Feral Jundi

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Industry Talk: State Will Hire Contractor To Supervise Private Embassy Guards

   Thanks to Samuel for providing the link to this story. So now we are into the practice of hiring a contractor to supervise a contractor? I guess alarm bells should be going off right now. lol  That way, DoS can blame contractors for everything and they can just wash their hands of the whole thing!

    I have to say, I just don’t get why this is sooooo hard for the DoS to comprehend.  If they just hired the guys they need through the federal system, and actually get off their ass and manage the contract, they just might get the kind of performance and service they desire. And if they are not getting enough folks, then up the pay for the thing.  If you pay a decent salary for these jobs, you will get plenty of applicants. But if you pay peanuts, you will get monkeys or worse yet, you will get no one.

    Is this laziness, a lack of leadership or a refusal to do what is right?  This just perplexes me, and especially with all the negative press they received on this.  This is just as perplexing as reducing the police training schedule for Afghans in the latest contract announcement from eight weeks to six weeks, and then expecting the company that wins the contract to produce competent police. It’s almost as if the government wants private industry to fail.

   Now I am not going to say that this so called ‘personal services’ contractor can’t do the job. I actually hope they kick ass. All I am saying is that you would think that the DoS would actually perform this job themselves so they don’t get another scathing report from the IG or run into another embarrassing incident with a poor performing company.

   On the positive side, I wonder who this company is that will be performing these third party services?  Will they be doing covert and overt inspections, and applying best industry practices to managing this contract?  How involved will they be in the supervision of this thing and will AGNA or whomever actually be on their best behavior around this company or what? Most of all, is this a sign of things to come–to have private industry tasked with managing private industry? –Matt

——————————————————————

State will hire contractor to supervise private embassy guards

By Robert Brodsky

March 23, 2010

The State Department plans to hire a personal services contractor to help supervise a private security company photographed last year hosting rowdy, alcohol-fueled parties near the American Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan.

In response to questions from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight, Ambassador Eric Boswell said State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security is in the process of selecting and hiring a personal services contractor that will reside at Camp Sullivan, just outside the embassy. A Diplomatic Security special agent currently oversees the camp.

(more…)

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Jobs: Protective Security Specialist (WPPS), OCONUS

   Interesting.  I didn’t know that Aegis was in the game of providing WPPS folks to DoS? Aegis is a good company, and I am sure they will do a great job with this. I am not the POC or Recruiter for this, and please go through the link I provided below in order to apply.

   By the way, if you follow that link below, there are other WPPS positions they are offering, so be sure to check them all out to find what would work for you.  Good luck and let me know how it goes. –Matt

——————————————————————

PROTECTIVE SECURITY SPECIALIST (WPPS)

Posted date: 2010-Jan-15

(ID: 3257)

Aegis is currently recruiting for a Protective Security Specialist.  The Protective Security Specialist Reports directly to the Detail Leader or Shift Leader.  He/she is responsible for the day to day protective security functions as specified in the daily post and detail orders.  Responsible for driving the lead vehicle or follow vehicle or act as the response agent during operations or advanced security preparations.  Maintains protective formation position during the Principal’s walking movements and provides security at the Principal’s residence r Command Post as required.

Required Minimum Qualifications:

    * Secret Clearance

    * U.S. Citizen

    * Level III English

    * 5 Years minimum military experience reflecting a discharge on a valid DD214 as Honorable

    * Successfully complete The Basic WPPS III PSS training

    * Three (3) years of experience in which One (1) year, of the three, shall include experience in protective security assignments. Experience can be gained in the employ of any national. State/Province, Local or commercial entities that provide high threat protective services

    * Maintain weapons qualifications for the Glock, M4, Shotgun, M240, M249, M203 and familiarization for the AK 47

    * Combat Life Saver or Combat Medic Qualified preferred but not required

    * Approved Background check

    * Physically Fit

Protective Security Specialist’s must possess the highest quality of professionalism, attention to detail and leadership skill which requires minimum to no supervision. They must be highly motivated and be able to work extremely well under stress and react effectively and efficiently to emergency situations

Please select ‘LLC’ when applying for the position.

Apply here.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Industry Talk: What is this DoS Security Protective Specialist All About?

 

     This is interesting, and certainly active on the forums.  What is this new position with DoS all about?  Well, I will tell you my personal opinion on it all.  Secretary Clinton needs us for the mission of protecting her people, but she really doesn’t like using private industry to do this.  So this is the next best thing.  You are basically a contractor that answers directly to the Foreign Service, as opposed to working for the Foreign Service through a full service company like Blackwater.  

     The crucial aspect of this, is that you will have to pass their 13 week DSTC academy, and then you can be called up and used for overseas stuff.  The caveat in this, is that you now have to answer to federal government management and structure.  Although some might look at that as a positive deal, because at least there are some protections in the government to make managers do what they are supposed to do.(EEO, Whistleblower Act, etc.)  But like most government, most managers are very good at working the system, and the strength of the checks and balances is questionable. Especially in a highly public incident that isn’t clear cut, kind of like the Nisour Square deal in Iraq.  And judging how DoS has treated that incident and Blackwater, I am not too confident on how they would treat contractors working directly for them. In forest fire fighting, I have seen management throw their people under the bus, to avoid getting involved and doing the right thing of protecting that employee.  

(more…)

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Maritime Security: US Efforts at the UN Concerning Somali Piracy

Filed under: Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , — Matt @ 2:28 PM

   Excellent news.  The anti-piracy effort should be a land and sea based strategy, and I am glad this is the thinking at DoS. –Head Jundi

——————————————————————- 

Office of the Spokesman for the Department of State

Washington, DC

December 11, 2008

Question Taken at December 11, 2008 Daily Press Briefing

Taken Question: U.S. Efforts at the UN Concerning Somali Piracy

Question:  What is the status of current U.S. efforts at the UN concerning Somali piracy? Have there been any discussions on a land-based effort?

Answer:  The United States recently circulated to Security Council members a draft resolution that would encourage the establishment of improved international cooperation between and among states, expand efforts to build judicial capacity to prosecute and incarcerate pirates, and affirm that those engaged in acts of piracy may be designated under the existing Security Council Somalia sanctions regimes.

The U.S. draft would also provide member states and regional organizations, in cooperation with the Somalia Transitional Federal Government, to extend its piracy interdiction efforts to include potential operations on Somali territory.

We believe that this resolution would mark an important step forward in the international community’s efforts to suppress and prevent acts of piracy off the coast of Somalia.

Released on December 11, 2008

Link to Statement Here

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress