Feral Jundi

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Pakistan: U.S. Embassy Security and The Continued Backstabbing By Pakistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Pakistan — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 11:09 AM

U.S. Embassy spokesman Rick Snelsire said the U.S. contract with Inter-Risk to provide security at the embassy and consulates took effect this year. It is believed to be the first U.S. contract for the firm, said Snelsire, who did not have a figure for its amount.

“Our understanding is they obtained licenses with whatever they brought into the country to meet the contractual needs,” he said. “We told the government that we had a contract with Inter-Risk.”

Akram said he had no idea about any U.S. links to Inter-Risk.

*****

    Oh really?  Akram, or the police chief, had no clue about this contract?  So you are saying that the government, intelligence services, police and your hyperactive media and blogosphere had ‘no idea’ that the US was contracted with Inter-Risk to provide security at the embassy?  Pffft.  I sincerely doubt that claim Mr Akram, and this stinks.  This smells of politics and more of the same Pakistani back stabbing crap that we have all become so used too. Are you folks not aware of the fact that your country is at war, and in your backyard is a ‘rabid pit bull’ that has killed and continues to kill in your country and in Afghanistan?  Wake up and smell the tea.

    Bottom line, we have given billions of dollars to Pakistan in this war, and Pakistan could care less about our security there.  We have an embassy there, and because there is an active war going on in Pakistan, our folks require security.  That is a basic fundamental right of any human being on this planet, and yet this is how we are treated?

   I look at these latest actions against the Pakistani owned security company called Inter-risk, and the views of a few in regards to the embassy, and it pisses me off.  Pakistan takes our money to fight this war against extremists, and for the most part, funnels that money into military hardware to defend against India.  Yet this is how you treat us? And Inter-risk is Pakistani owned, so our money is going into the pockets of a Pakistani for the security of our embassy there? Talk about a slap in the face?

   Furthermore, Pakistan is not doing enough to eliminate the Taliban and Islamic extremists in their country. That is painfully obvious, regardless of what anyone thinks about the latest actions in the Swat Valley.  The Taliban and company are much stronger elsewhere.  I posted that photo below, because to me, that symbolizes the complete worthlessness of Pakistan in this war. I would say that our blood loss in Afghanistan is another prime example of Pakistan’s pathetic action in this war.

     The enemy is in your backyard, and you are just allowing him to hang out. Meanwhile, that enemy is killing our troops and Afghan civilians, selling opium to fund their war and extorting  villages for security–Mafioso style, all with the idea of spreading some twisted and archaic version of Islam throughout the region. And why do we continue to give Pakistan all this money? Oh, that’s right, Pakistan has nukes……(shaking my head)   –Matt

————————————————

Taliban and a Hummer

Taliban Posing with a Captured Humvee in Pakistan. 

Pakistan police raid US-contracted security firm

By MUNIR AHMAD and NAHAL TOOSI

ISLAMABAD — Pakistani police raided a local security firm that helps protect the U.S. Embassy on Saturday, seizing dozens of allegedly unlicensed weapons at a time when unusually intense media scrutiny of America’s use of private contractors has deepened anti-U.S. sentiment.

Two employees of the Inter-Risk company were arrested during the raids in Islamabad, police official Rana Akram said. Reporters were shown the seized weapons — 61 assault rifles and nine pistols. Akram said police were seeking the firm’s owner.

U.S. Embassy spokesman Rick Snelsire said the U.S. contract with Inter-Risk to provide security at the embassy and consulates took effect this year. It is believed to be the first U.S. contract for the firm, said Snelsire, who did not have a figure for its amount.

“Our understanding is they obtained licenses with whatever they brought into the country to meet the contractual needs,” he said. “We told the government that we had a contract with Inter-Risk.”

Akram said he had no idea about any U.S. links to Inter-Risk. A man who answered the phone number listed for the company and identified himself as Riaz Hussain confirmed the raid but gave contradictory answers when asked about any U.S. ties.

The company popped up Friday in one of a slew of local media reports that have focused on private security firms American diplomats are believed to use in Pakistan.

In particular, Pakistani reporters, anti-U.S. bloggers and others have suggested the U.S. is using the American firm formerly known as Blackwater — a claim that chills many Pakistanis because of the company’s alleged involvement in killings of Iraqi civilians.

The U.S. Embassy denies it uses Blackwater — now known as Xe Services — in Pakistan.

Scandals involving U.S. private contractors have occurred elsewhere in the region.

In Washington on Friday, the Commission on Wartime Contracting heard testimony about another contractor — ArmorGroup North America — involving alleged illegal and immoral conduct by its guards at the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan.

Earlier this year, the Iraqi government refused to grant Xe Services an operating license amid continued outrage over a 2007 lethal firefight involving some of its employees in Baghdad, although the State Department has temporarily extended a contract with a Xe subsidiary to protect U.S. diplomats in Iraq.

Many of the reports in Pakistan have been prompted by U.S. plans to expand its embassy space and staff. Among the other rumors the U.S. denies: that 1,000 U.S. Marines will land in the capital, and that Americans will set up a Guantanamo-style prison.

The U.S. says it needs to add hundreds more staff to allow it to disburse billions of dollars in additional humanitarian and economic aid to Pakistan. The goal is to improve education and other areas, lessening the allure of extremism.

Some analysts say Islamist and other opposition groups may be planting the stories in the Pakistani press and blogs to portray Pakistan’s government as an American lackey.

Pakistani political analyst Talat Masood said Inter-Risk’s association with America “will increase the apprehensions that existed that the Americans are engaged in clandestine activities,” and that the raid shows “the Pakistan government is asserting itself.”

The U.S. considers stability in Pakistan critical to helping the faltering war effort in neighboring Afghanistan, and has pressed Pakistan to crack down on extremism on its soil. Al-Qaida and Taliban fighters are believed to use Pakistan’s northwestern regions bordering Afghanistan as hide-outs from which to plan attacks on Western troops in Afghanistan.

Pakistan has launched offensives against militants, but has also relied on some local militias to help fend off the Pakistani Taliban. Some of these militias share the same aims as the Taliban in Afghanistan, but disagree with targeting the Pakistani government.

On Saturday, one pro-government militia leader said the army had asked him to stop fighting the Pakistani Taliban. Turkistan Bhitani told The Associated Press that he and 24 aides surrendered their weapons to the army in the northwestern city of Dera Ismail Khan and that he had asked 350 of his men to do so as well.

Pakistani army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, however, said he knew nothing of such an arrangement.

Also Saturday, a bomb at a security checkpoint in the northwestern region of Dara Adam Khel killed at least two people, local government official Aslam Khan said. He said police are still investigating if it was a suicide attack and determining the identity of the victims.

Taliban fighters in Pakistan’s northwestern regions bordering Afghanistan frequently target security checkpoints. The Sunni extremist militants also have fueled violence pitting Muslim sects against each another.

Police said Saturday that the death toll from a suicide car bombing at a hotel in a Shiite Muslim-dominated village in Pakistan’s northwest rose to 40. The Friday blast in Usterzai village was followed by a bomb in nearby Cho village that killed a Sunni official.

The army said in a statement that 51 militants had surrendered in the last 24 hours in the northwest Swat Valley, and that another seven were arrested during ongoing operations there. It also said militants fatally shot five civilians in a minibus there.

Story here.

 

5 Comments

  1. I wonder if the billions that we are pouring into Pakistan and Afghanistan to stop the Taliban wouldn't be better used in simply keeping them out of our country. I know that is isolationist in a way but this is reminding me of Vietnam where the people didn't really want us there as a whole and the North Vietnamese finally won as soon as we pulled out. If that is the case lets get out of there now. Has anyone besides the Afghans ever won a war in their country?

    Comment by Charlie Bell — Monday, September 21, 2009 @ 6:20 AM

  2. Hey Charlie, good points. The two reasons to stay and fight this to the end, is that this enemy has attacked the US on it’s soil and the enemy is occupying a country with tactical nukes. (Pakistan)
    The Taliban are also trying to control Afghanistan, where most of the world’s heroin comes from. So for those reasons, I want us to win, and I want the Taliban and Al Qaeda to lose. There is a lot on the line in this war. To compare this with Vietnam is not really fair, because the Vietnamese never flew planes into buildings and killed close to 3000 people from around the world in the US.
    What I would like to see, is an effective use of that money in this war. We have thrown billions to Pakistan, and they have not done the job of shutting down the Taliban. Whatever happened to attaching some strings to that money, like making it performance based? You do well, we give you more, you suck, we shut it down and go buy some more bullets for our guys. That is my simplistic take on it.

    Comment by headjundi — Monday, September 21, 2009 @ 9:30 PM

  3. I appreciate your comments headjundi. I lived through Vietnam and I know it is not the same but I also know what it is like to be in a country where you aren’t really wanted. I don’t know what the answers are? If we could win this war that would be great. I wonder if these guys are so entrenched not only in the mountains but the villages and cities that we will never root them out. The nukes are a huge reason to continue to try. I am really ticked at how the media has stopped covering this. We seem to be so interested in health care and Global Warming that the war we are fighting is way down the list.

    If this is in our national interest as it should be then we need to change our attitudes and really go after these guys regardless of the toes we step on. If we keep worrying about the politics then we will be there forever and never win. In that way we sacrifice lives for what?

    With these things in mind that is why I suggested what I did in the first comment I put up. I am not even trying to defend that view, I am just frustrated at the apathy!

    Comment by Charlie Bell — Tuesday, September 22, 2009 @ 9:24 AM

  4. I guess my frustration with this, is that we just made a huge spectacle of firing General McKiernen, and replaced him with the all star quarterback named General McChrystal, and we are treating McChrystal like a child.

    He has given his recommendations to turn around the war, and I say we rally around him and support the cause. Thats if we believe that we are justified for being there, and Afghanistan is truly the ‘good war’.

    Inevitably, this war will be either won or lost, much like with Vietnam, based on what happens on the political front.

    Comment by headjundi — Wednesday, September 23, 2009 @ 8:15 AM

  5. http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009%5C09%5C21%5Cstory_21-9-2009_pg7_15

    US embassy says no link to illegal arms

    Monday, September 21, 2009

    Daily Times

    ISLAMABAD: The US embassy has denied any involvement in the prohibited arms recovered by local police following a raid on an agency responsible for the security of the embassy.

    US embassy spokesman Richard Snelsire said the arms recovered from the security agency had nothing to do with the embassy, as the agency administration was responsible for equipping their staff.

    However, he confirmed the US embassy had signed an agreement with Dyn-Corp, and its affiliated Pakistani security agency Inter-Risk, to oversee the security of the embassy and its staff.

    Comment by headjundi — Wednesday, September 23, 2009 @ 6:32 PM

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress