Feral Jundi

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Media News: National Enquirer Now Legit, According To Pulitzer Prize Board

   Holy cow.  I know this has nothing to do with the security industry, but I think it is still something to put out there. I love it because this is making a few main stream media snobs who call themselves ‘journalists’, slightly miffed. lol I think it is funny when a supermarket rag that normally does stories about ‘bat boy’ or ‘Elvis sightings’, does a better job at reporting on the political stuff, than let’s say the New York Times or CNN. It also sends a message to these folks that maybe reporting the truth, as opposed to applying political bias to your reportage, might get just a tad bit more respect by the Pulitzer folks. So bravo to the committee for sending the message–I get what your saying at least.

   Now if we can get some more bloggers to be recognized by the Pulitzer Prize board, that would really be cool. And I am not talking about main stream media, dressed in bloggers clothing. I am talking about guys and gals who are completely unattached to any kind of group out there, and are completely on their own and doing the deed. Self funded, and doing it all.

   We actually might see more accolades coming towards bloggers. I say if the the main stream media wants to continue to play politics and continues to apply bias to their reportage, then the chances for that to happen only increase. We will keep our eyes out for that, and congrats to the National Enquirer. –Matt

—————————————————————–

Bat boy is happy.

National Enquirer Now Legit, According to Pulitzer Prize Board

Pulitzer Prize Committee Will Consider National Enquirer for Breaking John Edwards Scandal

By SHEILA MARIKAR and RUSSELL GOLDMAN

Feb. 19, 2010

The National Enquirer is now legit, according to the Pulitzer Prize Board.

The body behind journalism’s most prestigious award conceded Thursday that the self-proclaimed tabloid can compete with mainstream news outlets for its prizes. Because it broke the story about former presidential candidate John Edwards’s mistress and love child, the Enquirer’s staff is eligible for the Pulitzer in two categories: “Investigative Reporting” and “National News Reporting.”

(more…)

Monday, February 1, 2010

Media News: The Media And Their Usage Of Security Contractors In War Zones And Disasters

   I wanted to do a quick post about the media and their weird relationship with my industry.  In one breath they will write entire articles about how immoral privatized security is in war zones, and in that same breath they will get on the phone and hire private security officers for protection in war zones and disasters. Kind of ironic isn’t it?

   So I figured I would delve into this concept of the media’s twisted love affair with security contractors, and I came up with some good stuff.

   For this deal, I did write several news organizations, and none of them gave a reply back. I will edit, when I get a reply, but no dice so far.  The question I wanted answered, is who do they use for security in war zones and disaster zones.  Simple question, yet no one wanted to take the time to answer back.

   But the pay dirt was contacting the International News Safety Institute.  Those guys gave me the low down on who the media goes to for security services, and with that, I got all the juice that I wanted.  The three top companies specifically identified by the INSI for these types of high risk services are AKE, TOR International and Chiron Resources. I thought that was cool, and on the INSI website, they even mentioned Armor Group and Hart Security as media supporters.  Hart even boasted about providing services to the media in Haiti on their website and at IPOA.

   So below, I posted all the quotes I could find, listed under testimonials at all of the company websites mentioned.  Notice the big names who just raved about the security services and training given by these companies? lol.  I wonder if their bodyguards ever had to loan them a pen while they wrote scathing articles about security contractors and their ‘immoral activities’ in war zones or disasters?

   Finally, I hope the journalists reading this post understand that we in the industry know what the real deal is.  We know you need us in order to do your business in war zones and disasters.  Behind every high dollar Anderson Cooper type, is some guy getting paid handsomely to be the bullet and shrapnel sponge for that journalist. I just hope that a post like this sheds some light on that deed, because I know most of the media is probably too busy to bother writing about such boring things.- Matt

——————————————————————–

Media support by INSI

While nobody can remove all the danger, journalists can do much to anticipate dangers, reduce risks and come through hazardous assignments safely.

Journalists have an individual responsibility to anticipate and reduce dangers and a collective responsibility through their professional organisations and trades unions to campaign for safer working conditions. Journalists, their organisations and their employers, all have a critical function in reducing the unacceptable rate of death and injury.

A range of specialised media support service is available for journalists working in dangerous environments.

This section gives information about media support providers. INSI gathers details from the organisations themselves plus a variety of other sources. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, but no guarantees can be given. Training may change from time to time and contact details may alter.

Media support services providers are listed in alphabetical order

Link to International News Safety Institute here.

———————————————————————

What the media has to say about AKE

“They’re the industry leaders in training and protecting those of our staff working in harm’s way. Even those of us who think we have nothing to learn have been humbled at the hands of AKE.”

Chris Cramer

(Former) Managing Director, CNN International

“Without AKE’s training, I’m convinced that [my colleague] Bengt wouldn’t be alive today.”

(more…)

Monday, December 21, 2009

Media News: So Why Aren’t Contractors Represented At American Forces Network?

AFN

   The other day I was thinking, why aren’t contractors represented at American Forces Network?  There are thousands of us overseas, and we have been a part of the war effort for years now.  So where is the acknowledgement of our existence at AFN?

   I say this, because every contractor that has ever been to Iraq or Afghanistan, has been exposed to AFN.  We watch all the DoD commercials about safety or suicide prevention or wearing reflector belts on bases, yet there is nothing about contractors.  I think the only commercial I have ever seen dealing with contractors, is a hotline that troops can call if they see contractors ripping off the government.  I wonder if there are any commercials that give information on how to turn in troops who are ripping off the DoD?  Or are contractors the only ones that can do harm?

   Furthermore, you watch all these shows like the Pentagon Channel or the Marines or Army Show, and it is great to see news about what they are doing in the war, but what about the thousands of contractors performing important and essential missions as well?  How about the guys training Afghan Army or Border Patrol folks? Isn’t that a crucial element to the strategy in Afghanistan, yet the contractor side of this is completely ignored?

     How about the munitions clearance programs, or the interpreters, or the dining facility folks?  Where’s the Christmas messages from the various company management out there? Or the thanks from Generals or Congressmen for the work we have done?  I mean you guys contracted our services, are you not thankful for that service?

   I guess my point is, is that we continue to be treated as if we do not exist, or that we really don’t matter in this war.  The reality is that we do matter and we do have a great impact on this war.  And for the DoD to not at least use AFN to communicate with their contractor force, is just stupid.

   They could be developing public service messages that communicate directly to contractors.  The DoD can also target contractors with their resiliency messages, to prevent any future Fitzsimmons type incidents.  There is so much that needs to be said and communicated to my group, yet there is silence. If in fact the DoD wants to make contracting work in this war, they need to connect with us.  To not take advantage of this media tool to create a unity of effort in this war, is yet again, a strategic mistake.

   The irony of it all, is that AFN uses civilians and contractors in the production of their shows. But shhhhh, don’t tell anyone. lol –Matt

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Industry Talk: Afghanistan Security Contractor Blog–‘Knights of Afghanistan’

   The other day I found something very rare in this industry–a blogger.  There are not too many of us doing the blogging thing, so it is always a treat to find others who have a voice to share.  So with that said, let me introduce to you Paladin Six.

   Actually, his stuff reminds me a lot of what Tim Lynch is producing, and that is some ground truth about their little piece of the war effort.  I am sure the milblogging community will find Paladin Six’s posts to be informative as well. I highly recommend putting this blog on your Google Reader to keep track of dispatches, and definitely don’t be a stranger when you visit Knights of Afghanistan. –Matt

——————————————————————

 Paladin Six

Paladin Six, the author of Knights of Afghanistan.

About Me

     Coming up on one year in Afghanistan, serving as Country Manager for a local (all Afghan) private security company. Although I have some limited military experience, I am not one of those ex-Special Forces guys who gets written up in Rolling Stone. This is a business, not a frat party, and we treat it as such.

Knights of Afghanistan

Introduction (first post)

March, 2009

     And so I’m off to Afghanistan. At the suggestion of many of those who know me well, I have decided to create a blog covering my experiences working in the private security industry in Kabul. For personal and professional reasons, this will be an anonymous endeavor, a place to put observations, discoveries and random musings (along with the occasional bit of critical thinking and punditry). I intend to keep the tone light and the style accessible; no claim is made to speak for the broader PSC community or of a monopoly on wisdom (I leave that for actual conversation). With a little luck, this might even be mildly entertaining, at least for me.

     I’m new to this blogging thing, so there are likely to be numerous mistakes of content and style in what follows. In the interest of keeping up to date, I will sometimes be posting without the benefit of a thorough review. I hope to reduce the incidence of idiocy as time goes on. I think you’ll find that I tend to be somewhat less than fully in compliance with tenents of political correctness. I assure you this is entirely intentional. Get over it.

(more…)

Friday, September 25, 2009

Media News: Will a Milblogger Ever Win the George Polk Award?

Filed under: Media News,New York — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 2:26 PM

 “News is what the consensus of journalists determines it to be.”-BBC journalist, Andrew Marr

***** 

   I think it is time for a military blogger (milblogger) to get one of those snazzy George Polk Awards. That is the fair thing to do in my book, and it would be a recognition of the power of new media and it’s importance to the war effort.

    Or do the folks at Long Island University only recognize writers/journalists that produce inaccurate and highly slanderous books about Blackwater? Or does Long Island University only recognize bloggers that are actually more main stream media, than blogger?  For example, I don’t have 7 journalists working for me at Feral Jundi or pay salaries out to anyone.  Hell, I don’t even have a editor or marketing director.

    What I am saying is that it would be really cool to see a guy like Michael Yon get a George Polk Award either for journalism or for photography, or even both! (hint, hint)

   And what defines important journalism in the eyes of the panel? The stuff that Michael has produced is absolutely incredible. Hell, the work done by today’s milbloggers is amazing, because they are the ones that are driving the discussion and invigorating the debate about the correct direction in this war. How about the guys at Small Wars Journal or even the Long War Journal for example?  And what really puts these bloggers front and center is that they are usually soldiers, reporting from the front lines, and pouring their hearts out about what they think is the right direction. They research, they write, they speak the truth, and care about getting the war effort on the right footing.

   I guess my point is, is that if this award actually means something in the world of journalism, then why are there not more awards being presented to bloggers, and especially milbloggers?  We are the new media, and we are contributing greatly to the national and international discussion. We do speak truth to power and we are a part of the consensus, and it is time for the George Polk Award to recognize that milbloggers have contributed greatly to that consensus.

   So this is what you guys can do.  Submit, submit and submit. Get your best stuff out to these guys, and force them to acknowledge our existence. Let’s get one of our own up on that list of George Polk Awardees, and bring some recognition and respect upon those that actually deserve it.-Matt

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress