Feral Jundi

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Military News: Gates Recommends Mattis For Central Command Job

   What a strange and crazy couple of weeks.  Who would have guessed that all of this shuffling of military leadership would have happened, and like this?  We get rid of McChrystal because of comments his team made in a Rolling Stones article, we pull Petraeus from CENTCOM and make him the guy in charge of Afghanistan, and now the toughs as nails Marine named Mattis will be in charge of CENTCOM. What a ride! Interesting stuff and I look forward to how this new mix of leadership will pan out for the overall war effort. –Matt

——————————————————————

Gates Recommends Mattis for Central Command Job

By Jim GaramoneAmerican Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, July 8, 2010 – Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates today recommended Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mattis to be the next commander of U.S. Central Command.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has recommended to President Barack Obama that he nominate Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mattis, commander of U.S. Joint Forces Command, to succeed Army Gen. David H. Petraeus as commander of U.S.

If confirmed by the Senate, Mattis will succeed Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, who now commands U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Mattis currently is commander of U.S. Joint Forces Command.

“General Mattis has proven to be one of the military’s most innovative and iconoclastic thinkers,” Gates said during a Pentagon news conference today. “His insights into the nature of warfare in the 21st century have influenced my own views about how the armed forces must be shaped and postured for the future.”

(more…)

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Afghanistan: Petraeus Calls For Unity Of Effort

     This is significant, because this speech sets the pace and tone of the new management in Afghanistan.  This is an excellent first step, and I absolutely agree that unity of effort is the one thing we should be able to control, before we press forward.  That means everyone comes together and rallies around the strategy and goals, and insures their efforts do not negatively impact the overall effort. Unity of effort is vital to success in war.

     What is interesting though, is that Petraeus is making great pains to create this revitalized unity of effort in Afghanistan amongst all the top civilian and military leadership, but he is also missing a huge group that must also be brought under this umbrella of ‘unity of effort’. That group is contractors….all 110,000 plus contractors working in Afghanistan.

     So the next question with that, is how do you reach all of these contractors, and how do you insure they all are focused on unity of effort? What contractor general or CEO would you talk with, to get something like this done?  That is a good question, and because there is a lack of centralized authority or organized labor for this gaggle of civilian workers, all Petraeus really can do is get the word out on how each and every one of us can contribute to this ‘unity of effort’. He can can also make sure that contracts that are signed have language that pushes along a company towards this unity of effort, and he could also personally talk with the CEO’s of companies and insure they are on the same sheet of music.

     Those are just some ideas, but I do know one thing.  If he does nothing about contractors, then how could he or anyone expect any kind of synergy or synchronicity?  How could expect any kind of harmony with operations or interactions with one another? In other words, you cannot treat us like the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about. If Petraeus wants to be the great unifier, contractors are a group he must bring under the tent. –Matt

———————————————-

Petraeus Calls for United Effort to Win Afghan War

Ayaz Gul

3 July 2010

New U.S. commander of the international military mission in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus, has called for united efforts to solve the problems of the war-ravaged country. The U.S. general made his first public comments a day after arriving in Kabul to take command of the 140,000 American and NATO forces.General David Petraeus has arrived in Afghanistan to lead the international forces at a time of rising Taliban insurgency. The month of June was the deadliest for the U.S.-led coalition since the Afghan war began nearly nine years ago.Addressing hundreds of local and foreign guests gathered at the U.S. Embassy to mark America’s Independence Day, General Petraeus underlined the need for unity to deal with the challenges in Afghanistan.”This is an effort in which we must achieve unity of effort and common purpose, civilian and military, Afghan and international, we are part of one team with one mission,” he said. (more…)

Monday, June 28, 2010

Strategy: Secrets From Inside The Obama War Room

Filed under: Afghanistan,Strategy — Tags: , , , , , , , — Matt @ 2:01 PM

     I know this is a little old, but it is totally relevant to today’s discussion about the future of Afghanistan.  As you read through this story, you come to understand why McChrystal or any other military leader in this war might be frustrated.  I said this before, and I will say this again.  There is not a general out there that thinks that declaring a withdrawal date is a good idea in the context of winning wars.  This administration is set on July 2011, and General Petraeus has made his promises to that administration that he could finish this in that time frame. It is a promise he will have to break in my view.

     Most of all, the Taliban love this date, and it is a countdown to their victory. The enemy will certainly pour it on as this date gets closer, and I just don’t see how this is helpful for any kind of plans with Afghanistan. Or the Taliban will just sit and wait, and then pour it on as soon as we leave. It just makes no strategic sense.

     Petraeus has a lot of work to do in turning around the war. There is alleviating the fears that Karzai has with this date, there is letting our troops fight the way they see fit and allowing them to win battles, there is dealing with Pakistan and ensuring they continue their fight, there is the training of the ANA and police so they can take control of the country, and all of this is dependent on changing that stupid date for withdrawal. Or Petraeus can keep his promise of defeat and go down with the ship. Only time will tell, and the clock is ticking. –Matt

——————————————————————

Secrets From Inside the Obama War Room

by Jonathan Alter

May 15, 2010

The first of 10 “AFPAK” meetings came on Sept. 13, when the president gathered 16 advisers in the Situation Room in the basement of the White House. This was to be the most methodical national-security decision in a generation. Deputy national-security adviser Tom Donilon had commissioned research that backed up an astonishing historical truth: neither the Vietnam War nor the Iraq War featured any key meetings where all the issues and assumptions were discussed by policymakers. In both cases the United States was sucked into war inch by inch.

The Obama administration was determined to change that. “For the past eight years, whatever the military asked for, they got,” Obama explained later. “My job was to slow things down.” The president had something precious in modern crisis management: time. “I had to put up with the ‘dithering’ arguments from Dick Cheney or others,” Obama said. “But as long as I wasn’t shaken by the political chatter, I had the time to work through all these issues and ask a bunch of tough questions and force people to sharpen their pencils until we arrived at the best possible solution.”

(more…)

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Military News: McChrystal Steps Down, Petraeus Takes Over Afghanistan Post

     McChrystal is replaced by Petraeus.  The reason for McChrystal being let go is because of what was said in the Rolling Stone article.  The choice of Petraeus was the best choice for the continuity of the mission and strategy according to the President.-Matt

——————————————————————

Petraeus to Replace McChrystal

Jonathan Weisman

JUNE 23, 2010

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama relieved Gen. Stanley McChrystal of commanding forces in Afghanistan, swiftly acting in the wake of derisive comments Gen. McChrystal and his aides made to Rolling Stone magazine, according to a White House official.

The president will announce the decision in the Rose Garden shortly. Gen. David Petraeus, the head of the military’s Central Command and the architect of the surge of forces into Iraq in 2007, will take over as the commanding general in Afghanistan, administration officials said.

The decision to put Gen. Petraeus in command sends a signal that the president stands behind the counterinsurgency tactics pushed hard by Gen. McChrystal and championed by Gen. Petraeus. Technically, as combatant commander in the military region that includes Afghanistan and the Middle East, Gen. Petraeus was Gen. McChrystal’s commanding officer.

By agreeing to take command, Gen. Petraeus himself was showing resolve to see the counterinsurgency effort through in Afghanistan.

Gen. McChrystal left the White House Wednesday morning after about a half-hour meeting with the president to discuss the critical comments the general and his aides made about top administration officials. The general was not seen returning to the White House for the Afghanistan strategy session later in the morning, as he has been expected, the Associated Press reported.

Mr. Obama had summoned Gen. McChrystal back to the White House for a face-to-face meeting to answer for critical comments he made about the administration that are raising questions about the general’s future.

Gen. McChrystal has apologized for the comments he made in this week’s issue of Rolling Stone magazine titled “The Runaway General.”

Gen. McChrystal is quoted as accusing U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry of undermining his efforts in Afghanistan. Aides to the general are quoted anonymously as saying Obama didn’t seem to know who McChrystal was when he appointed him to run the war early last year.

Story here.

 

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Maritime Security: Petraeus-Shippers Should Consider Armed Guards

Filed under: Maritime Security,Somalia — Tags: , , , , — Matt @ 7:48 AM

“It’s tough to be on the end of a water hose if the other guy is on the end of an RPG. So you’ve got to think your way through that calculation as well.” 

   I wonder if Petraeus reads FJ? LOL So maybe now the shipping industry might finally adjust their thinking on such things? –Matt

—————————————————————– 

Petraeus: Shippers should consider armed guards

By LARA JAKES, Associated Press Writer Lara Jakes, Associated Press Writer Fri Apr 24

WASHINGTON – The global shipping industry should consider placing armed guards on its boats to ward off pirates who have become increasingly violent, the U.S. military commander who oversees the African coastline said Friday.

Gen. David Petraeus, who came to the Capitol to talk about a wide variety of issues, told a House committee Friday that just trying to outrun or block pirates from boarding cargo ships isn’t enough to deter sea bandits off the Somali coast who are becoming more aggressive. The Pentagon is starting to study how to better protect merchant shipping, but hasn’t yet come up with a formal plan.

The shipping industry has resisted arming their boats, which would deny them port in some nations.

In response to questions from a House Appropriations subcommittee, Petraeus said defensive preparations short of armed guards “can work. You can have water hoses and others that can make it more difficult.”

But in a wry tone, he added: “It’s tough to be on the end of a water hose if the other guy is on the end of an RPG. So you’ve got to think your way through that calculation as well.”

An RPG is a rocket-propelled grenade launcher.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress