Feral Jundi

Monday, November 2, 2009

Legal News: Murder Charge Briton Daniel Fitzsimons May Face Psychiatric Tests

   I found this over at PMH and figured I would post it here as well. This story will give the reader a little bit of an inside view on how the Iraqi legal system is working out. –Matt

——————————————————————

Murder charge Briton Daniel Fitzsimons may face psychiatric tests

Sunday 1 November 2009

Lawyers for Daniel Fitzsimons, the British security contractor accused of shooting dead two colleagues in Baghdad, have asked for him to be moved to a psychiatric unit in an attempt to head off a murder trial that could lead to a death sentence.

Fitzsimons, a former paratrooper, was taken to Baghdad’s central criminal court today for a pre-trial hearing in which several witnesses were due to testify that he had been involved in the late night shooting in the city’s international zone in August. But the case was unexpectedly adjourned until 15 November after a lawyer for one of the victims asked for more time to prepare his case.

Several minutes before the trial was due to begin, Fitzsimons met his lawyer, the high-profile Iraqi legal figure Tareq Harb, for the first time. His pre-trial briefing amounted to a five-minute conversation outside the court room and a phone call to his UK-based solicitor, John Tipple.Harb said the court was obliged to agree to his request to move Fitzsimons to a psychiatric unit in Baghdad’s Rashad Hospital, where he will be evaluated by three psychiatrists. He is understood to have been treated in the UK for a psychological condition.

The trial was adjourned until November 15. Before the hearing,Earlier, Judge Saad Dawoud Suleiman, who will preside over the case – the first of its kind since full judicial rights were handed back to Iraqi authorities on 30 June – said Fitzsimons would face a death penalty if convicted.

“This is a very serious case,” he said in his chambers inside the fortified court house on the edge of the international zone. “The death penalty is on the statutes for such a crime.”

An official from the British embassy in Baghdad was at the court, as was a representative from ArmorGroup, which had contracted Fitzsimons to return to Iraq for a third tour as a security contractor several weeks before the alleged incident. An Iraqi guard who was wounded in the alleged attack, in which Briton Paul McGuigan and Australian Darren Hoare were killed, was also present, along with members of his family.

In the hours after the shooting, Fitzsimons signed a statement allegedly confessing to the shootings. But today he told the Guardian he could not remember the night of the shooting and planned to withdraw the confession. “I was under the influence of the drugs they gave me at the time,” he said. “I don’t remember a thing.”

Iraqi investigators say in the hours before the shooting, McGuigan and Hoare had gone to Fitzsimons’s room in the ArmorGroup compound and provoked him. They claim the pair had then sat with Fitzsimons, who had been drinking. Shortly afterwards a violent row allegedly erupted.

The prisoner advocacy group Reprieve is now also lobbying for Fitzsimons, whom and his UK legal team want him extradited to the UKhome to stand trial.

“Reprieve are now formally part of the UK legal team,” said Tipple. “They are playing a proactive role and taking it very seriously.”

Iraq has indicated it will take a tough stance with Fitzsimons, who is the first foreign national to be tried under Iraqi law since the American military withdrew to its bases in June. Senior officials have so far indicated they will not agree to any extradition request.However, Mr Harb said yesterday that the Central Criminal Court is obligated to agree to his request to move Mr Fitzsimons to a psychiatric unit in Baghdad’s Rashad Hospital, where he will be evaluated by three psychiatrists. He is understood to have been treated in the UK for a psychological condition.

Story here.

 

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Industry Talk: Hero Contractor Recalls Deadly U.N. Assault

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 3:21 PM

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Friday, October 30, 2009

Industry Talk: Senator Claire McCaskill–‘Contracting is a Necessity’

 “Contracting is a necessity,” she said. “It doesn’t have to be an evil necessity.”-Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill, former Missouri state auditor and contractor watchdog

*****

     Ok, here is number three folks. A veritable trifecta of shockingly pro contractor statements!! (lightning will soon strike my laptop and burn my fingers–ahhhhhhh)

    To hear Senator Claire McCaskill say that little gem up top, is like hearing that Code Pink was sub-contracted by Triple Canopy for convoy operations in Afghanistan. lol It is refreshing to hear that folks are starting to finally figure out why this industry matters.

   Now to be somewhat critical of the article.  The historical context of contractors needs to go back further, if in fact the author is going to even bring up history in this article.  Contractors have had way more of an impact on this Nation’s history, than just today’s wars or our contributions in the Balkans conflict.  I have continued to bring up that history time and time again, all with the point of providing that context in today’s discussion about this industry. It is wrong not to include that context, and it shows a certain degree of either naivety, laziness or worse yet, journalistic bias.

    That’s ok, because us New Media warriors will certainly fill that void. –Matt

—————————————————————–

New rules due on defense outsources

By: Jen DiMascioOctober 26, 2009 04:54 AM EST

In an Oct. 3, 2007, speech in Iowa City, Iowa, several weeks after Blackwater security guards allegedly shot 17 civilians in an incident in Baghdad, then-presidential candidate Barack Obama made it clear what he thought of the use of contractors to perform essential jobs in Iraq: “We cannot win a fight for hearts and minds when we outsource critical missions to unaccountable contractors.”This week the White House Office of Management and Budget is expected to release a new round of guidelines for contracting that may shed light on when the Pentagon thinks it’s appropriate to go outside the government for contractors and what sort of work the government considers “inherently governmental.”But none of the new OMB guidelines are likely to change the fact that contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan are as much of a fact of life for the Obama administration as they were under President George W. Bush.During the campaign, Obama pledged to reduce the number of battlefield contractors in Iraq — which two years ago numbered 160,000 — and he’s on the way toward meeting that goal. In Iraq, the number of contractors is down to nearly 120,000, but that’s been offset by an increase in the number of contractors in Afghanistan as the war effort grows there. As of June, the last time figures were released, 243,735 contractors were serving across the U.S. military zone known as Central Command.  (more…)

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Afghanistan: U.N. Considering all Possibilities, Including Hiring Private Security Contractors to Protect Staff

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 6:40 PM

The convention does not want to eliminate the use of private companies at all…. -Shaista Shameem (UNWG)

Over a decade ago, Kofi Annan concluded that the world wasn’t ready for privatized peacekeeping. It’s still not. But that shouldn’t mean that we are oblivious to the very important role that many private military and security companies are playing at what I would call the second rank level, freeing up national troops to play key frontline roles. We see these kinds of companies, for example, providing security analysis and training, local private security companies are often key in providing site security and in some cases, convoy support services, and humanitarians operating under a UN security umbrella come into contact with these kinds of companies in a wide variety of theaters and playing a wide variety of functions. -James Cockayne (Researcher and commentator at the International Peace Institute, New York)

   Wow. This is significant. The UN is finally coming to a realistic conclusion, and that is security forces should not be limited to donor nations. This is pretty much a slap in the face to every human rights organization or anti-contractor group out there that has chastised the private military or private security industry.  Even UNWG is probably getting a hundred emails right now about what the Secretary General has just stated.

   Either way, I salute the UN for at least coming to their senses and considering using this industry.  One word of advice though.  The success or failure of using contractors, will depend on how much you are willing to spend, how well the contract is written up, and how well the UN monitors the action.  Please do not be a ‘marshmallow eater‘ and take the easy way out on this stuff. The lives of your staff are in your hands. –Matt

——————————————————————

Secretary-General to Hold High-Level Staff Meeting on Threats to UN Security

By Margaret Besheer

United Nations

29 October 2009

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon will convene a meeting of the organization’s top officials on Friday to discuss the serious security challenges facing the organization in Afghanistan and other parts of the world. Mr. Ban appealed to the members of the Security Council for their support during an emergency session Thursday – a day after an attack on a U.N. guesthouse in Kabul killed five staffers.The U.N. Secretary-General said Friday’s meeting will focus on the growing threat to the United Nations in places across the world where it operates.”Increasingly, the U.N. is being targeted,” said Ban Ki-moon. “In this case, precisely because of our support for the Afghan elections. Not counting peacekeepers, 27 U.N. civilian personnel have lost their lives to violence so far this year – more than half of them in Afghanistan and Pakistan.”

(more…)

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Afghanistan: Three Contractors Killed in Plane Crash

  This kind of missed the news, and adds to the brutal list of air accidents that have happened recently. RIP. –Matt

——————————————————————

3 bodies found in US plane wreckage in Afghanistan

October 27, 2009

KABUL — NATO-led forces have recovered the remains of three American military contractors from the wreckage of a U.S. Army reconnaissance plane that crashed two weeks ago in the rugged mountains of northeastern Afghanistan, the military said Tuesday.

The Army C-12 Huron twin-engine turboprop had been missing since it crashed Oct. 13 while on a routine mission in Nuristan province, a Taliban insurgent stronghold. The plane went down less than two weeks after insurgents overran a coalition outpost the same province, killing eight American troops in one of the war’s deadliest battles for the U.S.

NATO said in a statement that the crash is “under investigation, though hostile action is not believed to be the cause of the crash.”

Thomas Casey, a spokesman for Lockheed Martin Corp., confirmed that the three dead men — a pilot, co-pilot and technician — were American citizens working for Lockheed Martin subcontractors.

They were employed under a Lockheed Martin contract for “counter-narcoterrorism” operations, Casey said.

U.S. forces spokesman Col. Wayne Shanks said the crew were the only ones aboard when the craft went down without giving off any distress signals.

“We just lost contact,” Shanks told The Associated Press.

Nuristan has been the site of the two deadliest battles of the war for U.S. forces, including the Oct. 2 attack in the province’s Kamdesh outpost and a July 2008 raid that killed nine American soldiers at an outpost in Wanat area.

The NATO-led mission is planning to withdraw troops such isolated strongholds to focus on more heavily populated areas as part of a new strategy to protect Afghan civilians.

Shanks said the plane was on a mission for NATO-led forces at the time, but he gave no other details. Casey said only that it was a surveillance mission.

The pilot and co-pilot worked for a company called Avenge Inc., while the technician was employed by a contractor called Sierra Nevada Corp., Casey said.

The military said a UH-60 helicopter traveling to the crash site four days later “experienced a strong downdraft and performed a hard landing” nearby. The helicopter’s crew members were rescued, and the chopper was stripped of sensitive and useable parts and destroyed to keep insurgents from salvaging anything in the wreckage.

Story here.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress