Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Technology: So How Safe is GPS?
Thanks to several readers for sending me this one, and this is certainly an important story. For one, I certainly hope the Obama administration will review it’s policies on GPS, and infuse the necessary funding to make this thing solid and secure. We should not be reading stories about GPS possibly breaking down by 2010 or whatever, and this bogles my mind on how this is even a concern. Bottom line, GPS is a vital and life saving technology, and should be treated as such. –Matt
—————————————————————–
Global Positioning System: Significant Challenges in Sustaining and Upgrading Widely Used Capabilities
GAO-09-325 April 30, 2009
Summary
The Global Positioning System (GPS), which provides positioning, navigation, and timing data to users worldwide, has become essential to U.S. national security and a key tool in an expanding array of public service and commercial applications at home and abroad. The United States provides GPS data free of charge. The Air Force, which is responsible for GPS acquisition, is in the process of modernizing GPS. In light of the importance of GPS, the modernization effort, and international efforts to develop new systems, GAO was asked to undertake a broad review of GPS. Specifically, GAO assessed progress in (1) acquiring GPS satellites, (2) acquiring the ground control and user equipment necessary to leverage GPS satellite capabilities, and evaluated (3) coordination among federal agencies and other organizations to ensure GPS missions can be accomplished. To carry out this assessment, GAO’s efforts included reviewing and analyzing program documentation, conducting its own analysis of Air Force satellite data, and interviewing key military and civilian officials.
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Industry Talk: NAF Report in the News
I wanted to post the first little bits of reaction towards the NAF Report. You can see how the report is starting to be used by the various media outlets. At least the Air Force Times article seemed to be more balanced and gave both sides of the issue. –Head Jundi
——————————————————————-
Obama urged to review use of private firms in war
Reuters, Saturday November 15 2008
By Andrea Shalal-Esa
WASHINGTON, Nov 14 (Reuters) – The Obama administration should move away from using private contractors in active battle areas in Iraq and Afghanistan and dramatically step up oversight, a Washington think tank urged on Friday.
The U.S. military has long used private contractors in fighting its wars, but Washington’s reliance on non-uniformed civilians has sharply increased over the past five years, the New America Foundation said in a new report.
It said the ratio of military personnel to private contractors is now around one to one, and some experts believed there are more contractors than troops in Iraq, compared to 50 to one during the 1991 Gulf War, according to the report. (more…)