Feral Jundi

Monday, March 15, 2010

Mexico: The War In Mexico–Drug Slayings Rock U.S. Consulate

   This is just sad and my heart goes out to the families of the deceased. The infant daughter will now grow up without her parents, all because of the brutal acts of cowards.

   Now on to some thoughts with this.  We must do a better job at containing the border, and we must do a better job at protecting folks in Mexico.  This attack is a clear message by the cartels that they are not pleased with the U.S. It is my view that once we said ‘hey, we will help Mexico out’, then we just declared war on the cartels.  So when the cartels actually strike back and kill one of our own, we should now know that this is an act of warfare, and not some random killing.

    Obviously we have been assisting Mexico in their war down south for awhile, and I have talked about that here. The question I have is will this attack result in us ratcheting up our assistance, or backing off? I also expect more demand on the private side of the house, when it comes to protecting companies operating down there. Hell, we might even see an increase of WPPS folks for Mexico. And of course, there is always the idea I floated here on the blog about how to deal with these thugs.  Who knows, and I would like to hear what the readership thinks? –Matt

——————————————————————

 Drug Cartel Weapons

A captured drug cartel cell and their tools of warfare.

Drug Slayings in Mexico Rock U.S. Consulate

March 15, 2010

By ELISABETH MALKIN and MARC LACEY

CIUDAD JUÁREZ, Mexico — The married couple gunned down Saturday as they drove back from a children’s birthday party with their infant daughter in the back seat were concerned about the violence plaguing this border town, but they never believed they could be its next targets, the husband’s brother said in an interview on Monday.

The couple, Leslie Enriquez, 35, a pregnant American consulate worker, and her husband, Arthur H. Redelfs, 34, an officer at the county jail in El Paso, were within sight of the bridge leading to the United States border crossing when gunmen said to have links to drug traffickers drove up to their car and opened fire, killing them both.

“He was a wonderful man,” said the brother, Reuben Redelfs. “We just regret this as a senseless act of violence.”

Gunmen also killed the husband of another consular employee and wounded his two young children in a near-simultaneous shooting elsewhere in the city, in what appeared to be coordinated assaults on American officials and their families. The killings provoked outrage from Washington and raised new questions about whether employees of the United States and their family members were increasingly at risk of being swept into the cross-fire of Mexico’s bloody drug wars.

The couple had been married for a couple years and lived in El Paso, where they were raising their 7-month-old daughter, who was unharmed in the shooting. Mr. Redelfs said he was now caring for the girl.

Despite concerns about the security in Ciudad Juárez, the couple traveled frequently between Texas and Mexico, where they had friends and Ms. Enriquez worked in the visa section of the American Consulate, Mr. Redelfs said.

“They weren’t worried as targets,” he said.

Asked if he believed the couple were targets because of Ms. Enriquez’s consular job, Mr. Redelfs chose his words cautiously, saying, “I find it more than a coincidence that two separate incidents involving consular employees who were shot and killed occurred on the same day.”

Silvio Gonzalez, a spokesman for the United States Consulate in Ciudad Juárez, said the agency would be closed Tuesday “as we mourn the loss in our community.” The consular office was closed Monday for a holiday.

The killings came during a particularly bloody weekend when nearly 50 people were killed nationwide in drug-gang violence, including attacks in Acapulco as American college students began arriving for spring break.

(more…)

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Jobs: Protective Security Specialist (WPPS), OCONUS

   Interesting.  I didn’t know that Aegis was in the game of providing WPPS folks to DoS? Aegis is a good company, and I am sure they will do a great job with this. I am not the POC or Recruiter for this, and please go through the link I provided below in order to apply.

   By the way, if you follow that link below, there are other WPPS positions they are offering, so be sure to check them all out to find what would work for you.  Good luck and let me know how it goes. –Matt

——————————————————————

PROTECTIVE SECURITY SPECIALIST (WPPS)

Posted date: 2010-Jan-15

(ID: 3257)

Aegis is currently recruiting for a Protective Security Specialist.  The Protective Security Specialist Reports directly to the Detail Leader or Shift Leader.  He/she is responsible for the day to day protective security functions as specified in the daily post and detail orders.  Responsible for driving the lead vehicle or follow vehicle or act as the response agent during operations or advanced security preparations.  Maintains protective formation position during the Principal’s walking movements and provides security at the Principal’s residence r Command Post as required.

Required Minimum Qualifications:

    * Secret Clearance

    * U.S. Citizen

    * Level III English

    * 5 Years minimum military experience reflecting a discharge on a valid DD214 as Honorable

    * Successfully complete The Basic WPPS III PSS training

    * Three (3) years of experience in which One (1) year, of the three, shall include experience in protective security assignments. Experience can be gained in the employ of any national. State/Province, Local or commercial entities that provide high threat protective services

    * Maintain weapons qualifications for the Glock, M4, Shotgun, M240, M249, M203 and familiarization for the AK 47

    * Combat Life Saver or Combat Medic Qualified preferred but not required

    * Approved Background check

    * Physically Fit

Protective Security Specialist’s must possess the highest quality of professionalism, attention to detail and leadership skill which requires minimum to no supervision. They must be highly motivated and be able to work extremely well under stress and react effectively and efficiently to emergency situations

Please select ‘LLC’ when applying for the position.

Apply here.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Legal News: Omnibus Bill FY 2010–Embassy and Worldwide Security Protection Stuff

     I found this over at Diplopundit, which is a great blog that tracks this stuff.  They basically broke down the bill as to the budget amounts and any new amendments.  I especially clued into the latest budgetary figures, increases in new security positions, and the latest ‘best value’ contracting mechanism that State has. They even mention the Kabul Fiasco specifically, as a reason for the amendment.  Check it out. –Matt

——————————————————————-

From Diplopundit:

Worldwide Security Protection

The conference agreement provides $1,586,214,000 for Worldwide Security Protection, which is $8,787,000 above the House and $8,786,000 below the Senate. The conferees note that $13,375,000 requested for fiscal year 2010 was included in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-32), bringing the total available for Worldwide Security Protection in fiscal year 2010 to $1,599,589,000. Within the amount provided, $221,926,000, and a projected 200 security positions, are to strengthen the Department’s capacity to respond to the growing security challenges at posts around the world, including the requested positions for the second year of the Visa and Passport Security Plan.

Embassy Security Constructions and Maintenance

The conference agreement provides $1,724,150,000 for Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance, which is the same as the House and Senate, of which $847,300,000 is for priority worldwide security upgrades, acquisition, and construction and $876,850,000 is for other operations, maintenance and construction.

The following provisions are new, modified from the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8), or further clarified in this joint statement.

Sec. 7006. Local Guard Contracts.

The conference agreement includes a new provision which allows the Secretary of State flexibility to award local guard contracts on the basis of either lowest price that is technically acceptable or the best value cost-technical tradeoff (as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation part 15.101) when awarding such contracts in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan.

Current law requires that all local guard contracts must be awarded on the basis of the lowest price that is technically acceptable, and if other factors had been considered, the problems reported earlier this year involving the local guard contract in Kabul, Afghanistan may have been prevented. The conferees understand that providing the Secretary with authority to make awards through the best value approach can enhance the guard force’s effectiveness and justify the additional cost, particularly in countries with dangerous or hostile environments.

Check out Diplopundit here.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Industry Talk: GAO Report Critical of State Department’s Diplomatic Security Bureau

     FP is right.  The surge is happening, and the civilian surge will be coming right along with it.  All of those folks are gonna need security, and DoS needs to prepare for that big time. I didn’t know that DoS was this bad off, and you would think that there would have been plenty of lessons learned to guide them and prepare them for future needs.  WPPS will be big in Afghanistan, and how anyone could have missed the planning and preparation for this, is beyond me. –Matt

Edit: 12/09/09 Check out Danger Room’s post on the same thing here.

——————————————————————

Exclusive: GAO report rips State Department’s Diplomatic Security Bureau

From Foreign Policy

Mon, 12/07/2009

The State Department is tripling its civilian presence in Afghanistan, which will require a huge increase in the amount of security needed to look after those civilians. But State’s bureau in charge of protecting its personnel is already stretched thin and the Afghanistan surge could only exacerbate its administrative and strategic shortfalls, according to a soon-to-be-released GAO report, obtained exclusively by The Cable.

It’s a fact of life that operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan are a now a huge part of the mission for the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS), which protects diplomats all over the world. That’s somewhat a legacy of Condoleezza Rice’s “Transformational Diplomacy” initiative, which was meant to expand the U.S. diplomatic presence to include more robust efforts in more dangerous places. Outposts that might have been closed have been kept open, such as in Lahore, Pakistan, putting added burdens on the diplomatic security infrastructure, the report states.

Success in Afghanistan depends on improving the Afghan government and “that makes civilian efforts as vital as military operations and of longer duration,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said just before last Tuesday’s announcement by the president. “We have begun to elevate diplomacy and development alongside defense in our national security strategy, and we are certainly engaged in doing so in Afghanistan.”

(more…)

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Industry Talk: Triple Canopy to Take Over Xe’s WPPS Contract

Filed under: Industry Talk — Tags: , , , — Matt @ 10:49 PM

 

     Well, we will see how they do.  That is a huge contract to take over, to include the aviation stuff.  –Matt

—————————————————————— 

Source: Firm to take over Blackwater/Xe’s Iraq contract 

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

From Charley Keyes

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Herndon, Virginia-based Triple Canopy has been awarded the security services contract in Baghdad, a State Department source told CNN Tuesday.

The order is effective Tuesday, the source said, but Triple Canopy’s “in-country performance” won’t begin until May 7.

Triple Canopy will take over the expiring contract of Blackwater, which changed its name to Xe last month. The State Department decided in January not to renew Blackwater/Xe’s contract when it expires in May.

That followed a refusal by the Iraqi government to renew the firm’s operating license because of a September 2007 shooting incident in which the Iraqi government says security guards — then employed by Blackwater — fired upon and killed 17 Iraqi civilians.

As part of a contract to protect American diplomats and other employees around the world, the State Department hired Blackwater for a multiple-year assignment in Iraq, renewable once a year. Blackwater/Xe, one of three security firms working for the United States in the country, had one of the biggest security contracts in Iraq.

Triple Canopy already has a State Department contract in Iraq. The new contract will increase its share of the security work there. DynCorp International also has a State Department contract for work in Iraq.

Losing the contract is considered a huge blow to Blackwater/Xe. While the company is privately held, the Iraq contract has been estimated to make up one-third to one-half of its business. Blackwater/Xe has about two dozen aircraft in Iraq, as well as 1,000 personnel.

(more…)

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress