Feral Jundi

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Paracargo: Gates Rules Out Airdropping Aid For Fear Of Riots–What?

Filed under: Haiti,Paracargo — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 6:54 AM

   I disagree with this wholeheartedly, and I think this was the wrong decision.  We could have airdropped tools, food, water, and medical supplies in small bundles, evenly distributed throughout the city, and we could have saved lives.  It is so typical for the government to make these kinds of calls, without thoroughly thinking this through. This is not a food drop in the Sudan, where people fight over that food, this is about initial attack on an incident and empowering people to save others.

    We should be focusing on giving the Haitians the means to help themselves in the beginning days of the disaster, so that at least they can do something to even the odds of survival.  We cannot and should not tell the Haitians to stop and lay down, just so we can load up all of our fancy gear and specialists, so we can come to the rescue.  Government needs to empower people to save themselves in this case, and I believe more innocents will have died because of this terrible decision.

   By now, we have witnessed the pictures and videos of Haitians clawing at the rubble with their bare hands in order to save people.  You would hear them screaming for hacksaws, shovels, picks, crowbars, and just the basic necessities to help in the rescue of their friends and family.  It is heart breaking that we have taken this position on airdrops within these first few days of the disaster.  Especially when the capability is there in the West, with Fire Caches filled with paracargo chutes, and tools/food/water bladders/medical supplies and smokejumper loadmasters and pilots that do small scale paracargo operations every summer. Did I mention the fire season is over right now, and smokejumpers could be utilized for this crisis? Matter of fact, smokejumpers drop tons of equipment in the form of small bundles, all over the west during the fire season. To do so in Haiti would not have been a problem. They could have also dropped smokejumpers as an initial attack management team for the disaster, and to secure the drop zones so they can keep folks out.  This is not a new concept, or impossible.  We respond to disasters every summer.

   Not to mention the paracargo capabilities of the Air Force and Air National Guard.  Even Blackwater has been contracted for paracargo drops in Afghanistan, and they could have been called up for this. RAM and SOAR is an NGO that could have gotten involved with dropping medical personnel and supplies.

   Now I do agree that if folks are in complete starvation mode, and desperate for food and water, then people might riot over those drops.  But I am talking about the initial attack, or the first three days of the disaster.  That is when people are either in shock, or they are screaming for a way to rescue their friends and family.  Rioting over air drops would not happen in this case, and especially if the drops were done properly.  And I will argue that if you keep the bundles small, and strategically drop them with smaller aircraft, you can totally alleviate the concerns of possible rioting.

   The beautiful part about small scale paracargo, is that you can kick bundles out of most any kind of aircraft. And all you need is a hard point in the aircraft to attach to in order to deploy the chute on the bundle. You also need loadmasters and pilots that are familiar with the process, and the bundles need to be prepared by competent folks.

   I also want to mention that the chutes of paracargo bundles, could be used as blankets, or tarps to provide shade or rain protection for people. They are instant shelters. The para-chord on each chute can also be used for lashing things or helping in the rescue effort. Each box should have gloves, food, water, and medical supplies, along with tools.  Because in order to sustain rescue, you need energy, you need gloves to protect your hands, and you need water to stay hydrated.  Those items will increase the work output of the rescuers.

    Like I said, this could have all been done in the beginning with an aggressive initial attack, and more lives could have been saved. A Berlin Airlift style assault is what was needed, in order to empower the people of Haiti to save themselves. That is my opinion on the whole matter. –Matt

Edit: 01/18/2010- And finally the Air Force has decided to do air drops into secured drop zones.  Duh.

—————————————————————–

Paracargo

Gates rules out airdropping aid for fear of riots

By Jeff Schogol, Stars and StripesMideast edition, Saturday,

January 16, 2010

ARLINGTON, Va. — Top defense officials have ruled out airdropping food, water and medical supplies over Haiti, fearing that chaos would be the unintended result.

“It seems to me that without having any structure on the ground, in terms of distribution, that an airdrop is simply going to lead to riots as people try and go after that stuff,” said Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Friday.

On Thursday, an Air Force official said that a lack of fuel and equipment was slowing air operations at the Port-au-Prince airport.

(more…)

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Podcasts: NPR-Behind The Business Plan of Pirates Inc.

Filed under: Kidnap And Ransom,Paracargo,Podcasts — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 7:58 PM

     I posted the initial story awhile back under ‘paracargo’, with a photo of some cash being dropped to a boat to pay off the pirates.  That part was fascinating to me, but this part of the operation is equally fascinating.  Matter of fact, the whole thing should be a case study at some maritime institute for modern day piracy and kidnap and ransom negotiations on the high seas.  –Matt

—————————————————————–

Podcast Here

—————————————————————–  

paracargo

David B. Hudson/U.S. Navy/AP

A container is parachuted to a ship being held by Somali pirates on Jan. 9. It’s believed the container held ransom money for the ship and its crew — the usual way pirates collect “pay” for their “work” in the piracy business model. 

Behind The Business Plan Of Pirates Inc.

by Chana Joffe-Walt

All Things Considered, April 30, 2009 · 

Piracy off the coast of Somalia has become an international problem — and an international business. Navy SEALS rescued an American merchant captain earlier this month after Somali pirates raided the Maersk Alabama as it was making its way around the Horn of Africa to deliver aid.

But the issues of criminality and the potential for violence aside, a closer look at the “business model” of piracy reveals that the plan makes economic sense.

(more…)

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Afghanistan: Life at Combat Outpost Keating

Filed under: Afghanistan,Paracargo — Tags: , , — Matt @ 3:50 PM

    This is a story that kind of piggybacks the other one below, as to the kind of issues we are seeing with combat outposts in Afghanistan.  With the support and security of these outposts, are the troops getting enough face time with the local populations?  Perhaps if they were freed up to actually get out more, as opposed to dedicating troops for static security functions or support functions, then we could see more efficiency in these operations.  

   As for resupply, this is interesting.  In the smokejumpers, we lived on paracargo for our fire operations.  Helicopters were used as well, when we needed something bigger flown in, or when we needed to fly firefighters out.  The final analysis of both the fixed wing aircraft dropping paracargo and jumpers and the helicopter, is that fixed wing operations were cheaper to operate.  But ideally, you would have roads that were open and secure to provide that re-supply.  In Afghanistan, supply via road is a tough one and not that feasible.

   Another angle for re-supply is to buy locally.  At the camps I worked at in Iraq, we not only ate MRE’s and A rations, but we also bought locally to add some fresh vegetables or meat to our diets.  The farmers and local merchants were happy too, because they were making money locally. We should be doing more of this at these outposts in Afghanistan, if they are not doing it already.

   The location of these outposts are important as well, and it would be curious to hear the thought process of the original engineers and commanders, on why they picked that spot for Combat Outpost Keating.  And it would be interesting to ask them the question ‘ if they could do it differently, what would they do?’  For our industry, I would also like to hear the thoughts of the commander at this outpost what could be contracted out and what services are needed to help him and his troops do their job.  The point being, is that if there is any way we can make their job a little easier, then why not explore those possibilities?  It sounds like they hired local Afghani cooks for the outpost, so obviously there is some contracted services there.

   This outpost is interesting, because if there are thousands of more troops coming into Afghanistan in the near future, then where are they going to post them at?  They must be thinking about creating more outposts like this one.  And if we want to get that ’25 soldiers to every 1000 civilians’ for optimum COIN operations, could contractors play a vital role in making that happen?  

   The things I could see being contracted out are purely defensive(static security at the outpost) or support(cooks, mechanics, camp manager, bridge and road engineers, etc.) roles, all with the idea of freeing up the troops to do what they need to do in the villages.  I could also see the paracargo or helicopter operations being contracted out as well. We are seeing some use of contractors for these types of services already in Afghanistan, but it could easily be ramped up more to meet the needs of the oncoming troops this spring and summer.  Blackwater already performs troop transport and paracargo operations with their CASA 212’s.  Base security is already beginning to be contracted out, as well as convoy protection services.  I see more of the same picking up in the future, and private industry will definitely answer the call.  The question I have, is if the DoD and DoS plan on contracting this stuff out, are they ready to manage it?  Or better yet, are they doing what is necessary to prepare for it? –Matt

——————————————————————-  

Few comforts, much danger for outpost GIs

Thursday, January 15, 2009 

Jason Motlagh 

COMBAT OUTPOST KEATING, Afghanistan — | Entombed by steep faces of jagged rock, this coalition outpost deep in the Afghan borderlands plays a role as grim as it looks: drawing the attention of insurgents flocking from tribal areas in nearby Pakistan.   The machine-gun, mortar and rocket-propelled-grenade (RPG) fire usually subsides in the winter, when the insurgents go home. These days, however, local militants stoke the fight. They find refuge in caves and villages whose fiercely independent residents say the presence of U.S.-led forces is the root of the problem. “Right now, we´re like the ring of a boxing ring,” said Army Capt. Daniel Pecha, who took over command of Combat Outpost Keating after his predecessor was killed in late October.

(more…)

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Paracargo: $3 Million Paracargo Drop for Saudi Tanker, Somalia

Filed under: Maritime Security,Paracargo,Somalia — Tags: , , — Matt @ 2:28 AM

   This is the first time I have ever heard of paying off pirates by using the paracargo method.  I imagine the chute was a guided system so it landed where they wanted it to go.  What a dramatic finish to the world’s biggest ship hijacking, and this one is for the books.  Then the clown shoe pirates sank in their get away boat, and lost their loot to Davy Jones.  You can’t make this stuff up, and thanks to Doug for sending me this. –Matt

——————————————————————-

paracargo loot

The apparent ransom payment is delivered via a parachuted container to pirates holding the Sirius Star.

 

Pictured: The moment a $3million ransom was parachuted to Somali pirates

By David Gardner

Last updated at 11:53 PM on 09th January 2009

This is the dramatic moment a ransom of $3million was paid to Somali pirates to end the world’s biggest ship hijacking.

The canister full of cash was parachuted onto the Sirius Star – observed by the U.S. Navy who provided these images – and the two-month ordeal of the 25 crew, including two Britons, was finally over.

However things went badly wrong for the pirates soon after the drop – they squabbled over how to split the money and then a wave washed off their getaway boat and drowned five of them.

(more…)

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Paracargo: The C-23 Sherpa

Filed under: Paracargo — Tags: , , — Matt @ 11:17 PM

     Ahhhh, this video of the CASA 212 below reminded me of my smokejumper days.  We used the same aircraft for smokejumper operations, and they are a good aircraft for parachuting and paracargo work.  We would dump out paracargo at about 450 to 500 AGL, depending on terrain and weather conditions.  Our pilots were awesome at getting bundles onto mountain top ridges, or little meadows.  

     I also got to assist in kicking cargo as a jumper.  There is a lot involved with these types of operations, and we definitely took it seriously.  If you get a bundle that does not deploy because of a poorly packed cargo chute, or it hangs up in the door and tears apart the tail of the aircraft, then you could be in a world of hurt.  As a jumper, a big portion of my work during the off season was dedicated to repairing cargo chutes, or packing them.  

     The other aspect of paracargo that doesn’t get much mention is climbing trees for the stuff.  You haven’t lived until you had to climb a 200 ft fir tree rocking back and forth in the wind, just to retrieve cargo or retrieve your parachute after a tree landing.  In the aircraft, we would drop tree climbing equipment for such missions.

     One thing I am surprised at, is why the military doesn’t use it’s fleet of C-23 Sherpas for these kinds of operations?  They are just a little bit bigger than CASA 212’s, and you can get a ramp kit for them, so you can kick out cargo out of the tail. I called them flying ‘Winnebagos’ because of their box-like appearance. I think the military uses them to haul around jet engines or something.

     In the jumpers we used a bunch of different aircraft to include the Dornier 228 202, Douglas DC-3, and the DH-600 series Twin Otter.  The Twin Otter was probably the best all around aircraft for smokejumper operations.  Although jumping out of that DC-3 is cool too.  The DC-3’s we used were the same ones used during WW2.  Obviously the newer ones are highly upgraded, but it is literally the same aircraft, because the airlogs on most of these craft go back that far!  It is a solid aircraft and truly an honor to jump out of it. –Head Jundi

——————————————————————

CA 23 

An air to air right side view of a 10th Military Airlift Squadron C-23A Sherpa aircraft. In the background is a castle. 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress