Feral Jundi

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Afghanistan: Lack of Troops + Lack of Afghan Police and Military + High Security Demand = Using Security Contractors?

   I would like to put this out there that this industry is ready to pounce on whatever the war effort requires.  If you need more security for your civilian surge, then hot damn, the security contracting industry will jump on it and meet your needs.  If you need to secure convoys and guard routes up in the north, then security contractors could totally do that.  If you need to train up thousands of Afghan police and military, then security contractors can totally do that as well.  Whatever the war effort needs, it could be solved by utilizing the free market power of the security contracting industry.  With just one caveat though.

     The government must take responsibility for contracting those services. You must manage these contracts by providing the necessary man power to watch the companies, and you must write smart contracts that give the companies everything they need to accomplish the mission yet still makes it easy to control them.  This is not a difficult concept to understand, and each contract should be treated with the utmost respect and care.  Give the contract what it needs to be successful, by applying quality control measures and some Kaizen. Be like the worried home owner, watching over the building of their house, and the government will do just fine with managing these contracts.

     The deal is that we have been doing these jobs in the war for awhile, and the only reason they have faltered is because of the lack of oversight by the government.  This lack of oversight allows the environment necessary for poor management to happen within the companies.

     And what really kills me is that we have seen an increase of security contractors in Afghanistan this year, so this post is completely relevant to the discussion about what is possible. Once there is good leadership on the government’s part, the companies will fall in line. We have a chance to do this right, but it takes real effort and an application of lessons learned to get it done.  The pay off will be mission accomplishment and victory, and that would be something we could all be proud of and celebrate.   –Matt

——————————————————————

Taliban grab foothold in north

By Jonathan S. Landay

MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS

Monday, Aug. 31 2009

BAGHLAN-I-JADID, Afghanistan — Taliban insurgents have taken over parts of two

northern provinces from which they were driven in 2001, threatening to disrupt

NATO’s new supply route from Central Asia and expand a war that has largely

(more…)

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Logistics: Marines’ Beasts of Burden are Again Leading the Pack

Filed under: Afghanistan,Logistics,Military News — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 9:36 PM

    This was a great story and it got me thinking.  Matter of fact, Tim’s recent post and the challenge posed by Small Wars Journal got me thinking about the infantryman’s load in Afghanistan, and some of the solutions for making that lighter.  Obviously, donkeys are a good choice, and this article tells it all.

   But that also made me think of how far would this concept go in terms of the current conflict?  Would companies be contracted out to lead mule trains up to Combat Outposts and FOB’s?  Would security contractors escort these mule trains as they try to bring them in safely to the destination, much like security contractors in Iraq (and Afghanistan) have been doing with vehicle convoy operations?  With the Marines, we are not talking about a few ODA teams out in the hinterland, we are talking about infantry units that need supplies up in the mountains, and the possibility is there I guess for companies to get involved with that. Or not.

   I guess the thing to think about with this is that how many units will it take to command these pack trains as they go through the mountains?  What would be the percentage of pack trains that would get attacked and the precious cargo destroyed?  So that would leave the idea of having a very involved pack train system, just so that these combat outposts could have somewhat dependable supply deliveries.  Could the military keep up with that, or would there come a point where contractors would have to be brought in?  Interesting stuff and we will see.

     On a side note, these pack trains are great.  In the smokejumpers, we used them all the time to haul gear in and out of the mountains.  Although it seems I still ended up hiking a lot of gear all over the place.  I have also trained up at Pickle Meadows up at Bridgeport, and that is some beautiful country. –Matt

——————————————————————

Marines’ beasts of burden are again leading the pack

For centuries, donkeys and mules have been the preferred mode of military transport in Afghanistan. At a training center in the Sierra Nevada, Marines learn how to handle the sure-footed animals.

By Tony Perry

July 7, 2009

From the Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Bridgeport, Calif. — With 75 pounds of military gear cinched on her furry back, Annie was stubborn the whole way.

The two Marines assigned to her pushed, pulled and sweet-talked her up the steep, twisting trail on the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada.

(more…)

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Logistics: US Army Paid Bonuses to KBR Despite Questions

Filed under: Logistics — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 9:28 AM

    I thought this was telling, and it pretty much defines one of the central issues with contracting in general.  To pay bonuses, despite these issues, shows a complete lack of real accountability or quality control by the government.  Bottom line, and I will use my house analogy, you cannot contract out the building of a home, take a vacation in Mexico, and come back expecting that home will be built perfectly.  You must be involved in the process to insure it is built to your specifications and to code.  Because if you don’t watch over it, of course things will get screwed up.  So why does the government continue to contract out this stuff, and not care about quality control?  Worse yet, how do you not care especially after soldiers have been killed by electrocution in some shower in Iraq or Afghanistan?  Despicable. –Matt

—————————————————————— 

U.S. Army paid bonuses to KBR despite questions

Wed May 20, 2009

By Thomas Ferraro

WASHINGTON, May 20 (Reuters) – The U.S. Army paid “tens of millions of dollars in bonuses” to KBR Inc, its biggest contractor in Iraq, even after it concluded the firm’s electrical work had put U.S. soldiers at risk, according to a source close to a U.S. congressional investigation.

The Senate Democratic Policy Committee plans to hold a hearing on Wednesday to examine KBR’s operations in Iraq, and question why the Army rewarded the Houston-based company.

The panel says KBR has been linked to at least two, and as many as five, electrocution deaths of U.S. soldiers and contractors in Iraq due to “shoddy work.

Investigators believe hundreds of other soldiers may have received electrical shocks, the source added. The Army is investigating.

(more…)

Friday, February 13, 2009

Podcasts: COR Interviews Andy Thompson, Managing Director of Aprodex

Filed under: Logistics,Podcasts — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 1:54 PM

Combat Operator Radio

Andy Thompson- Managing Director of Aprodex

Jake Speaks with Andy Thompson, Managing Director of Aprodex, The Asset Protection Index. www.aprodex.com 

 -Aprodex is a one stop shopping portal for everything you might need to support a contract out there in the world.

-130 countries participate, trying to match the buyer to the seller. 

-Guys can put up profiles and offer services-and there are even jobs posted! 

     They also have a leadership and business section called Aprodex in Focus.  Businesses can promote themselves through this area.  It is a cool area of the website where companies can show the different ways they have used Aprodex.

The final point, and I really like this, is user feedback.  Customers can give recommendations and feedback about a service or product.  Awesome stuff.  –Matt

—————————————————————— 

 Combat Operator Radio Link Here 

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress