Feral Jundi

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Legal News: The Amendment Of Executive Order 12425 And Giving INTERPOL Immunity?

   This speaks for itself, and it is a shocker to say the least.  This is also causing quite a stir in law enforcement circles and constitutional law circles, as to what this new order actually means. Good or bad, I do not think there was enough debate or discussion about if we should have done this or not. Interesting, and let me know what you guys think. –Matt

——————————————————————

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

December 17, 2009

Executive Order — Amending Executive Order 12425

EXECUTIVE ORDER- – – – – – –

AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,December 16, 2009.

Link here.

 

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

PMC 2.0: Armchair Deputies Patrol U.S. Border

   I posted a deal about this awhile back, and it is cool to finally get some statistics about the program.  I thought it was an awesome idea back then, and I still think it is good idea and deserves further study and use.

   Now some of you are probably wondering why this isn’t under law enforcement or technology?  I put it under PMC 2.0 because I think the lessons learned with this virtual border watch program, could easily be applied to other countries and border security contracts.  Especially countries where border control is a matter of life and death, where terrorists are looking to import their hate.

   Look at the Afghanistan and Pakistan border, or the Iraq borders, or the Saudi Arabia and Yemen border?  Crowd sourcing a border watch program could very well be the trend of future border security operations.  It also involves that Grandma in Michigan, if in fact she wanted to make  a difference in the war effort or with border enforcement here in the US. It is like a modern day version of the coastal lookouts that civilians participated in back during World War Two.

   By the way, these guys should turn this into a mobile application for smart phones, and make this something people can do while waiting in the doctor’s office before an appointment.  That would really increase the numbers if you know what I mean.-Matt

—————————————————————–

Armchair deputies patrol US border

December 26, 2009

By Claire Prentice

When John Spears gets home from his sales job in New York, he sits down at his computer with a bottle of beer and starts patrolling the US border.

And to do it, he does not need to stir from his sofa.

He is one of tens of thousands of people around the world who are volunteering to patrol the 1250-mile long (2000 km) stretch between Texas and Mexico via the web.

The controversial $4m (£2.5m) Texas Virtual Border Watch Programme invites civilians to log on to Blueservo.net.

There they can monitor live feeds 24/7 from 21 hidden surveillance cameras placed at intervals along the border.

Supporters see the initiative as a step forward in US efforts to curb illegal immigration, drug smuggling and border violence.

Critics say it is encouraging vigilantism and stoking anti-immigrant feeling.

Value for money?

(more…)

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Industry Talk: US To Switch Afghan Police Training from DoS CIVPOL, to DoD CNTPO, DynCorp Protests

   This is big news, because there is a lot of money riding on the current set up, and DynCorp was sitting all fat and happy on the CIVPOL contract as the incumbent.  Now that DoD is taking it over and issued a new task order, only companies that are pre-qualified contractors for CNTPO get to participate.  Those companies are Lockheed, NG, Raytheon, Xe, and ARINC.

   The general feeling I am getting about this latest move, is that the DoD wants to have more control over the training of the Afghan police, and give them training that is more military-like.  The reason for this, is so these poor guys can actually survive the war, so they can go on to be effective in their normal police work.

   The Afghan police are already fighting more war, than doing police work, so it makes sense to harden them up a little.  Not too mention that when you have cops teaching Afghan police forces to shoot PKMs or RPGs, then the realm of police work skills gets trumped by war fighting skills.  So yeah, DoD would be a better choice.

   The other one that was interesting, was the hearing at CSPAN about Afghan National Security Forces.  Executives from Dyncorp, MPRI, and Xe all made a showing at this thing, and they all had something unique to say about their little chunk of the war.  Which further emphasizes the CNAS report as to the importance of contractors in the war effort.

   One thing that was mentioned by Xe, which I think is a great suggestion, is to integrate military trainers with Xe trainers, to insure a quality product.  That way, there is no blaming Xe for a poor job, when in fact, there is direct military oversight and integration into the training.  This makes sense for unity of effort, and totally makes sense about getting everyone on board with the strategy of the war.  I say mix that chocolate with the peanut butter! lol

   Probably the best part of military integration with programs like this, is security.  It is big military that has the guns, the air support and the communications necessary to make any enemy’s day, a bad day.  So for these sites that are located up in the hills, where training and security go hand in hand, having some military folks around with the big guns, would be a nice insurance policy for the defense.

   Be sure to check out the thread on this subject at SOCNET, and I look forward to any input from the readership about this. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Afghan National Security Forces Contract Training

Friday, December 18, 2009

The December 18, 2009, hearing of the Commission on Wartime Contracting reviewed the adequacy and oversight of contract training for Afghanistan’s national army, national police, and border police — organizations critical for stability as the United States moves toward its newly stated goal of beginning withdrawal of U.S. forces from the country in July 2011.

At the end of November 2009, Afghan National Army strength was about 96,000; it is expected to grow to 134,000 by the end of October 2010 (40% growth) and is targeted reach 240,000 by 2013 (80% growth). The Afghanistan National Police was near 94,000 and is expected to be almost 97,000 strong by the end of 2009. While there is no programmed end strength set for 2010, the U.S.-led Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan has proposed growing the ANP to 160,000 by 2013 (65% growth).

(more…)

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Mexico: Drug War Update–Tijuana Gets A Tough Guy, Drug Cartels Lose Leyva

    Big news with the drug war down south.  The Mexican Navy kills Beltran Leyva, a major drug boss with a two million dollar bounty on his head.  No word if anyone actually collected on that bounty.

    The other story that grabbed my attention is the new security jefe in Tijuana.  This guy is definitely working on being ‘bad ass of the week’.  I just hope he stays alive long enough to do some damage upon the cartels.

   Finally, I would like to say that if Mexico thinks they are doing all they can to stop these guys, think again.  Mexico could certainly open up the cartel killing market using the Letter of Marque concept, and open up a new front in the drug war.

     Mexico has a bounty system for these cartels already, but in order for it to work properly, they need to bring in companies under that system. Individuals, who have no way of protecting themselves and fear retribution if they turn in a drug boss or his buddies, are not likely to partake in a bounty system. But entire companies will join in, because they have the means to protect itself and usually has the kind of guys who can take care of themselves.

     And if there are hundreds of companies going after cartels, along with the police and military, well then you have a diversified strategy with a total drug war concept. More importantly, they need to give the companies involved with taking on the cartels, legal protections–hence the reason behind the LoM.

    One last thing. Mexico is not a signatory of the Declaration of Paris. And what is really cool about the LoM, is it is warfare on the cheap.  Just the kind of solution a country would need in case they ran out of money do to a protracted war or were in a deep recession because of other factors throughout the world.

     Drug cartels are loaded with loot, they fight to bring over billions of dollars of hard cash into the US in order to launder it, and they buy all sorts of ridiculous things with that money.  Privateers would love to take that wealth away from the cartels as well as kill or capture individuals to collect on the state offered bounties.  Seems pretty logical to me.  Dios mio. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Death of a Mexican drug lord

Mexican forces won this battle, killing Arturo Beltran Leyva. But the war is far from over.

December 19, 2009

Understandably, Mexican President Felipe Calderon is trumpeting the navy’s success in taking down Arturo Beltran Leyva, wanted in the United States and Mexico for his part in the $15-billion to $20-billion-a-year drug trade. He was a criminal known to behead his rivals and believed to be responsible for last year’s killing of the federal police chief in his Mexico City home; he was the most powerful cartel boss to be removed by security forces since Calderon launched his drug war in 2006. The operation reportedly was the result of improved U.S.-Mexican intelligence cooperation, and although the naval troops failed to take Beltran Leyva and six cohorts alive, it should yield a trove of new information. Moreover, the battle between cartel grenades and the navy’s mounted machine guns was carried out without civilian casualties or, apparently, some of the other abuses that have marked army operations.For all the accomplishments, however, the operation reveals the extent of unfinished business in Calderon’s campaign. Beltran Leyva was discovered at a luxury apartment complex near the governor’s mansion in the city of Cuernavaca, just south of the national capital. Clearly he felt he had bought enough protection from security forces to stray far from his home base in Sinaloa and into the weekend getaway for Mexico City’s rich. But someone either infiltrated his inner circle or turned on him — possibly for the $2-million bounty on his head. (more…)

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Law Enforcement: Unease As Security Groups Take Police Roles in the UK

   You guys will get used to it.  This is more indication of governments and law enforcement hemming and hawing about the monopoly on the application of the use of force.  I think there is plenty of room on the stage for private industry and the state to share.

    If anything, I think folks are just worried about competition, and that is what really drives these other conversations about ‘pushing the boundaries’ or whatever. It would be like the US Postal Service freaking out about Fedex or UPS, two private shipping companies who directly compete with the US government services.  There is plenty of work for everyone, and both sides are still in existence. Both sides have their place, and likewise for the private security industry and law enforcement. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Unease as security groups take police roles

By James Boxell

December 14 2009

Private security companies have started “pushing the boundaries” of frontline law enforcement and are becoming involved in highly charged areas such as the policing of protests, the Financial Times has learnt.

G4S, the FTSE 100 security group, has provided mobile custody cells and detention officers at two recent environmental demonstrations. It has also begun to supply full teams of investigators on complex criminal cases, another area that will prove contentious with some chief constables.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress