Feral Jundi

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Publications: State Department Amends ITAR To Add Temporary Export Exemption for Body Armor

   Good information to know.  If anyone else has anything to add, let me know or post it up in comments so we can get it out to the industry.  Cheers. –Matt

——————————————————————

State Department Amends ITAR To Add Temporary Export Exemption for Body Armor

August 7, 2009

The Department of State is amending the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to add an exemption for the temporary export of body armor for exclusive personal use to destinations not subject to restrictions under the ITAR § 126.1, and to Afghanistan and Iraq under specified conditions, effective August 6, 2009.

In order to use the exemption, the protective equipment must be for the individual’s exclusive use and must be returned to the United States. The individual may not re-export the protective equipment to a foreign person or otherwise transfer ownership. The protective equipment may not be exported to any country where the importation would be in violation of that country’s laws.

The U.S. person declaring the temporary export of body armor to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) should use CBP Form 4457, “Certificate of Registration for Personal Effects Taken Abroad.” In the event the body armor is lost or otherwise not returned to the United States, a detailed report about the incident must be submitted to the Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance. The report should describe all attempts to locate the body armor.

Interested parties may submit comments at any time by any of the following methods:

E-mail: DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov with an appropriate subject line.

Mail: Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, ATTN: Regulatory Change, Section 123.17, SA-1, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0112.

This notice may also be viewed on regulations.gov.

For further information, contact Director Charles B. Shotwell, Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, Telephone (202) 663-2792 or Fax (202) 261-8199; E-mail: DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN: Regulatory Change, Section 123.17.

From the blog Official Export Guide

Saturday, August 1, 2009

Publications: GAO-09-351 Summary–Background Screenings and Other Standards for PSC’s

   This is great, because it is a metrics for how the DoD is doing in regards to fixing this stuff and addressing each of these areas.  So it would be cool to check on this report in the future to see how far along the DoD has come.  But going back to leadership, someone needs to motivate the DoD to make this happen, and that someone should be Secretary of Defense Gates.

   Personally, I think he needs to make an official statement that recognizes the legitimacy and the good work of security contractors in this war, then crack the whip to insure these recommendations become ‘implemented’.  I say legitimacy, because that would shut up those freaks out there, who still contend that we are a bunch of blood thirsty mercenaries that care only about money.  I also mention good work, because despite the few incidents in which have been negative, there have been hundreds of contracts that have helped out tremendously.  The CMC projects come to mind, and that program removed tons of munitions off the battlefields in Iraq, thus resulting in less munitions being used by the enemy. Or the thousands of missions contractors have performed, protecting convoys or personnel with their lives, and sometimes losing their life. –Matt

——————————————————————

Contingency Contract Management: DOD Needs to Develop and Finalize Background Screening and Other Standards for Private Security Contractors

GAO-09-351 July 31, 2009

Highlights Page (PDF)

Full Report (PDF, 50 pages)

Recommendations (HTML)

Summary

Currently in Iraq, there are thousands of private security contractor (PSC) personnel supporting DOD and State, many of whom are foreign nationals. Congressional concerns about the selection, training, equipping, and conduct of personnel performing private security functions in Iraq are reflected in a provision in the fiscal year 2008 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that directs DOD to develop guidance on PSCs. This report examines the extent (1) that DOD and State have developed and implemented policies and procedures to ensure that the backgrounds of PSC employees have been screened and (2) that DOD has developed guidance to implement the provisions of the NDAA and (3) that DOD and State have addressed measures on other issues related to PSC employees in Iraq. To address these objectives, GAO reviewed DOD and State guidance, policies, and contract oversight documentation and interviewed agency and private security industry officials.

(more…)

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Afghanistan: The Taliban Release a Copy of Their ‘Code of Conduct’ Rule Book

Filed under: Publications — Tags: , , , , , , — Matt @ 1:26 PM

   I found this at Jarret Brachman’s blog, which he got from Al Jazeera English.  If you follow the link below, he has some more stuff on these rules. It looks like the Taliban command is trying to get organized, or at least give the impression of getting organized. –Matt

——————————————————————

Code of conduct for Taliban

“From the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan [Mullah Omar] Layeha (rulebook) to the Mujahideen.

Rules for mujahideen. Each mujahid is obliged to obey the following rules:

1. A person with responsibility (only commanders) is allowed to give an invitation to those Afghans who are supporting infidels to join the way of the true Islam

2. To those who leave the infidels we will grant security for him and his property. But if he has some personal dispute, or somebody has some claim against him, he has to face our judiciary system.

3. Each mujahideen who is in contact with supporters of the current regime and who invites them to join the true Islam has to inform his commander.

(more…)

Friday, July 10, 2009

Publications: IG Says SBInet Has Too Many Contractors

Filed under: Publications,Technology — Tags: , , , , , — Matt @ 9:17 PM

     Now I read through the report, and there was no mention of EODT using armed guards to protect the building of these sites, so that was not the ‘inherently governmental’ portion they were talking about.  They were talking about the contractors doing the job of upper level management of CBP, which to me is a no-brainer–no duh that is inherently governmental.  It’s also inherently lazy on the part of the CBP to not draft their own reports for congress to read.

(more…)

Friday, May 22, 2009

Publications: Social Networking and National Security: How to Harness Web 2.0 to Protect the Country, by James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.

   Wow, maybe Dr. Carafano is reading FJ?  Because I read through this thing and thought that this was right up there with all the MyPMC.com stuff that I have been talking about.  So bravo for building that snowmobile!

   A couple of things I want to add to this thing, just to put a sprinkling of salt on this dish. Millennials (Generation Y), smart phones, and Boyd’s good ol’ Destruction and Creation paper to be more specific.

    Gen Y will have a huge impact on this country and the way we do business, and they already have had a big impact with the election of President Obama.  They are also one of this country’s main brains and braun in today’s work force. 

    According to this article, there are three (suggested) core elements that drive the ambitions of Generation Y in the workplace : 

Impact–Making a difference is a strong motivational force behind Gen Y’s efforts. Though salary and benefits continue to dominate the no. 1 and 2 on the importance list, making an impact ranks no 3.

Communication–The instant communication framework Gen Y developed through extensive computer usage has lead to a need for more professional feedback than that of past generations. Communication platforms such as SMS, e-mail, video chat, microblogging and blogging have engendered a mindset that necessitates constant communication with others. That mindset has carried over into the workplace.

Flexibility–The divide between work and life is continually growing narrower as more people shift from the bricks-and-mortar to a remote workplace. The rate of remote office workers has increased significantly in the past two years, according to WorldWideWeb.  

   In order to answer the needs of this kind of workforce, you must embrace the tools in which they depend upon.  The benefit will be incredible, if these Network Scientists and social networking engineers can come up with the right framework for this crowd. 

   I have already made my case for how PMC’s/Countries could use this technology, and guess what, today’s contractor workforce are all Millennial Combat vets with iPods and laptops and Myspace/Facebook accounts.  Embrace this stuff, or be left in it’s wake.

   Next, smart phones.  I mention this, because most everyone will have a smart phone here where they will be able to access their social networks, and they already do.  And because each person is like a walking sensor in whatever environment they are in, to not take advantage of this is stupid.  Emails, SMS, word processing, GPS, pictures and film, etc. are all possible on today’s smart phone.  Language software, internet surfing, youtube, you name it, and it is on a smart phone.  The more smart phones that flood the telecom market, the cheaper they get, and the impact of such a thing is that the Millennials will be even more connected and inspired by their environments.  I say inspired, because if that individual wants to make a difference, it will require stimulus that is outside of their bubble or system.  Closed systems suck, and smart phones are a way for people to maintain their connection online.  It allows them to venture out into the world and not worry about missing communications, and if you take the time to watch today’s society in let’s say a mall, you will soon see what I am talking about.  Everyone has smart phones or is wanting to get one, and it will have an impact.  

   Wait until the smart phone wave hits places like Afghanistan and Iraq.  These phones are like a internet cafe in your pocket, and that is a very powerful tool for anyone out there.  From the insurgent learning to make rockets from a Youtube video on a iPhone, to the English student trying to learn the language through a class on the phone, to a doctor looking up crucial information about a procedure–smart phones and all the open source applications that come with, will catch like fire in these countries and have an impact. 

   Finally, the wonderful paper called Destruction and Creation, written by Col. John Boyd, should get more mention when we talk about social networks.  The concepts define exactly why closed systems are not good, and to me, a social network is an excellent tool to open up a system and get external influence.  Think about it a little, and you start to understand why social networks are so powerful.  If I was to take this to a grand strategy level, social networks will help us to not be isolated mentally compared to our enemies. –Matt

Edit:  Dr. Carafano has just visited the site. (see comments section below) 

——————————————————————- 

 

Social Networking and National Security: How to Harness Web 2.0 to Protect the Country

May 18, 2009

by James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.

Backgrounder #2273

Computers have changed how Americans do almost everything. Soon they may alter national security. There is much more on the information superhighway these days than information. There is a traffic jam of conversation facilitated by e-mail, Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, Flickr, Digg, Wikipedia, LinkedIn, Twitter, and other social networking tools (often collectively called Web 2.0) that facilitate discussion, debate, and the exchange of ideas on a global scale.[1] This unprecedented capacity to listen and respond is inexorably restructuring the ways in which information is created and used.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress