Feral Jundi

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Afghanistan: U.S. to Boost Combat Force in Afghanistan

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 9:28 AM

      Most of the dozens of combat outposts and outlying bases in Afghanistan have soldiers or Marines assigned to gates or guard towers. But the Pentagon official said those troops could be shifted to more valuable duty.”They just stare out from the tower. So let’s bring in contractors,” the Pentagon official said. “Now you can have a thousand more troops in the field.”

     Here we go guys and gals.  Despite the negative news about security contractors recently, the military still has a mission to accomplish, and we are an important part of that mission.  We are the ones that will be freeing up the combat forces, so that they can go out there and fight.

     What we have to work on, is ‘being the guys that do it right when no one is looking’ and ‘having the courage to do what is right’. Be a leader out there. –Matt

—————————————————————-

U.S. to boost combat force in Afghanistan

Support units will be replaced by up to 14,000 ‘trigger-pullers,’ and noncombat posts will be contracted out, Defense officials say. The swap will allow the U.S. to keep its troop level unchanged.

By Julian E. Barnes

September 2, 2009

Reporting from Washington

U.S. officials are planning to add as many as 14,000 combat troops to the American force in Afghanistan by sending home support units and replacing them with “trigger-pullers,” Defense officials say.The move would beef up the combat force in the country without increasing the overall number of U.S. troops, a contentious issue as public support for the war slips. But many of the noncombat jobs are likely be filled by private contractors, who have proved to be a source of controversy in Iraq and a growing issue in Afghanistan.The plan represents a key step in the Obama administration’s drive to counter Taliban gains and demonstrate progress in the war nearly eight years after it began. (more…)

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Industry Talk: Afghanistan Contractors Outnumber Troops

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 8:22 AM

     As soon as I get a copy of the census, we will see how much security contractor use has risen in Iraq and Afghanistan.  That is the statistic I like tracking, and I love to dangle that in the face of the anti-contractors out there.

    But overall, nothing shocking in this article.  We all knew we would be playing a big role in the surge, and we will continue to do so regardless of the little thanks we receive.  Maybe one day, someone in a position of power will recognize the fact that we were crucial to the war effort.

     One note in particular is that somehow the defense planners, congress, and President Obama are all still supporting the concept of contracting in this war, despite the pressure from the main stream media.  So what does that mean if both President Bush (a Republican) and President Obama (a Democrat), became reliant on the use of contractors for their specific wartime goals?  Does this mean that security contractors and contractors in general are legitimate forces, or do we become illegitimate as soon as the war is over and the historians start cranking out the books?

     Gosh, I certainly feel legitimate, regardless of what the MSM might have to say about it.  And here are the numbers….. lol –Matt

—————————————————————–

WSJ

Afghanistan Contractors Outnumber Troops

Despite Surge in U.S. Deployments, More Civilians Are Posted in War Zone; Reliance Echoes the Controversy in Iraq

By AUGUST COLE

August 22, 2009

Even as U.S. troops surge to new highs in Afghanistan they are outnumbered by military contractors working alongside them, according to a Defense Department census due to be distributed to Congress — illustrating how hard it is for the U.S. to wean itself from the large numbers of war-zone contractors that proved controversial in Iraq.

The number of military contractors in Afghanistan rose to almost 74,000 by June 30, far outnumbering the roughly 58,000 U.S. soldiers on the ground at that point. As the military force in Afghanistan grows further, to a planned 68,000 by the end of the year, the Defense Department expects the ranks of contractors to increase more.

(more…)

Friday, July 31, 2009

Industry Talk: DoD Lacks Standards for Hiring Foreign Nationals, GAO Says

Defense was ordered to establish departmentwide standards under Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 but has been hindered by bureaucratic wrangling and a lack of leadership, GAO said in a report released July 31. 

   As you have seen, I like to put the best quotes that summarizes the story, front and center.  And the two key points are bureaucratic wrangling and a lack of leadership.  Ding, ding, ding, and the GAO wins a prize!!!

   If you have been a FJ reader for a bit, you would know that leadership is a big thing here.  It is one of the dominant themes of Jundism as well, and I am glad to see that the GAO is willing to call it like it is.

     This is a total lack of leadership, plain and simple. And what kills me with this, is that they are now just talking about standards for LNs.  How many thousands of LN’s have we hired for this war, and yet no standard background check or skills assessment?  That we have depended upon the companies to pick and choose, and apply whatever standard they think is acceptable?

(more…)

Monday, February 23, 2009

Industry Talk: DoD Contractor Numbers as of December 2008

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk,Iraq — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 1:50 PM

     It’s always nice to see just exactly where the numbers sit in this industry.  This report does not include all the NGO’s or other companies using security or contractors in the war, but it is an interesting look at DoD related contracts. The numbers are interesting, and especially in Afghanistan. –Matt

—————————————————————– 

U.S. Department of Defense Contractor numbers as of December 2008

CONTRACTOR SUPPORT OF U.S. OPERATIONS

IN USCENTCOM AOR, IRAQ, AND AFGHANISTAN

BACKGROUND:  This update reports DoD contractor personnel numbers in theater and outlines DoD efforts to improve management of contractors accompanying U.S. forces.  It covers DoD contractor personnel deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) area of responsibility (AOR) as of December 31, 2008.

KEY POINTS: Ending 1st quarter FY 2009, USCENTCOM reported approximately 259,400 contractor personnel working for the DoD in the USCENTCOM AOR. 

Total DoD contractor numbers in Iraq: 148,050

*9,218 are doing security (about 6%) 

*782 of those security contractors are American/Coalition citizens, 7,226 are Third Country Nationals and 1,210 are Local Nationals.

Total DoD contractor numbers in Afghanistan: 71,755

*3,689 are doing security (about 6%)

*15  of those security contractors are American/coalition citizens, 23 are Third Country Nationals and 3,651 Local Nationals.

Go Here to Read the Report

 

Monday, November 10, 2008

Industry Talk: Changing the Culture of Pentagon Contracting Report

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 1:29 PM

      Boy, where do I start with this thing.  First of all, in their panel of experts and contributors to this report, I didn’t see any security contractors?  What is up with that?  You would think these guys would at least bring in a couple of actual guys that have done the job out there and could give some perspective about the industry.  I was never contacted about this, nor have I seen them advertise on the forums.  The only names I recognized were Robert Young Pelton and David Isenberg.  Pelton is a travel author who writes books about traveling to war zones, that also wrote a book about security contractors. Isenberg has a column about the industry over at UPI, and that is it for input about the industry. The rest of the panel were experts in foreign policy and other related fields. I think they would have produced a better product if they would have actually included us ‘grunts’ that have some ground truth input about the industry.

      The other one that killed me about this report, is they made the suggestion that security contractors should only be used for static security posts in the war.  That PSD and Convoy operations should be done by the military.  Where I disagree on this, is this completely limits operational capability for the companies over there that are operating on their own.  And this also rips away the military to serve civilian supply efforts.  So will these civilian companies pay the military to do these services.  How about for transporting employees for leave or for medical situations?  Will the military provide an on call shuttle service for us civilians operating at these camps?

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress