from what it looks like, wherever we move the routes, the Taliban follow.  So eventually we have to come to grips that the convoys and the contractors that run these things, actually matter in this war.  If I was the Taliban, I would be hitting us equally on every route into and out of Afghanistan. The same goes for Pakistan, and in many ways we are seeing this. It will only get worse, because this is a strategy that pays off in so many ways for the Taliban.

   Now I realize the guys on the ground are in a position in which they have to survive these routes and do all they can to get their convoy from A to B in one piece.  I do not envy them, and convoy work is extremely dangerous.  If they are having to pay off the Taliban to survive, then that is what they feel is the only option they have. I guess NATO and company could care less about protecting these convoys, or backing up these companies when they get in trouble, so these guys are forced to pay off the Taliban.  How pathetic is that? From a strategist point of view, what NATO and company is allowing to happen has far reaching negative effects.

     My question to NATO and company, is when does it stop?  By allowing payoffs and allowing these companies to get massacred out there, you are empowering the Taliban.  They relish these victories, they get paid handsomely, and are able to buy more weapons and kill even more troops.  That is madness, and these payoffs are creating a thriving industry. It reminds of the piracy problems in the GOA, and how insurance companies keep paying them off. pffffft

    Why would the Taliban want to stop, and why would their price for admission go down? They have an awesome deal, and they will just keep going with it, and laughing all the way to the bank. If that is our end goal with the Taliban, then keep it up. If not, then somewhat at the top needs to re-think this problem and find a better solution than this. –Matt

——————————————————————

Taliban Stepping Up Attacks on NATO Supply Convoys

By Tim McGirk

Wednesday, Oct. 07, 2009

To supply nearly 100,000 troops in Afghanistan, the U.S. and its Western allies rely on road convoys with dozens of trucks to carry in everything from jet fuel to frozen pizza. But increasingly these convoys are coming under savage attack by the Taliban. And experts say that if the ambushes get worse, it could impair NATO’s efforts to keep a supply lifeline running to its troops in forts and camps scattered across the mountainous country.

Often, the death of a private security contractor in Afghanistan goes unheralded; after all, they risk their lives for money, not country. Yet the drivers and guards who ride shotgun on the long convoys snaking over the mountains also suffer heavy casualties. Many have died heroically. Figures released to TIME by NATO showed that from June to September, more than 145 truck drivers and guards were killed in attacks on convoys and 123 vehicles were destroyed.

In previous years, the Taliban would scale down their attacks because of winter blizzards, but a NATO logistics officer says the militants now have the capacity to launch ambushes on supply routes year round. The Taliban are also widening the scope of their attacks so that convoys rumbling across two-thirds of the country are now prey to attack, usually by roadside bombs or a well-laid ambush in which rocket-propelled grenades are fired at the lead vehicle, forcing the convoy to a deadly standstill.

(more…)

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Industry Talk: ‘They Are The Unappreciated Patriots’, by T. Christian Miller

 

     This series is just heart wrenching to read, and it certainly cuts to the bone.  Contractors are the unappreciated patriots, and we have certainly sacrificed in this war.  T. Christian Miller has done a fantastic job of showing that sacrifice, and informing the public on what exactly is going on with our injured contractors/patriots.

  He is also showing some courage by actually calling us ‘unappreciated patriots’. To most journalists out there, we are less than human and less than a patriot, and their opinions scream throughout their reportage. I am sure his peers are thumbing their nose at him.

     This particular story is also a reminder about what is at stake when you enter this profession.  Everyone thinks about these types of injuries from time to time, but when you read through this story, you put a picture to the ‘what if’s’ of this job.  That is good though, because it is these gut checks that actually snap folks into the mindset of doing things right.(you would think…) Because if you do get it wrong, you stand to lose a lot….

     Hell, fate has it’s own plan, and you could do everything right and still lose a lot.  That is the job and that is war. Anyhoo, check out the story and at the end of this post, there is a link to a audio slide show of what Grizzly went through. –Matt

—————————————————————–

‘They are the unappreciated patriots’

In Iraq and Afghanistan, contractors like Reggie Lane often face the same dangers as U.S. troops. And make the same terrible sacrifices.

By T. Christian Miller

October 6, 2009

Reporting from Central Point, Ore.

A nurse rocked him awake as pale dawn light crept into the room. “C’mon now, c’mon,” the nurse murmured. “Time to get up.”Reggie Lane was once a hulking man of 260 pounds. Friends called him “Big Dad.” Now, he weighed less than 200 pounds and his brain was severely damaged. He groaned angry, wordless cries.The nurse moved fast. Two bursts of deodorant spray under each useless arm. Then he dressed Lane and used a mechanical arm to hoist him into a wheelchair.He wheeled Big Dad down a hallway and parked the chair in a beige dining room, in front of a picture window. Outside stretched a green valley of pear trees filled with white blossoms.Lane’s head fell forward, his chin buried in his chest. His legs crossed and uncrossed involuntarily. His left index finger was rigid and pointed, as if frozen in permanent accusation.In 2004, Lane was driving a fuel truck in Iraq for a defense contractor when insurgents attacked his convoy with rocket-propelled grenades. For most of the five years since, Lane, now 60, has spent his days in silence — a reminder of the hidden costs of relying on civilian contract workers to support the U.S. war effort. (more…)

Monday, October 5, 2009

Strategy: Ten Steps to Victory in Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Strategy — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 8:45 PM

 Break guerillas’ moral-mental-physical hold over the population, destroy their cohesion, and bring about their collapse via political initiative that demonstrates moral legitimacy and vitality of government and by relentless military operations that emphasize stealth/fast-tempo/fluidity-of-action and cohesion of overall effort.

*If you cannot realize such a political program, you might consider changing sides! -Page 108, Patterns of Conflict, Col. John Boyd

*****

     I liked this op-ed because it was short and sweet.  Each expert gave a quick rundown on what needs to happen, and it was cool to hear them reduce their thoughts on the matter to what is most important.  It is twitter-like in a way.

     With Twitter, you have 140 characters to produce something that is meaningful.  It forces you to really think about what you want to say, because you are limited.  And really, if you know the solution or solutions to the problem, and you have some conviction and passion about it, then it shouldn’t take you that long to communicate it. Less is more, less is more…..

     Either way, check out these strategies, and the rock star strategists attached to these suckers, and let me know what you think. –Matt

——————————————————————-

10 Steps to Victory in Afghanistan

October 4, 2009

Op-Ed Contributors

Reform or Go Home

COUNTERINSURGENCY is only as good as the government it supports. NATO could do everything right — it isn’t — but will still fail unless Afghans trust their government. Without essential reform, merely making the government more efficient or extending its reach will just make things worse.

Only a legitimately elected Afghan president can enact reforms, so at the very least we need to see a genuine run-off election or an emergency national council, called a loya jirga, before winter. Once a legitimate president emerges, we need to see immediate action from him on a publicly announced reform program, developed in consultation with Afghan society and enforced by international monitors. Reforms should include firing human rights abusers and drug traffickers, establishing an independent authority to investigate citizen complaints and requiring officials to live in the districts they are responsible for (fewer than half do).

(more…)

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Military News: U.S, Afghan Troops Beat Back Bold Enemy Assault in Nuristan

   This is the question to ask. Did we kill hundreds of Taliban, or did eight of our own die?  Do you call this a success or a failure?  I mean in wars, people die, and battles often require an investment in blood.  So did we get a return on investment in this battle?  That is what I want to hear about.

   What a fight I tell you, and my heart goes out to the friends and families of the fallen.  I am sure this attack will be studied just like the Wanat attack, and we will be making adjustments if needed.  Or not.  War is a dirty and deadly business, and sometimes stuff like this happens and soldiers die.  I am not going to comment on what they did right or wrong, just emphasize that we must learn from the incident. There are always lessons to be learned.

    But back to the reporting on this. One thing I would like to hear from the MSM one of these days, is how many Taliban we killed in skirmishes like this. I want the Taliban to be sick to their stomaches from all the death of their fellow jihadists, when they read reports like this.  I want them to know, that they just lost a lot of folks because of this attack.  The Taliban are only motivated and empowered, when the MSM reports on this as some kind of tragic loss on our side.        Reportage seems to always emphasize how many we lost, and it never focuses on what was gained in these types of incidents.  We could have killed hundreds in this skirmish, yet I am told to focus on something else.

     Don’t get me wrong though, because every death on the Afghan and Coalition side is tragic. It’s just in a war we should also try to promote what we are doing right, and say ‘hey, that was one hell of a fight boys, good job’.  That is the least we could do, to honor the deaths who fell in that battle.

   The other angle on this one is the defense of a base.  This attack emphasizes the importance of having your defenses well thought out and properly resourced.  Don’t be a marshmallow eater, and take the easy way out on preparing the defense.  If you apply Kaizen to your defense, and continue to spitball ideas on how to repel the various types of attacks out there, then you are in the right. Your defense should be hardened, flexible, random, surprising, and show constant vigilance and strength. Your defense should only enhance your OODA, not hinder it. You must always look at your defense through the eyes of the enemy, and think how you would attack your position. You should also be studying other attacks in that region, and learn all you can from these in order to adjust your own defenses. Lot’s to think about, and this latest attack must be studied over and over in order to gain any lessons learned.-Matt

P.S. – I think Bill over at Long War Journal had a far better treatment of what happened, and has a far better title for the incident: US, Afghan Troops Beat Back Bold Enemy Assault in Eastern Afghanistan

——————————————————————

8 US troops killed in fierce Afghan fighting

By ROBERT H. REID and RAHIM FAIEZ (AP)

October 4, 2009

KABUL — Hundreds of insurgents armed with automatic rifles and rocket-propelled grenades stormed a pair of remote outposts near the Pakistan border, killing eight U.S. soldiers and capturing more than 20 Afghan security troops in the deadliest assault against U.S. forces in more than a year, military officials said Sunday.

The fierce gunbattle, which erupted at dawn Saturday in the Kamdesh district of mountainous Nuristan province and raged throughout the day, is likely to fuel the debate in Washington over the direction of the troubled eight-year war.

It was the heaviest U.S. loss of life in a single battle since July 2008, when nine American soldiers were killed in a raid on an outpost in Wanat in the same province.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress