Feral Jundi

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Iraq: Here Comes China And Their ‘Astonishing’ Oil Demand

   China’s demand for oil jumped by an “astonishing” 28% in January compared with the same month a year earlier, the International Energy Agency (IEA) says. 

*****

   Here is a quick run down on what China is doing in Iraq, and it is all about oil.  I find it interesting that China is getting more involved with really risky resource ventures in places like Iraq or the Congo. And what that means to this industry, is that the Chinese will find a way to secure these ventures and investments.  You will either see Chinese security folks, or they will use local nationals for the work.  But like with most security work, they tend to go with the kind of security they can really trust and depend upon for the most sensitive projects.  Especially to guard oil executives.

   The other thing about this that is frustrating, is that information about Chinese private security companies is very thin.  Maybe there is tons of stuff on Chinese servers?.  Who knows, but it is an area that I would like to learn more about as the fight for resources increases in the coming future. Our industry will only see more involvement in that resource war, and it is important to track this stuff.

   In Iraq, you could very well see a situation where you see Chinese security contractors rolling down the highway in SUVs, or posted at some gate of some oil facility. If any readers have any stories about bumping into Chinese military or contractors in Iraq, please feel free to post away in the comments.  Like I said, there is nothing written about Chinese PMC’s or PSC’s, and I would like to see Feral Jundi’s archives fill up with some more data about that.  I will keep looking, and if anyone finds anything else, let me know. Especially for Africa, because China is really involved there. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Chinese guards at the Ahdab field Thaier Al-Sudan/Reuters 

Red Star Over Iraq

January 21, 2010

China’s ambitions in the Iraqi oil fields could change the landscape

By Stanley Reed and Dexter Roberts

It may be the start of the biggest oil job in the world. Each day, 20 workers from BP and China National Petroleum Corp. (CNPC) buckle down to the task of prepping the Rumaila oil field in southern Iraq for rapid development. In industry lingo, Rumaila is a “supergiant”—a 50-mile-long deposit of sweet crude with estimated reserves of 16 billion barrels, whose output may someday rank second only to Saudi Arabia’s vast Ghawar field. The Saudis, though, have carefully managed their oil assets for decades. In contrast, Rumaila, a lightly inhabited expanse of date groves and Bedouin encampments, has not had a proper upgrade since the 1970s. The Iraqis contracted with BP and CNPC last year (BP) to juice Rumaila’s production from 1.06 million barrels a day to 2.85 million, all in seven years. No one has ever tried such a ramp-up at a field as huge as this one. Putting Rumaila back in full working order will take tens of thousands of workers, 1,000 new wells, and billions in investment.

BP is the largest partner in the venture, but only by a dipstick: It has a 38% stake, while the Chinese hold 37% (the rest is owned by an Iraqi company). The media focus has been on BP’s decision to take up the Rumaila challenge for a low fee of only $2 for every barrel the venture produces. But the more important story could be China’s role. “CNPC’s involvement brings together the country with the most rapid growth in energy demand in history with the country that plans the greatest buildup of production capacity ever,” says Alex Munton, an Iraq specialist at Edinburgh-based oil consultants Wood Mackenzie.

(more…)

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Industry Talk: TigerSwan Awarded U.S. DoD Iraq Security Contract

   TigerSwan is doing this the smart way. Getting in with local Iraqi security companies and also providing linguists for projects is the way to go, as we slowly transition out of Iraq.  And this company has all the goods to make this contract work because they are all former CAG guys. So businesses should feel at least somewhat comfortable that they have some competent folks in charge.

     Definitely sign up for their news letter and check their career page every now and then, because I am sure we will see more security related jobs pop up in the future. Especially if Iraq plans on capitalizing on their oil fields and increasing their output big time. –Matt 

—————————————————————-

TigerSwan Awarded US Dept of Defense Iraq Security Contract

APEX, NC

March 2, 2010

TigerSwan announced today it has been awarded the contract for Personal Security Detail Services in support of the Task Force for Business and Stability Operations (TFBSO) in Iraq.The Task Force for Business and Stability Operations (TFBSO) is focused on economic stabilization of Iraq, with foreign direct investment, banking and financial systems, industrial capacity revitalization to corporate development, procurement assistance and budget execution, agriculture revitalization, and communications infrastructure. TFBSO also emphasizes the ability of bi-lateral operations between US and Iraq companies. The TFBSO was established in June 2006 to aid in the revitalization and stabilization of Iraq’s economy and to create jobs for the Iraqi people. Since that time, the organization has deployed more than 400 business leaders, engineers, subject-matter experts and accountants to work in partnership with Iraqi business and engineering professionals in every province of the country.Under terms of the $12 million contract, TigerSwan will provide all resources to support the contract, including an experienced multi-disciplined, project management team to ensure the security and safety of TFBSO personnel and sponsored visitors operating throughout all regions of Iraq; experienced, multi-cultured security personnel; analytical intelligence support; and logistics support to include multiple self-sustaining life support camps.

TigerSwan CEO James Reese praised TFBSO for its success in facilitating business (more…)

Publications: GAO Concludes That Contractors Are More Cost Effective Than Employees!

    Well duh. lol You guys don’t have to pay the pensions of contractors when their contract is done and the war is over. Of course the government loves to use this ‘disposable workforce’ called contractors.

     Thanks to David Isenberg who brought this to everyone’s attention through his blog, and you can read his assessment here.

     I do have an issue with the way GAO reworded the one instance that federal employees were more cost effective.  Why training, vetting and recruiting costs were not included in this last one, is interesting.  Is this because politically speaking, they are wanting to promote phasing out security contractors, and the GAO was pressured to write it that way? So instead of adding 240 million with the 162 million dollars to make the ‘grand total cost’ to the government for federal employee security specialists of 402 million dollars, they instead decided to stick with just the 240 million dollar figure? So in order to support their statement that security was not cost effective, they decided to split up the figure…(raised eyebrow) So with my simple math here, I show that private industry is more cost effective than the government for security work.

   Also, I wonder if legal fees and lawsuits were tacked into the costs, because private industry is definitely eating that bill with this war.  Just ask companies like Xe or DynCorp.  And as more legislation is passed, which allows more people to easily sue private industry, and/or makes it more difficult to sue the government, I think this is another area that needs some attention in the accounting process here. A company has to have it’s own costly legal apparatus. The government has a massive legal apparatus already and oodles of laws to protect itself from litigation.

     Just look at the dismal example of how many ‘few successful’ whistleblower cases there have been against government?  Office of Special Counsel should be changed to the Office of Protect the Government. Not to mention all the lawyers assigned to protect the various agencies and departments out there.  The government has a legal shield around it like you can’t believe, and all of it is funded by the tax payer.

   Overall, this is a good publication to show folks as proof that we are more cost effective and we do make sense to the government. So if you are ever in an argument with some dork about the nuts and bolts of contractor efficiency, just pull this sucker up and let the GAO do your talking. –Matt

——————————————————————-

Warfighter Support: A Cost Comparison of Using State Department Employees versus Contractors for Security Services in Iraq

GAO-10-266R March 4, 2010

Full Report (PDF, 20 pages)

Summary

In Process

Our comparison of likely State Department costs versus contractor costs for four task orders and one contract awarded by the State Department for security services in Iraq showed that for three of the task orders and the contract, the cost of using State Department employees would be greater than using contractors, while the State Department’s estimated cost to use federal employees was less for the other task order. For example, using State Department employees to provide static security for the embassy in Baghdad would have cost the department approximately $858 million for 1 year compared to the approximately $78 million charged by the contractor for the same time period. In contrast, our cost comparison of the task order for providing personal security for State Department employees while in the Baghdad region–which required personnel that have security clearances–showed that for this task order, the State Department’s estimated annual cost would have been about $240 million, whereas the contractor charged approximately $380 million for 1 year. However, because the State Department does not currently have a sufficient number of trained personnel to provide security in Iraq, the department would need to recruit, hire, and train additional employees at an additional cost of $162 million. Contract requirements are a major factor in determining whether contractors or government personnel are less expensive–especially factors such as whether personnel need security clearances. However, there are other factors that may play a role in the decision of whether to perform security services with federal employees or enough federal employees than to acquire contractors. Additionally, the government could potentially be faced with incurring some administrative costs from having to take actions to reduce government personnel if they are no longer needed. When using contractors, the department also incurs administrative costs for awarding the task orders and contract and providing oversight; however, the State Department was unable to estimate these costs. Finally, some costs associated with providing Iraq security services using federal employees–such as developing new career fields, providing additional overhead, and building new housing–are difficult to quantify.

Link to publication here.

Industry Talk: U.S. Government Officials And DynCorp Honor Police Trainers Injured In Iraq

Filed under: Industry Talk,Iraq,Medical — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 12:00 PM

     Bravo to DynCorp and the government folks for honoring these men and their sacrifice. It is the least they could do, and other companies out there who have had injured or deceased contractors should take note.

      I also hope that DynCorp will continue to show it’s appreciation by being there for these men when they need help with medical, mental and pay issues. Handing out awards is one thing, but being there for your people when they need that help is the sign of a truly grateful and compassionate company. You will also attract good contractors who actually want to work for you and do a good job, because they know you care. –Matt

——————————————————————

Left to right: Tate Mallory, Bill Ballhaus of DynCorp International and Ken Leonard 

*****

U.S. Government Officials and DynCorp Honor Police Trainers Injured in Iraq

Mar 04, 2010

Representatives for the Department of Defense, the U.S. Congress, the Department of State, and DynCorp International (DI) gathered on February 17, to honor two former civilian police trainers who received injuries while working in Iraq to help build and strengthen Iraq’s police force.

According to the groups, Kenneth Leonard and Tate Mallory, the two trainers, were honored by a crowd of more than 200 people. Both worked for DI on the International Civilian Police Program (CIVPOL) contract with the U.S. Department of State Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL). In Iraq they were under the Civilian Police Advisory Training Team, the component of the Multinational Security Transition Command responsible for the U.S.-led effort to train and equip the 135,000-member Iraqi police service.

The DynCorp International President’s Valor award was presented to Kenneth Leonard and Tate Mallory by Tony Smeraglinolo, president of DI’s Global Stability and Development Solutions (GSDS) division. The DI President’s Valor Award is the highest recognition given by the company, and has been awarded only 11 other times.

“This award is presented to individuals who have exemplified bravery and heroism in execution of their responsibilities in the most challenging of circumstances,” said Tony Smeraglinolo in his remarks. “These two men have demonstrated not only great bravery but resounding resilience, unequalled commitment to service and are truly great Americans.”

State Department INL Bureau Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary William McGlynn presented certificates of appreciation on behalf of the State Department and spoke of the men’s skills and contributions working in the most difficult of circumstances. The State Department also presented DI Care Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Director Mike Warren with a special certificate of recognition for his work in creating and running a program that assists employees and their families, and his personal commitment to helping each employee and family member who needs him.

(more…)

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Afghanistan: Contractors Under Control In Afghanistan, Says Senator McCaskill

   It’s nice to hear that she is pleased with the job of the folks in Afghanistan.  No word though on if the 600 positions for monitoring contracts have been filled yet, and I am speculating that it has not happened because of the problems going on in Iraq.  Fill the positions, and then get back to us about how well the accounting is going in Afghanistan or Iraq.  Until then, you guys have no one to blame but yourselves if companies are not doing what you want them to do. –Matt

——————————————————————

Contractors under control in Afghanistan, senator says

But Iraq has a way to go to tame its wild west image

By Matthew Weigelt

Feb 16, 2010

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) said today U.S. military forces based in Afghanistan are doing a much better job of tracking contracts and purchases than they did in Iraq.

Military officers and officials from other agencies are coming together regularly to look at their auditing work, McCaskill said. Members of what are considered auditing committees are checking their audits to make sure they were done correctly. The committees are hunting for gaps in auditing oversight, but also avoiding the duplication of each other’s work, she said in a conference call from New Delhi, India.

In Iraq, however, contracting oversight has been essentially nonexistent, McCaskill added.

“It was the wild west,” McCaskill said about what she found on a trip to Iraq in 2007. She said she was unsure military officers realized they had a problem with overseeing their contracts.

Today though, the military has improved slightly regarding audits and contracting oversight, according to McCaskill. The military has structures in place and they are now making an effort to track what they buy and keep account of that equipment, she said.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress