Feral Jundi

Monday, July 26, 2010

Industry Talk: U.S. Pledges More Support To Battle Somali Rebels

“We have reviewed since Sunday the support that we’re providing to Amisom. We are going to beef that up,” Mr. Crowley said. “We’ve been the major contributor to the Amisom mission. That won’t change.”

The U.S. State Department, under a program known as Africap, provides funding for private contractors to train, outfit, transport and supply African troops in various peacekeeping missions. The State Department’s latest contract, which began in September 2009, provides $1.5 billion to private contractors to outfit Amisom and other troops. 

*****

     This is the part of the article I clued in on.  I imagine ‘beef that up’ equates to more money for the AFRICAP program, and similar programs.  So it will be interesting to see if any new changes come down the pipe.

     If you follow what is going on with Somalia right now, things are happening quickly, that will lead to the reality of more troops from throughout the region joining the AMISOM mission.  My question though is that will these troops be professional enough to do the job, or will they do more harm than good and bring more support to Al Shabab?

     Hopefully with this beefing up process, we also send some folks in there that can assist in organizing and helping along these new troops.  Unfortunately, if what happened to Ethiopia is any clue as to how all this will go down, then these new armies have a lot of work cut out for them. I wish them well though, and I certainly hope they can stick it to the Al Shaboob. –Matt

——————————————————————

U.S. Pledges More Support to Battle Somali Rebels

July 16, 2010

By WILL CONNORS in Kampala, Uganda, and KEITH JOHNSON in Washington

The Obama administration on Thursday said it would bolster its support to the African Union troops providing much of the firepower in Somalia’s battle against al Shabaab, the Somali militant group that has claimed responsibility for Sunday’s deadly blasts in Uganda.

The triple bombing in Kampala, Uganda’s capital, killed 76 people, including one American, gathered in a restaurant and a bar during Sunday’s World Cup soccer final.

Ugandan officials say they believe more than 20 members of Somalia’s al Shabaab militant group entered Uganda several months before the blasts. Ugandan authorities have arrested nine people, all Somalis, in connection with the attack since Monday, according to a Ugandan military official close to the investigation.

Uganda is part of an African Union force that launched an offensive early this month, alongside Somalia’s government, against al Shabaab militants who control large swaths of largely lawless Somalia.

An Al Shabaab leader on Thursday thanked its militants who carried out the weekend attacks and said more such attacks would be carried out in Uganda. “I say to the Ugandan president what has happened in Kampala was only the beginning. We will keep revenging what your soldiers remorselessly did to our people,” Sheik Muktar Abu Zubayr said in an audio message played on Mogadishu radio stations, according to the Associated Press.

(more…)

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Al Qaeda: The Next Afghanistan–Somalia, Yemen, Or Both?

     It is important to take a step back sometimes, and get a feel for the world wide situation with this enemy we are fighting.  Afghanistan or Pakistan is not the only game in town, and what I wanted to do below is put up some current significant events that highlight how global this war is.

     A couple of things that came to mind while reading this stuff.  Imagine if both Yemen and Somalia fell to these Al Qaeda backed groups, and these countries became sanctuaries for AQ?  You would have two Islamic extremist states who would control both sides of the Gulf of Aden and turn that sucker into a gauntlet for piracy or whatever.  But I would even go as far as to say that the piracy we are now familiar with, would instead transition into something else.  We would see these pirates turn into ‘jihadist privateers’, and extremists would certainly profit from these ventures.

     The reason I say this is that both countries would be under the control of these extremists, and therefore any activity that happens in those countries under their watch, would be done with their blessing. Either directly or indirectly, they would profit from this piracy. Of course their form of the letter of marque would probably be the fatwa, but either way, I speculate that these extremists will not stop the activity.  They will be in a better position to control it and profit from this activity.

     Worse yet, obtaining ships and hostages is exactly the kind of jihadist ‘ammo’ that these guys would like. But the really big money maker for jihad, will be the transportation of drugs, guns, and people.  If Yemen and Somalia are both unstable or are under control of these extremists, this kind of money making activities will increase, and further help to fund Al Qaeda’s war against the west. They would have operating bases to train at, and they could also do business with drug cartels for transport or even storage–all for a price. Jihad requires funding, and having control of these countries would be key. Strategically speaking, it is a great move for Al Qaeda to focus on taking Yemen and Somalia.

     So what does all of this mean for our industry or for the current war effort?  Good question.  I think for our industry, we will expect to see an increased demand for armed security contractors on ships. Navies will soon reduce their costly patrols or escorts, and continue to advise the shipping industry to take on the costs of securing their own vessels.  We will still see anti-piracy operations out there, but I just don’t see it being enough to cover the kind of area we are talking about. Cost and operational scope comes to mind, and the world’s navies need private industry.  Private industry still needs the power and capabilities of those navies to come to their rescue if at a point of being overwhelmed, but still, the ocean is just too massive for the world’s navies to be every where and all at once.

     We will also see more African and Middle Eastern training opportunities for companies.  The ACOTA program is just one example, and training the various African nations who are most impacted by islamic extremists will be a big focus.  DynCorp is already training Ugandan troops before they ship out to Somalia.

     As for direct involvement, who knows?  Somalia is one of those places that absolutely needs security and stability, and it takes some serious muscle to do that.  I do not think the AU is the best force for the job, because the UN has no intention of using that army to do what it needs to do–and that is go on the offense.  Instead the AU is just sitting there and dying, while Al Shabab and others are attacking them daily. What a waste of manpower and equipment.

     I also think that it is interesting that Saudi Arabia has depended upon the company Vinnell Arabia for training up the SANG all these years, and that if Yemen turns into an ‘Afghanistan’ in the region, Saudi forces will have their hands full with dealing with terrorists pouring over the borders.  Some of that high dollar training they have been getting from Vinnell will be quite handy.

     For places like Somalia though, I say either send in a professional state sponsored army, or contract with a private military company, and give them the mission to clear and hold Somalia.(bring in contractors and the like for the build portion) And if a company like Executive Outcomes can be as successful as they were in places like Sierra Leon or Anglola, with the limited man power and resources they had, then I see no reason why a company today could not produce the same results if they followed the EO model.

     A company like Xe could put together a force that would absolutely be capable and willing to do a job like this. And now that the US government has made it clear that it fully supports and embraces the capabilities of companies like Xe for work in war zones, then I just don’t see how they are not good enough for stopping the Al Shabab in Somalia, or for battling extremists in Yemen?

     Or we can watch as those countries fall to extremists, and the neighbors to these countries pay the price.  Worse yet, terrorists from these sanctuaries span out even further into the west to conduct martyrdom missions and kill innocent people. –Matt

Is Yemen the Next Afghanistan?

New al-Qaida threat: Somali group claims blasts

Who is al-Shabab? Somali terror army extends reach

Nigerian sect leader praises al Qaeda, warns US

——————————————————————-

Is Yemen the Next Afghanistan?

By ROBERT F. WORTH

July 6, 2010

Just before dawn on Dec. 24, an American cruise missile soared high over the southern coast of the Arabian peninsula, arced down toward the dark mountains above the Rafadh Valley in Yemen’s Shabwa province and found its mark, crashing into a small stone house on a hillside where five young men were sleeping. Half a mile away, a 27-year-old Yemeni tribesman named Ali Muhammad Ahmed was awakened by the sound. Stumbling out of bed, he quickly dressed, slung his AK-47 over his shoulder and climbed down a footpath to the valley that shelters his village, two hours from the nearest paved road. He already sensed what had happened. A week earlier, an American airstrike killed dozens of people in a neighboring province as part of an expanded campaign against Al Qaeda militants. (Although the U.S. military has acknowledged playing a role in the airstrikes, it has never publicly confirmed that it fired the missiles.)

(more…)

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Afghanistan: Petraeus Calls For Unity Of Effort

     This is significant, because this speech sets the pace and tone of the new management in Afghanistan.  This is an excellent first step, and I absolutely agree that unity of effort is the one thing we should be able to control, before we press forward.  That means everyone comes together and rallies around the strategy and goals, and insures their efforts do not negatively impact the overall effort. Unity of effort is vital to success in war.

     What is interesting though, is that Petraeus is making great pains to create this revitalized unity of effort in Afghanistan amongst all the top civilian and military leadership, but he is also missing a huge group that must also be brought under this umbrella of ‘unity of effort’. That group is contractors….all 110,000 plus contractors working in Afghanistan.

     So the next question with that, is how do you reach all of these contractors, and how do you insure they all are focused on unity of effort? What contractor general or CEO would you talk with, to get something like this done?  That is a good question, and because there is a lack of centralized authority or organized labor for this gaggle of civilian workers, all Petraeus really can do is get the word out on how each and every one of us can contribute to this ‘unity of effort’. He can can also make sure that contracts that are signed have language that pushes along a company towards this unity of effort, and he could also personally talk with the CEO’s of companies and insure they are on the same sheet of music.

     Those are just some ideas, but I do know one thing.  If he does nothing about contractors, then how could he or anyone expect any kind of synergy or synchronicity?  How could expect any kind of harmony with operations or interactions with one another? In other words, you cannot treat us like the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about. If Petraeus wants to be the great unifier, contractors are a group he must bring under the tent. –Matt

———————————————-

Petraeus Calls for United Effort to Win Afghan War

Ayaz Gul

3 July 2010

New U.S. commander of the international military mission in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus, has called for united efforts to solve the problems of the war-ravaged country. The U.S. general made his first public comments a day after arriving in Kabul to take command of the 140,000 American and NATO forces.General David Petraeus has arrived in Afghanistan to lead the international forces at a time of rising Taliban insurgency. The month of June was the deadliest for the U.S.-led coalition since the Afghan war began nearly nine years ago.Addressing hundreds of local and foreign guests gathered at the U.S. Embassy to mark America’s Independence Day, General Petraeus underlined the need for unity to deal with the challenges in Afghanistan.”This is an effort in which we must achieve unity of effort and common purpose, civilian and military, Afghan and international, we are part of one team with one mission,” he said. (more…)

Legal News: Bill Shaw Has Been Acquitted!!!

     This is fantastic news and Bill can now call this his ‘independence day’.  Excellent work by everyone in bringing attention to this as well. It was so cool to see the media attention, or guys like Michael Yon just hammering away on getting this story out there. I was very impressed to see all the letters and commentary at the British Embassy in Kabul Facebook Page by friends and supporters of Bill, and every little bit counts. So thanks to everyone for getting the word out and helping out a contractor who was wronged. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Cleared Briton Bill Shaw describes Afghan ‘living hell’

Sunday, 4 July 2010

Bill Shaw said he felt “absolutely elated” but the last few months had been “living hell”

A British man acquitted of bribery by an Afghan appeal court has described time in prison as “a living hell”.

Bill Shaw, a 52-year-old former Army officer from Leeds, was found guilty of bribing officials in March.

At the time, he was manager of a security firm providing protection to foreigners. He said he thought he paid a legitimate fine.

Mr Shaw told the BBC he was looking forward to “proper freedom”. His family said they were “absolutely elated”.

The appeal court cited lack of evidence as the reason for dropping the charges.

At his trial at Afghanistan’s newly-established anti-corruption court in March, Mr Shaw admitted paying for the release of two impounded vehicles but insisted he thought it was a fine.

We’ve been sure of dad’s innocence all along and we are truly grateful to the appeal court for its decision

Lisa Lucklyn-Malone Bill Shaw’s daughter

He was jailed for two years and fined £16,185.

Afghan officials who took the money have since disappeared.

Mr Shaw, who served for 28 years in the British army and was awarded the MBE for his service, was held in Kabul’s Pul-e-Charkhi prison, alongside inmates from the Taliban and al-Qaeda.

He told the BBC he was “very, very excited” he had been cleared, but the last four months had been “in all honesty, a living hell”.

“I never thought, as an honest person with integrity, that I’d be put in this position.

“That’s why I never ran away in the first place, even though advised to. But I didn’t because I stood, and I’ve got principles.

“And I’m just looking forward now to proper freedom now and taking these chains off,” he said.

Mr Shaw’s daughter Lisa Lucklyn-Malone, who lives in Kent, said the family was “over the moon” and her father “deserved” to be released.

“He called from the court room, choking back emotion, he was finding it hard to speak, but said ‘I’m coming home, I’m free, it’s brilliant’.

“We’ve been sure of dad’s innocence all along and we are truly grateful to the appeal court for its decision,” she said.

She went on to thank people “all over the world” for their “incredible support”.

She said her father had lost a lot of weight, and was physcially and mentally drained, but the news would have “picked him up 100%”.

‘Positively medieval”

The BBC’s Quentin Sommerville in Kabul, said Mr Shaw told him it was “unbelievable”.

“He’s clearly in shock, he didn’t really know whether these charges were going to be dropped against him or whether the appeal would be successful,” he said.

Our correspondent said Mr Shaw was likely to be released within a week.

But he added the “positively medieval” and “very dangerous” prison that Mr Shaw had been held in had taken its toll.

A Foreign Office spokeswoman said she was “pleased” for Mr Shaw and his family and consular staff were liaising with officials in Kabul to determine a date for his return to the UK.

“We welcome the appeal court’s decision which is now subject to finalisation in the Supreme Court.

“The UK continues to strongly support the work of the Afghan government to counter corruption and reinforce the rule of law in Afghanistan,” she said.

At the appeal ruling, Mr Shaw’s co-defendant, Afghan bodyguard and translator Maiwand Limar, had his sentence downgraded from two years to eight months.

Story here.

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Afghanistan: The Heroes Of Edinburgh International Defend D.A.I/U.S.A.I.D In Kunduz, 6 Taliban Killed!

      “The actions taken by the EI security staff in defense of the compound and project staff were nothing short of heroic,” said DAI President and CEO James Boomgard. “We are deeply grateful for their bravery, and for the work they do day in, day out, to make our development mission possible. Our hearts go out to the families of the deceased at this terrible hour.”

——————————————————————

     Rest in peace to the fallen heroes of Edinburgh International.  You defended your client and paid the ultimate price in the process. USAID and the companies involved in this should award these fallen heroes with medals of valor, because if these were soldiers in any army, they certainly would have been recognized for these actions.

     The interesting thing here is the attack shows a definite pattern.  Suicide assaulters blasting the entry point and swarming the target, looking for opportunities of attack as they penetrate deeper. I would also be curious if they were wearing body armor under their suicide vests or if they were wearing ANA or ANP uniform? Regardless, the defense that the EI guys had in place, was able to protect what was important and kill all six suicide assaulters. I would be interested in reading the AAR for this and hopefully any lessons learned is getting out to other learning organizations/guard forces throughout Afghanistan. –Matt

——————————————————————

Kunduz

Firefighters try to put out a fire in a building which was attacked by Taliban insurgents in Kunduz  Photo: REUTERS   

DAI Project Office Attacked in Afghanistan, Four People Killed

July 2, 2010

DAI is today mourning the loss of four staff following an early morning attack on our Local Governance and Community Development (LGCD) Program office in Kunduz, Afghanistan. All four of those killed worked for our security subcontractor, Edinburgh International (EI).

“The actions taken by the EI security staff in defense of the compound and project staff were nothing short of heroic,” said DAI President and CEO James Boomgard. “We are deeply grateful for their bravery, and for the work they do day in, day out, to make our development mission possible. Our hearts go out to the families of the deceased at this terrible hour.”

One British, one German, and two Afghan nationals were killed in the incident, and several more EI staff were injured. Two DAI staff were injured but all are safe and receiving medical care under the auspices of the Provincial Reconstruction Team.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress