Feral Jundi

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Industry Talk: State Department Planning Calls For 5,500 Security Contractors In Iraq

     The period immediately after the military withdrawal may be especially sensitive, as extremist groups test the new defenses and attempt to demonstrate their own relevance. Current planning calls for 5,500 security contractors to be employed by the State Department in Iraq, roughly double the current number and not including the Office of Security Cooperation. Roughly four thousand of these will be third-country nationals serving as static perimeter security for the various installations, a continuation of current practice at both civilian and military sites. 

     Though the numbers remain in flux, current plans call for about 600 guards in Irbil, 575 in Baghdad, 335 each in Kirkuk and Mosul, and about 3,650 in Baghdad. Most of State’s security contractors, both perimeter and movement, will be hired through the Worldwide Protective Services (WPS) contract, the successor to the current Worldwide Personal Protective Security (WPPS II) contract. However, some of the specialized security functions described in this section will be contracted separately.SFRC–Iraq: The Transition From A Military Mission To A Civilian-Led Effort

     Very cool and it is nice to get some more numbers on what this will look like. In my Scribd I posted the report if anyone wants to read it. It mostly rehashed a lot of the same issues in past conversations and reports about WPS and the civilian mission in Iraq.

     As far as news with the companies and WPS, all I can suggest is to follow the latest reports in the forums.  There are plenty of threads discussing the rumors and the legitimate news about what is going on with the stuff. All I can say is have patience with the process and do all you can to get that WPS certification. That kind of thing will make you very marketable in this industry. –Matt

Top diplomat defends size, cost of State Dept. presence in Iraq

Report Lists Perils for Envoys After U.S. Leaves Iraq

Top diplomat defends size, cost of State Dept. presence in Iraq

By Walter Pincus

February 1, 2011

The top U.S. diplomat in Iraq on Tuesday defended the size and cost of the State Department’s operations in that country, telling lawmakers that a significant diplomatic footprint will be necessary after the withdrawal of U.S. troops at the end of this year.

(more…)

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Publications: Contractor Support Of USCENTCOM AOR, 1st Quarter FY 2011

Contractor Support of USCENTCOM AOR, 1st Quarter FY 2011

Egypt: Security Companies Playing A Crucial Role In Evacuations

     Evacuation companies can charge anything from $5,000 for a simple security escort to the airport to more than $300,000 for the charter of a jumbo jet and a 15-man armed security team.

 

     With all of the news coming out of Egypt about the protests, this is the stuff that gets my attention. Right now there are numerous companies who are tasked with getting their clients out of Egypt.  It could be wealthy travelers and businessmen, or it could be the study abroad students.  And if you remember the chaos during the Israeli Lebanon war in 2006, there was a similar mad rush for companies to get their clients out of Lebanon. Hell, some of the same players from that ordeal are now involved with the Egypt crisis.

     With this post, I wanted to highlight some of the players for this deal. SOS InternationalControl Risks, Diligence Management Consultants, and Northcott Global Solutions were the companies mentioned below. I am sure these companies will be busy escorting and evacuating hundreds, if not thousands of stranded people. These kind of operations don’t come cheap either. –Matt

Foreign firms evacuate top staff

Bradley Hope

Jan 31, 2011

Hundreds of expatriate businessmen and their families are leaving Egypt as protests rage into the sixth day and encounters with authorities become increasingly violent.

More than 600 people are in the process of being evacuated from across the country in a joint venture between the security companies Control Risks and International SOS.

Other security companies across the region and Europe said they were beginning to escort clients out of the country and make plans in case the situation worsened.

“Today has been the biggest day so far,” Tim Stear, the Control Risks country manager for the UAE, said yesterday. “The moment that led to many companies starting to withdraw was when the military was asked to intervene. There’s very little noticeable uniformed police on the street and lots of looting.”

(more…)

Monday, January 24, 2011

Industry Talk: Security Firms Are The Target Of A Corrupt Afghan Government Once Again

“The lack of transparency makes it very difficult to operate effectively: The rules change every day depending on which department you are talking to,” said a second executive with one of the security firms, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “We’ve heard of companies being pulled up on everything from taxes to vehicle registrations to visas.”

     What can I say? This Afghan government is corrupt and greedy, and is doing all they can to juice this industry and the US.  From the taxation game to this crap, what’s next?

     One funny side note is that Xe was not on this latest list.  I guess they win for the moment. lol –Matt

Security firms are accused of breaking Afghan laws

By Joshua Partlow and Rajiv ChandrasekaranSunday, January 23, 2011

KABUL – The Afghan government has accused several prominent private security companies, including some that work with the U.S. government, of committing “major offenses,” a move that U.S. officials fear could hasten their departure from the country.

A list compiled by Afghan officials cites 16 companies, including several American and British firms, for unspecified serious violations and seven others for having links to high-ranking Afghan officials, according to a copy obtained by The Washington Post.

A decision to ban the major violators and those that have relationships with senior Afghan officials would affect firms that provide about 800 guards for the U.S. Agency for International Development projects and about 3,000 who work on military construction projects for the coalition, said a senior U.S. official.

“We’re wringing our hands over this,” the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue. “We’re waiting to hear which companies will get disbandment notices and when they will have to disband.”

Among those listed as major offenders are Triple Canopy, based in Reston; Washington-based Blue Hackle; and the British firm G4S, the parent company of ArmorGroup North America, which provides security for the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.

(more…)

Friday, January 21, 2011

Cool Stuff: CSIS Debate–Doug Brooks Vs. TX Hammes On The Benefits Of Using Armed Contractors

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress