Feral Jundi

Monday, May 4, 2009

Legal News: Rep. David Price Introduces the Transparency and Accountability in Security Contracting Act (HR 2177)

   Wow, I caught this over at Private Military Herald, and thought it to be pretty cool.  Rep. David Price is introducing some legislation that I think is fantastic.  And please read below what his intentions are, because this is from his personal blog. His goal is not to shut us down, his goal is to find ways to better manage this industry, so we can go out there and do great things for this country and even for this world. Just read this passage from below, and tell me that isn’t motivating?

      As pirate attacks off the coast of Somalia have surged, private vessels have increasingly sought protection from security contractors.  As the U.S. presence surges in Afghanistan, experts expect the presence of security contractors to surge as well.  And, as we struggle to confront genocide in Darfur, many have suggested using private contractors in place of U.S. or international troops.  It is critical that we have a regulatory regime in place to effectively manage and oversee security contractors now and in the future – whether in Afghanistan, Sudan, or on the high seas – and that’s why I recently reintroduced my Transparency and Accountability in Security Contracting Act  (H.R. 2177).

      That doesn’t sound like ‘PMC’s are not legitimate forces’ crazy talk or ‘abolish the bloodthirsty mercenaries’ talk, this actually sounds like…gulp…. should I say it?  Acceptance?  Oh say it isn’t so, and Max Weber is certainly rolling in his grave right now. lol  

     Seriously though, I think this is great and let’s see if it passes. In the comments section, I also mentioned that Incident Command would be a good one to throw in there as well, because then that would give us the ability to interact better in disaster relief operations nationally. PSC’s and PMC’s could also be registered in the Federal databases for disaster relief or national security related issues for that matter. I brought up the example of the Katrina Hurricane, and how PSC’s and PMC’s could have used Incident Command, but didn’t because it wasn’t mandated.  That if we were following the 2004 DHS mandate about such things, that effort could have been more organized and more efficient, which absolutely equates to saving lives when time is everything in those types of incidents.

   I also brought up the Federal Fire Services here in the US, and how they have organized and standardized fire fighting protocols for both the federal agencies and private industries involved.  I have talked about that here on FJ before, and this would be one way to implement the legislation outlined below. If any aides for Rep. Price are reading this, please feel free to contact me if you would like to learn more, or use the search feature on FJ.  –Matt

—————————————————————— 

Better Oversight on Private Security Contractors (Rep. David Price)

May 1st, 2009

When I first started working to improve management and oversight of Private Security Contractors (PSCs) in 2004, observers described Iraq as a Wild West – a place where PSCs could shoot up buildings and people without any law enforcement in sight.  Indeed, between 2004 and 2007, there were numerous incidents in which rogue contractors attacked innocent civilians without any repercussion.  The infamous 2007 incident in which Blackwater contractors killed 17 civilians in Baghdad’s Nisour Square was the shocking coda to this era.

(more…)

Friday, April 17, 2009

Industry Talk: Injured War Zone Contractors Fight to Get Care From AIG and Other Insurers

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 11:49 PM

“The civilian contractors have played an indispensable role in the two conflicts, delivering fuel to frontline troops, guarding U.S. diplomats and translating for soldiers during dangerous raids. More than 1,400 civilian workers have died and 31,000 have been wounded or injured in the two war zones.”

     Wow, ‘indispensable’?  That is actually pretty kind, and for someone like me that follows quite a bit of copy about this industry, it is nice to actually see our group be recognized for once as ‘indispensable’.  It is far better than ‘liability’ or…gulp, ‘mercenaries’ (in the derogatory sense), and I will take that sly little complement.  I will not let up though, and I am sure Jake and the crew are the same way.  Kaizen all the way.

     This story was first introduced to me by Marcie, Don and then I saw it pop up in other forms over at PMH, COR, and Danger Zone Blog.  So this definitely deserves a look and thanks to all that gave me the heads up.    

     I am glad to see some main stream media attention put towards this, and I absolutely think it is important that we take care of our wounded warriors, no matter if they are private contractors or military.  Their sacrifice should mean the same to all of us, because they are the ones that stepped forward to do the job.  That is the least we can do.

   As for the on the job injury, I can understand that one.  I broke my femur on a fire jump when I was smokejumping.  The key with getting injured, and dealing with the government, is persistence and knowledge.  You have to know the system inside and out, and constantly fight it.  If you can find an advocate to help you through the process, that is extremely advisable.  There are so many programs and so many rules and codes and this and that, that you have to go through, on top of trying to heal up, that it is just a mess sometimes to get your stuff squared away.  One idea, is do your research online and find blogs or mentors online that can help.  There are groups that will help too, and just be persistent to get the care you need, and get the costs covered.  As an example, I was fighting with medical bills and trying to get the government to pay for that stuff 6 years after the fact.  What a headache and some guys just give up on it, and eat the costs or do without the care.  Just keep up the fight and hold the government, insurance companies, and your company accountable for the care you deserve. –Matt

——————————————————————

Probublica

 

Contractor Tim Newman, left; contractor Kevin Smith-Idol, middle; widow Rita Richardson, whose husband was killed by a roadside blast in Iraq. (Photos courtesy of Tim Newman, ABC News, Francine Orr/Los Angeles Times)

Injured War Zone Contractors Fight to Get Care From AIG and Other Insurers

by T. Christian Miller, ProPublica and Doug Smith, the Los Angeles Times – April 16, 2009 10:25 pm EDT

Reporting from Los Angeles and Washington — Civilian workers who suffered devastating injuries while supporting the U.S. war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan have come home to a grinding battle for basic medical care, artificial limbs, psychological counseling and other services.

(more…)

Monday, April 6, 2009

Industry Talk: Pentagon Seeks to Dump Contractors for 30,000 New Workers

Filed under: Government Work,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 9:47 PM

  Cool.  More jobs for folks.  The key now, is for the government to be able to hang on to these new civil servants, or suffer the same fate as the poor companies that treat their people like crap or have poor management.  And if the government does not pay a fair wage for these positions, then they will have a tough time filling some of this stuff.  But like I said, this is great news for those that need jobs.

   As for the war related jobs, I just don’t see a major shift.  In fact, security contractors will probably be in more of a demand, as the war expands in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Africa, as well as maintains itself in Iraq over the coming years.  –Matt

——————————————————————    

Pentagon seeks to dump contractors for 30,000 new workers

By Christopher Hinton

Last update: 4:02 p.m. EDT April 6, 2009

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The Pentagon wants to hire 13,000 new civil sernvants in 2010, with plans to hire as many as 30,000 new workers over the next five years, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said Monday. “Under this budget request, we will reduce the number of support service contractors from our current 39% of the workforce to the pre-2001 level of 26%, and replace them with full-time government employees,” Gates said. Military suppliers have seen a windfall of contracts from the military since 2001 to provide services such as security, translation, logistics, and technical training. 

Story Here

 

Monday, September 1, 2008

Industry Talk: Courage and Sacrifice

Filed under: Afghanistan,Industry Talk — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 11:37 AM

     I wanted to post this story, because it was truly inspiring.  Most of the time you hear of Military guys going back to the war zone after injuries, and those are totally motivating.  To see a guy operating over there, while wearing a prosthetic is something else to see.  It takes a certain kind of resolve to get yourself back in the game like that, and I have tons of respect for our injured troops.  And what mostly drives them, is the desire to get back with their comrades.

 

    But this story is a little different.  When a contractor gets injured and expresses a desire to go back to that war zone, then that is really unique.  It further emphasizes the kind of dedication that is out there, both on the Military side and Contractor side and really is motivating to read about.  And for Mr. Shah, thanks for everything you have done and sacrificed for this country and the war effort.  I also know that Mr. Shah is not alone, and that I know of other contractors that have returned back to the war zones they were injured at. –Head Jundi

 

——————————————————————

 

The New York Times

September 1, 2008

A Kind of Courage That’s Hard to Translate

 

By CARA BUCKLEY

 

The military translator from Queens sat beside his mother in a wheelchair in a hospital room on Manhattan’s Upper East Side on Thursday. His right leg was encased in a black boot, affixed with Velcro straps from his swollen toes to his knee. What was left of his left leg, which had been amputated at the knee, was wrapped in a snug elastic rubber stocking on which the word “stump” had been scrawled.

 

The man’s name is Syed Shah and he was grievously wounded in July in a bomb attack on a military convoy in Afghanistan, where he had been working as a translator for soldiers battling the Taliban. Mr. Shah is learning to walk with a prosthetic leg, though his progress is severely hindered because he cannot put any weight on his partly shattered right leg.

 

Yet to his family’s shock and anguish, and to his doctors’ awe, Mr. Shah is aiming to be back in Afghanistan by year’s end.

(more…)

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Industry Talk: Introducing Robin Barratt, and a Critique of the SIA

Filed under: Industry Talk,United Kingdom — Tags: , , — Matt @ 12:33 PM

     For this post, I wanted to introduce a new guest author from across the pond.  Robin Barratt is his name and he is a close protection specialist, author and the founder of the British Bodyguard Association.  I look forward to his future articles about Close Protection and his latest reports about the pulse of the industry in his neck of the woods.  

 

     At the BBA, there are several areas to check out which I think are worth mentioning.  There is a forum with job postings, a magazine called ‘The Circuit’, a blog and a store.  At the store, you can check out some of Robin’s books. There is a subscription fee and/or membership fee for the BBA, but if you are in the business of collecting information about the industry and getting connected, then it should be will be well worth it.  Especially if you are able to make a connection or get a job through the BBA network.

 

    This article below is just a taste of the kind of stuff that Robin covers and if you like that, then his magazine ‘The Circuit’ would be the ticket.  Also, with the membership with the BBA, you get an online newsletter that is a lot like the Blackwater Tactical Newsletter.  Lots of up to date information and he posts the latest jobs. –Head Jundi  

 

—————————————————————— 

 

 How the Government has failed the British Close Protection Industry

Established in 2003, The Security Industry Authority (SIA) was set up “to raise standards of professionalism and skills within the private security industry and to promote and spread best practice”. It reports directly to the British Government’s Home Office, and its remit is “to help protect society by collaboratively developing and achieving high standards within the private security industry”. However, in my opinion, specifically within the Close Protection sector (as well as the door supervisor area) , it has done just the opposite. 

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress