Feral Jundi

Monday, February 15, 2010

Maritime Security: Defending Ships From Pirates ‘Slightly Smacks Of Vigilantism’, What?

     Small, fast boats with a handful of armed mariners are an “emerging way to handle the [piracy] problem in a safe way,” said Jim Jorrie, CEO of Espada Logistics and Security-MENA, a San Antonio-based company offering such services.

     But shipping industry experts frown on the practice.

     “It slightly smacks of vigilantism to me,” said Tony Mason, secretary general of the International Chamber of Shipping and International Shipping Federation. 

*****

   Yet again, who the hell does this Tony Mason dude think he is? This kind of leadership and commentary, is exactly what has made the piracy problem flourish in the first place. Where is the mention of the right to self defense?  Or does Tony not care about this basic human right on the high seas? This attitude just kills me, and it is guys like this that keep promoting it.

   If a company wants to protect it’s boat and people from armed pirates, then they should have every right in the world to do so.  If they want to put armed guys on a boat, or hire out the Yemeni Coast Guard to protect their goods and people, then so be it.

   And where does Mason get off on calling this Vigilantism?  What a terrible choice of words, and it is this attitude that got the shipping industry into the trouble it is in today.  You have pirates who are applying a business model that works, and is only empowering them to do more, and you have a shipping industry that would much rather roll the dice with pirates, or just pay the ransom.  It is this attitude of ‘non-action’, which is allowing this vile practice of piracy to flourish. Pffft. I call arming the boats self-defense, and certainly the right of all companies that care about the lives of their people.

   The other point that I wanted to mention, is the Yemeni Coast Guard and the Tanzanian Navy both being hired by shipping corporations, is pretty wild.  Talk about pre-Westphalia. lol –Matt

——————————————————————

Hired guns secure ships, stir controversy

By Sandra Jontz, Stars and StripesEuropean edition, Monday, February 15, 2010

NAPLES, Italy — As the world struggles to stop piracy in the waters off the coast of Africa and the Middle East, several companies have stepped forward to provide armed escort boats for commercial ships.

Small, fast boats with a handful of armed mariners are an “emerging way to handle the [piracy] problem in a safe way,” said Jim Jorrie, CEO of Espada Logistics and Security-MENA, a San Antonio-based company offering such services.

But shipping industry experts frown on the practice.

“It slightly smacks of vigilantism to me,” said Tony Mason, secretary general of the International Chamber of Shipping and International Shipping Federation.

“It poses a lot of questions, like under what rules of engagement will they operate?” Mason asked. “We would not speak against [companies] that choose to embark security teams, but as an industry, we are opposed to private forces on ships. They are unregulated and present potential legal problems. We oppose private escort boats for the same reasons.”

Legal issues could arise, he said, if anyone were killed during one of the escort boat’s operations.

“There are laws against a private individual killing a private individual, even if they are perceived to be pirates,” Mason said. “You can’t go on the high seas, just like you can’t go on the streets of London, and shoot people likely to do harm to you.”

Another company offering the services, Muse Professional Group Inc., headquartered in Ukraine, contracts out the services of the Yemeni coast guard to both provide merchant vessels escort as they transit the Gulf of Aden, and quell dissent among the industry leaders, said one of Muse’s owners, Charles Kuneff.

The Yemeni coast guard members are trained by the U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard and must abide by military rules of engagement, said Lt. Col. Bakill Hamzah, operations officer for the Aden District of the Yemeni coast guard, and manager of the country’s National Anti-Piracy Center.

“This is not a normal thing for us,” he said of hiring out guardsmen to commercial companies, Hamzah said. “But it’s one of the solutions we see appropriate … to counter the piracy problem in the area. It looks like a good solution.”

Yemen trained 150 coast guard sailors last year to provide embarked and escort security teams to merchant ships, and plans to train another 150 this year, he said.

Muse’s practice of relying on a military force rather than private security does allay some of the industry’s concerns, Mason said.

Muse charges private companies $25,000 for escort through the Gulf of Aden.

The Texas-based Espada recently bought more small boats to expand its services, and charges $54,000 for a three-day escort through the Gulf of Aden, and $74,000 for wider-ranging, four-day protection that covers East Africa and the Horn of Africa down to the Seychelles or Mombasa, Kenya.

Citing security reasons, officials with the security firms declined to provide Stars and Stripes the names of shipping companies that had hired them. The security firms said they contacted the shipping companies, who declined to be interviewed for this story.

Mason admits that industry experts have yet to find a “good solution” to the swell of pirate attacks despite an increased presence of military naval vessels in the region. The attacks have prompted commercial freighters to look for ways to protect their cargo.

The number of sea attacks worldwide increased 39 percent last year to 406 cases, the highest in six years, according to the International Chamber of Commerce International Maritime Bureau’s Piracy Reporting Centre. The numbers have steadily increased over the past several years, from 239 incidents in 2006 to 263 incidents in 2007 and 293 incidents in 2008, the organization reported.

Nearly 20 percent of global shipping, including 8 percent of global oil shipments, transit the narrow Gulf of Aden that leads through the Red Sea to the Suez Canal. The Gulf of Aden is flanked by volatile Somalia on one side and unstable Yemen on the other. For several years, the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard have trained the Yemeni coast guard sailors to protect their shoreline — training the Yemeni government is parlaying into additional revenue by allowing the coast guard to hire out its cargo ship protection services.

Every year, more than 23,000 ships carrying billions of dollars in cargo pass through the gulf, dubbed “pirate alley.”

Until recently, commercial ships had relied primarily on a handful of international navies for safe passage; a military coalition facing the daunting task of monitoring more than 1.1 million square miles of water.

“The military has had significant successes in the Gulf,” Mason said. “The problem is, pirates migrated to the Somali basin, a far bigger area and much more difficult to patrol.”

In November 2008, for example, pirates in a skiff brazenly attacked a supertanker 450 miles of the coast of Kenya: an unparalleled attack on such a large vessel sailing so far from land.

Military forces haven’t fully endorsed the practice of security-for-hire firms, but have conceded the need for increased measures.

“While the use of commercial security vessels is a newer trend, the Navy applauds the shipping industry’s continued dedication to increase their safety, as long as they adhere to professional standards and the appropriate legal guidelines,” said Lt. Matt Allen, a spokesman with U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/5th Fleet, headquartered in Bahrain.

Countermeasures, including private security firms, might increase the chances of a merchant ship safely navigating the pirate-infested waters, but another regional expert questioned whether such measures will only create different problems.

“The question becomes ‘who, ultimately, is in charge?’ ” asked Roger Middleton, a Horn of Africa expert with the Royal Institute of International Affairs Chatham House think tank in London. “Is it the master of the ships, who is in charge of the safety of the crew, or the hired security team, whose goal might be different?”

Will the private companies’ tactics be in line with those of the patrolling militaries? To whom will the mercenaries answer, Middleton wondered.

“Private companies, in general, have not always held the most reliable record in some parts of the world,” he said.

But Jorrie said the rules of engagement and “order of battle” are clearly defined and established with each client. And most of the security personnel are former military, some special forces, trained in such skills as navigation and radio communications, security and basic maritime skills, Jorrie said.

And his security teams share any incidents and intelligence with the military leaders in the region, though they are not required to do so.

Story here.

 

5 Comments

  1. What they fail to mention, is even though , yes, the US Goverment does fund the YCG, its just not enough. This is where we come into play, and help kill two birds with one stone, we fund and help train the YCG and two help in the fight against Piracy.

    Charles Kuneff

    Comment by charles kuneff — Monday, February 15, 2010 @ 6:52 PM

  2. I am astonished at some of these learned mens' comments, Matt. At least now we know that they aren't really serious about stopping the problem. Somehow, I have always suspected that. But the implications go much further given the link between the pirates and Al-Shabab. Basically, the status quo must be maintained to ensure Al-Shabab can continue…Huh?

    Rgds,

    Eeben

    Comment by Eeben Barlow — Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 3:29 AM

  3. Charles,

    Thanks for commenting about this article, and filling in the blanks. I would be curious to hear any latest information you might have on the combination of piracy and jihadists? I have posted a few articles about the subject, but seeing how you are actually working with Yemeni coast guard folks, maybe you can give us an update on what you know? I have been speculating that jihadists will take advantage of the modern piracy business model that we see being used, just because they can be good investments to fund war.

    Worse yet, if they don't get the ransom they want, they can also use the captured ships as weapons, or just sink them with the crew on board as an act of terrorism and maybe clog a major waterway in the process. Take care. -matt

    Comment by headjundi — Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 5:07 AM

  4. Eeben,

    Absolutely. The thought of jihadists and their involvement in piracy or acts of terror on the high seas, is something that continues to weigh heavy on my mind when I think about this stuff. It is the ultimate combination of business and terror, and it is a no-brainer path for jihadists to follow. And because the shipping industry is such a soft target right now, and easy money, they are only helping to light the path for these jihadists. -matt

    Comment by headjundi — Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 5:14 AM

  5. Please contact me via skype @ musecharles I will do my best to help what we know of the area

    charles kuneff

    Comment by charles kuneff — Saturday, February 20, 2010 @ 5:33 AM

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress