Feral Jundi

Friday, April 9, 2010

Government Work: Army To Hire 3,000 Security Guards, CONUS

Filed under: Government Work,Industry Talk,Jobs — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 12:31 AM

   I actually think this is good news for the guards at these facilities, just as long as the pay doesn’t change. You can dress it up any way you want, but as long as you pay peanuts, you will get monkeys for these positions.  What’s worse, is that if the government does hire someone who sucks, it is incredibly difficult to fire them. Trust me on that one, because I saw it time and time again when working for the feds.

   On the plus side, these guys can hopefully participate in federal benefits (TSP, healthcare, education, etc.).  That’s unless the feds hire them on as temporary employees or some other federal classification that allows the government to not hook them up.

   As to the reasons for switching over, who knows.  Congress somehow thinks that waving the federal wand over a project will somehow make it magically run better.  I beg to differ, and I have seen some screwed up agencies and departments in the federal government.  Poor management, poor communications between agencies and departments, and apathy amongst employees who think that the government will never fire them no matter what they do, seem to be the down sides with this.

    The big one is management, and what applies to private industry, applies to the feds as well. And with government, managers tend to protect themselves with loopholes and government rules to do whatever the hell they want.  Employees can use EEO to do some crazy stuff as well.  As best I can describe, if you wanted to do zero work, you could figure out a multitude of loopholes in the system that would help you accomplish that.  The feds are soooo inefficient, it’s not even funny. But hey, whatever floats congress’ boat.

    What comes to mind is the TSA and how they are viewed by the public. Once you join the ‘govy’, you are now ‘the man’ that everyone loves to hate on. lol If you want to apply for this stuff, just follow the links below for USAJobs and type in ‘security guard’ for your part of the country. –Matt

—————————————————————

Army to hire 3,000 security guards

Apr 7, 2010

By IMCOM Public Affairs

SAN ANTONIO, Texas (April 7, 2010) — The Army is converting about 2,500 installation access control point security guard positions from contractor to federal employee status at nearly 50 stateside locations.Overall, Installation Management Command will be announcing 3,076 openings for guards that will be needed at every garrison, except those aligned under Base Realignment and Closure or those transitioning to joint bases where another service is the lead agency.Why is the conversion being made? Congressional mandates and the expected loss of a waiver established after 9/11 that allowed the Department of Defense to contract security guard services at military installations in the States, said Craig Shreiner, branch chief of physical security for IMCOM. (more…)

Friday, November 13, 2009

Afghanistan: How the U.S. Army Protects It’s Trucks–By Paying the Taliban

   First off, bravo to the boys at Four Horseman International for at least taking a stand and not playing the ‘pay-off’s’ game, and fighting your way through the roads. As for NCL Holdings? Pffft.

   One suggestion for the DoD is to use these convoys as opportunities to bring out the enemy and kill him. That, and give the convoys some fire power to deal with the threat. It should be costly for the enemy to attack these convoys.

   We should also be using the pay off scheme to track where the money is going, and then kill the source that way.  Where is the return on investment, when we just hand over money to the enemy for so-called protection services? Either way, there is no way in hell we should be paying off the Taliban or warlords in order to pass through those roads.  The only thing we should be giving the Taliban for passage on those roads, is hot lead.  That is my take on it. –Matt

——————————————————————

How the US army protects its trucks – by paying the Taliban

Insurance, security or extortion? The US is spending millions of dollars in Afghanistan to ensure its supply convoys get through – and it’s the Taliban who profit

Aram Rostom

Friday 13 November 2009

On 29 October 2001, while the Taliban’s rule over Afghanistan was under assault, the regime’s ambassador in Islamabad in neighbouring Pakistan gave a chaotic press conference in front of several dozen reporters sitting on the grass. On the Taliban diplomat’s right sat his interpreter, Ahmad Rateb Popal, a man with an imposing presence. Like the ambassador, Popal wore a black turban, and he had a huge bushy beard. He had a black patch over his right eye socket, a prosthetic left arm and a deformed right hand, the result of injuries from an explosives mishap during an old operation against the Soviets in Kabul.

(more…)

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Logistics: US Army Paid Bonuses to KBR Despite Questions

Filed under: Logistics — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 9:28 AM

    I thought this was telling, and it pretty much defines one of the central issues with contracting in general.  To pay bonuses, despite these issues, shows a complete lack of real accountability or quality control by the government.  Bottom line, and I will use my house analogy, you cannot contract out the building of a home, take a vacation in Mexico, and come back expecting that home will be built perfectly.  You must be involved in the process to insure it is built to your specifications and to code.  Because if you don’t watch over it, of course things will get screwed up.  So why does the government continue to contract out this stuff, and not care about quality control?  Worse yet, how do you not care especially after soldiers have been killed by electrocution in some shower in Iraq or Afghanistan?  Despicable. –Matt

—————————————————————— 

U.S. Army paid bonuses to KBR despite questions

Wed May 20, 2009

By Thomas Ferraro

WASHINGTON, May 20 (Reuters) – The U.S. Army paid “tens of millions of dollars in bonuses” to KBR Inc, its biggest contractor in Iraq, even after it concluded the firm’s electrical work had put U.S. soldiers at risk, according to a source close to a U.S. congressional investigation.

The Senate Democratic Policy Committee plans to hold a hearing on Wednesday to examine KBR’s operations in Iraq, and question why the Army rewarded the Houston-based company.

The panel says KBR has been linked to at least two, and as many as five, electrocution deaths of U.S. soldiers and contractors in Iraq due to “shoddy work.

Investigators believe hundreds of other soldiers may have received electrical shocks, the source added. The Army is investigating.

(more…)

Monday, March 23, 2009

Legal News: Translators File Class Action Suit Against GLS

Filed under: Iraq,Legal News — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 8:48 PM

   This pisses me off.  Translators are such a vital element of this war, and with out them, we would all be lost.  Our lives depend on these folks, and all translators in Iraq have taken huge risks to perform their services.  So why are we playing games like this?  I hope their class action lawsuit tears GLS a new one, because you don’t mess with these folks.  

   On the flip side, all aspects of the contracting community has seen a downward trend in pay scale, but obviously this drop in pay was way over the top.  We’ll see how it turns out. –Matt 

—————————————————————— 

Mother Jones

Military Translators at War

By Bruce Falconer | Mon March 23, 2009 7:48 AM PST

    The more than 2,000 Arab Americans currently working for the US military as contract linguists in Iraq are marked for death. Insurgents view them as traitors and, since 2003, at least 300 have been killed on the job. On the streets of Iraq, many don masks to shield their faces from hostile eyes. Their work is difficult and exhausting, but pays well—more than $200,000 a year for the most skilled positions. Or at least it did. Now some of these translators, who have seen their pay abruptly slashed by as much as 40 percent, are at war with Global Linguist Solutions (GLS), the government contractor that manages a $4.6 billion contract to provide interpreters for the US Army on behalf of an array of smaller subcontractors. The outcome of this fight could affect the US mission in Iraq.

(more…)

Powered by WordPress